We are about to delete all the `sqlite3`-specific code from `db.c` and this is
one of the last uses of the old interface.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We will soon generalize the DB, so directly reaching into the `struct db`
instance to talk to the sqlite3 connection is bad anyway. This increases
flexibility and allows us to tailor the actual implementation to the
underlying DB.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
`db_select_prepare` was prepending the "SELECT" part in an attempt to limit
its use to read-only statements. This is leads to the queries in the code not
actually being well-formed, which we'll need in a later commit, and was also
resulting in extra allocations. This switches the behavior to just enforce a
"SELECT" prefix being present which allows us to have well-formed queries in
the code again and avoids the extra allocation.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
These will interfere with our query extraction process later on, and they were
really separating definition from use anyway, so let's expand these field lists.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
These are generalized from our internal implementations.
The main difference is that 'struct json_escaped' is now 'struct
json_escape', so we replace that immediately.
The difference between lightningd's json-writing ringbuffer and the
more generic ccan/json_out is that the latter has a better API and
handles escaping transparently if something slips through (though
it does offer direct accessors so you can mess things up yourself!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I was tempted to create a new db_select_stmt wrapper type, but that means
a lot of boilerplate around binding, which expects to work with db_prepare
*and* db_select_prepare.
This lets us clearly differentiate between db queries (which don't need to
go to a plugin) and db changes (which do).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This seems like a premature optimization: it tried to cut down the number of
allocations by reusing the same `struct invoice_details` while iterating through
a number of results. But this sidesteps the checks by `valgrind` and we'd miss a
missing field that was set by the previous iteration.
Reported-by: @rustyrussell
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
structeq() is too dangerous: if a structure has padding, it can fail
silently.
The new ccan/structeq instead provides a macro to define foo_eq(),
which does the right thing in case of padding (which none of our
structures currently have anyway).
Upgrade ccan, and use it everywhere. Except run-peer-wire.c, which
is only testing code and can use raw memcmp(): valgrind will tell us
if padding exists.
Interestingly, we still declared short_channel_id_eq, even though
we didn't define it any more!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I would have liked to make it a tal object, then we'd catch most
things with our memleak detection. However, sqlite3 doesn't seem to
allow allocator overrides.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In preparation for removing in-memory invoice objects.
Since they will be removed, there will no longer be any
individual invoice objects to attach to.
We usually did this, but sometimes they were named after what they did,
rather than what they cleaned up.
There are still a few exceptions:
1. I didn't bother creating destroy_xxx wrappers for htable routines
which already existed.
2. Sometimes destructors really are used for side-effects (eg. to simply
mark that something was freed): these are clearer with boutique names.
3. Generally destructors are static, but they don't need to be: in some
cases we attach a destructor then remove it later, or only attach
to *some* cases. These are best with qualifiers in the destroy_<type>
name.
Suggested-by: @ZmnSCPxj
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Error code is inverted (which makes sense: who returns 'true' on
error?), and anyway there's a leak if we do error.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
`pay_index` has no valid value if not PAID anyway, so
we should correctly leave it uninitialized.
Analysis via valgrind will catch incorrect use of
uninitialized fields.
If we load it with a dummy 0 value, then an
incorrect use of `pay_index` whan invoice is not
PAID will not get caught by valgrind.
