If we fund a channel between two nodes, then mine all the blocks to
announce it, any other nodes may see the announcement before the
blocks, causing CI to complain about "bad gossip":
```
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Ignoring future channel_announcment for 113x1x1 (current block 112)
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_CHANNEL_UPDATE before announcement 113x1x1/0
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_CHANNEL_UPDATE before announcement 113x1x1/1
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_NODE_ANNOUNCEMENT before announcement 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e
```
Add a new helper for this case, and use it where there are more than 2 nodes.
Cleans up test_routing_gossip and a few other places which did this manually.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The blockheight is zero though, since these aren't included in a block
yet.
We also don't issue an 'external' deposit event if we can tell that the
address you're sending to actually belongs to our wallet (we'll issue a
deposit event when it gets included in a block)
I also got an error under CI; it seems the sleep() was insufficient.
So try adding a sleep inside the check_coin_moves, which should cover
everyone.
```
acct_moves = acct_moves[number_moves:]
else:
> if not move_matches(m, acct_moves[0]):
E IndexError: list index out of range
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fire off a snapshot of current account balances (node wallet + every
'active' channel) after we've caught up to the chain tip for the *first*
time (in other words, on start).
We record the amount of fees collected for a routed payment. For
simplicity's sake on the data agg side, we record the fee payment on
*BOTH* the incoming htlc and the outgoing htlc. Note that this results
in double counting if you add up the fees from both an in-routed and
out-routed payment.
Get rid of the 'movement_idx', since we replay events now.
Since we're removing a field from the 'coin_movement' event emission, we
bump the version type.
Changelog-Updated: `coin_movements` events have been revamped and are now on version 2.
test_onchain_dust_out restarts a node, which produces duplicate events.
this is expected, but we need to de-duplicate the events stream to get
accurate results
The old model of coin movements attempted to compute fees etc and log
amounts, not utxos. This is not as robust, as multi-party opens and dual
funded channels make it hard to account for fees etc correctly.
Instead, we move towards a 'utxo' view of the onchain events. Every
event is either the creation or 'destruction' of a utxo. For cases where
the value of the utxo is not (fully) debited/credited to our account, we
also record the output_value. E.g. channel closings spend a utxo who's
entire value we may not own.
Since we're now tracking UTXOs onchain, we can now do more complex
assertions about the onchain footprint of them. The integration tests
have been updated to now use more 'chain aware' assertions about the
ending state.
In fact, we make it compulsory, which means if you don't understand it
you'll hang up on us!
Add some logging for that in future.
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: All new invoices require a payment_secret (i.e. modern TLV format onion)
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: We can no longer connect to peers which don't support `payment_secret`.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
100+ is for experimentation, modern spec practice is to assign feature bits
sequentially as PRs get added, to avoid later renumbering.
Still respect the old bit for now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were actually using the last commit tx's size, since we were
setting it in lightningd. Instead, hand the min and desired feerates
to closingd, and (as it knows the weight of the closing tx), and have
it start negotiation from there.
This can be significantly less when anchor outputs are enabled: for
example in test_closing.py, the commit tx weight is 1124 Sipa, the
close is 672 Sipa!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: Use a more accurate fee for mutual close negotiation.
Note that this also changes so the feature is not represented in channels,
reflecting the recent drafts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: `experimental-onion-messages` enables send, receive and relay of onion messages.
Anchor outputs break many assumptions in our tests:
1. Remove some hardcoded numbers in favor of a fee calc, so we only have to
change in one place.
FIXME: This should also be done for elements!
2. Do binary search to get feerate for a given closing fee.
3. Don't assume output #0: anchor outputs perturb them.
4. Don't assume we can make 1ksat channels (anchors cost 660 sats!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And when it's set, and we're SLOW_MACHINE, simply disable valgrind.
Since Travis (SLOW_MACHINE=1) only does VALGRIND=1 DEVELOPER=1 tests,
and VALGRIND=0 DEVELOPER=0 tests, it was missing tests which needed
DEVELOPER and !VALGRIND.
Instead, this demotes them to non-valgrind tests for SLOW_MACHINEs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These are pulled from wallet/wallet.c, with the fix now that we grind sigs.
This reduces the fees we pay slightly, as you can see in the coinmoves changes.
I now print out all the coin moves in suitable format before we match:
you only see this if the test fails, but it's really helpful.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Spec is wrong (it says it should be compulsory), and Eclair doesn't set it
at all, leading to an error when they send their announcement_signatures.
Fixes: #3703
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-changed: large-channels: negotiate successfully with Eclair nodes.
There are various places where our tests failed with
--enable-expimental-features. And our plugin test overlapped an
existing feature.
We make our expected_feature functions more generic, and use them
everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The new `keysend` plugin modifies the node features that we send to
peers. This commit breaks out the 'expected_features' we use for tests
to encompass this differentiation.
Thanks to @t-bast, who made this possible by interop testing with Eclair!
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive TLV-style onion messages.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive BOLT11 payment_secrets.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now receive basic multi-part payments.
Changelog-Added: RPC: low-level commands sendpay and waitsendpay can now be used to manually send multi-part payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were checking against hardcoded hrp and prefixes. Now we parametrize via
the chainparams.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
