Sometimes, for various reasons, a user disables an offer
and then wants to re-enable it. This should be allowed because,
from the CLN point of view, it is just an internal state.
If a user has constraints on the description of the invoice
because they are using services that link some sort of user ID
to an offer, it is important for the user to be able to re-enable the
offer, not create a new one. Creating a new offer would
require a different description.
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/7360
Co-Developed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
It's an internal undocumented interface, which makes this change less painful.
We *do* check that the invreq_metadata maps to the given invreq_payer_id, which would
is required for us to sign it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's an internal difference, so doesn't actually break compatibility
(it would if we tried to prove we owned an old invoicerequest, but we
don't have infrastructure for that anyway).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They can do it now: before it would have been awkward to look up previous
payments to match it up for recurring offers (which need to use the same
key, hence the same invreq_metadata).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is going to allow us to move it out from lightingd into plugin,
easily. It's legal because the combination of offer id and label must
be unique (with recurrence, we use the same metadata anyay, since they
want to correlate with prior payments anyway).
We already broke recurrence in this PR, so we don't need another note to say
we're changing the key derivation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This has the benefit of being shorter, as well as more reliable (you
will get a link error if we can't print it, not a runtime one!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used to have "unsaved" payments: now we don't we can use
our normal "iterator" pattern rather than returning arrays.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes `check` much more thorough, and useful.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `check` now does much more checking on every command (not just basic parameter types).
This is how we put new invoice_requests into the db; this will be used
by a new "invoicerequest" command which replaces "offerout".
The API is now the same as the offers api.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I know this is an unforgivably large diff, but the spec has changed so
much that most of this amounts to a rewrite.
Some points:
* We no longer have "offer_id" fields, we generate that locally, as all
offer fields are mirrored into invoice_request and then invoice.
* Because of that mirroring, field names all have explicit offer/invreq/invoice
prefixes.
* The `refund_for` fields have been removed from spec: will re-add locally later.
* quantity_min was removed, max == 0 now mean "must specify a quantity".
* I have put recurrence fields back in locally.
This brings us to 655df03d8729c0918bdacac99eb13fdb0ee93345 ("BOLT 12:
add explicit invoice_node_id.")
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's 2b7ad577d7a790b302bd1aa044b22c809c76e49d, which reverts the
point32 changes.
It also restores send_invoice in `invoice`, which we had removed
from spec and put into the recurrence patch.
I originally had implemented compatibility, but other changes
which followed this are far too widespread.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: complete rework of spec from other teams (yay!) breaks previous compatibility (boo!)
This is the one place where we hand point32 over the wire internally, so
remove it.
This is also our first hsm version change!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have them split over common/param.c, common/json.c,
common/json_helpers.c, common/json_tok.c and common/json_stream.c.
Change that to:
* common/json_parse (all the json_to_xxx routines)
* common/json_parse_simple (simplest the json parsing routines, for cli too)
* common/json_stream (all the json_add_xxx routines)
* common/json_param (all the param and param_xxx routines)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
No more "towire_offer", but "towire_tlv_offer".
This means we double-up on the unfortunately-named `tlv_payload` inside
the onion, but we should rename that in the spec when we remove
old payloads.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, this changes the name of a field in invoice_request:
`payer_signature` becomes simply `signature`. So we allow both for
now, and send the old one unless deprecated_apis is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And turn "" includes into full-path (which makes it easier to put
config.h first, and finds some cases check-includes.sh missed
previously).
config.h sets _GNU_SOURCE which really needs to be done before any
'#includes': we mainly got away with it with glibc, but other platforms
like Alpine may have stricter requirements.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As of 2b923a0367c5f9154fcec706e3302cc4658dd889.
Recurrence quotes need to be marked separately, since they're no longer
in offers main bolt.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache:
```
real 0m36.686000-38.956000(38.608+/-0.65)s
user 2m32.864000-42.253000(40.7545+/-2.7)s
sys 0m16.618000-18.316000(17.8531+/-0.48)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm):
```
real 0m8.212000-8.577000(8.39989+/-0.13)s
user 0m12.731000-13.212000(12.9751+/-0.17)s
sys 0m3.697000-3.902000(3.83722+/-0.064)s
```
After:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache: 8% faster
```
real 0m33.802000-35.773000(35.468+/-0.54)s
user 2m19.073000-27.754000(26.2542+/-2.3)s
sys 0m15.784000-17.173000(16.7165+/-0.37)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm): 1% faster
```
real 0m8.200000-8.485000(8.30138+/-0.097)s
user 0m12.485000-13.100000(12.7344+/-0.19)s
sys 0m3.702000-3.889000(3.78787+/-0.056)s
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As requested by @shesek: it's weird to fail if they ask for the exact
same thing (which is quite possible, since offers don't expire by
default).
And add a new "created" field so they can tell if they have an old
one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't support it (yet), but update the spec to include it.
We include the previous field (recurrence_signature) as a shim for the
moment, for compat with existing nodes. It's ugly, but next release
we'll stop *sending* it, then finally we'll stop accepting it!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As per latest spec revision.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: BOLT12 offers can now be unsigned, for really short QR codes.
We used to only set it for single-use offers (where it's required),
but it's still interesting for multi-use offers, so let's keep it
there.
We also put this field in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is similar to the createinvoice API, except we don't need to save
invoice requests in the database. We may, however, have to look up
payment_key for recurring invoice requests, and sign the message with
the payment_key.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Invoices are signed with our own key, but we use a transient payer_key with a
tweak for invoice_requests (and refunds).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Hoist 7200 constant into the bolt12 heade2.
2. Make preimage the last createinvoice arg, so we could make it optional.
3. Check the validity of the preimage in createinvoice.
4. Always output used flag in listoffers.
5. Rename wallet offer iterators to offer_id iterators.
6. Fix paramter typos.
7. Rename `local_offer_id` parameter to `localofferid`.
8. Add reference constraints on local_offer_id db fields.
9. Remove cut/paste comment.
10. Clarify source of fatal() messages in wallet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
