It doesn't make sense currently without EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES, and
check-manpages complains about it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
payload is owned by the peer, which is freed in this case, then we
free payload (again).
==1404== Invalid read of size 8
==1404== at 0x1F39E8: to_tal_hdr (tal.c:174)
==1404== by 0x1F43A4: tal_free (tal.c:479)
==1404== by 0x14B3D1: peer_connected_hook_cb (peer_control.c:1087)
==1404== by 0x15D6E9: plugin_hook_call_ (plugin_hook.c:288)
==1404== by 0x14B40E: plugin_hook_call_peer_connected (peer_control.c:1090)
==1404== by 0x14B5B8: peer_connected (peer_control.c:1135)
==1404== by 0x122FCF: connectd_msg (connect_control.c:310)
==1404== by 0x160291: sd_msg_read (subd.c:480)
==1404== by 0x15FBE7: read_fds (subd.c:308)
==1404== by 0x1E37D1: next_plan (io.c:59)
==1404== by 0x1E434E: do_plan (io.c:407)
==1404== by 0x1E438C: io_ready (io.c:417)
==1404== Address 0x2fcd2268 is 24 bytes inside a block of size 336 free'd
==1404== at 0x4C32D3B: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1404== by 0x1F416E: del_tree (tal.c:421)
==1404== by 0x1F40F2: del_tree (tal.c:412)
==1404== by 0x1F442C: tal_free (tal.c:486)
==1404== by 0x148816: delete_peer (peer_control.c:120)
==1404== by 0x148899: maybe_delete_peer (peer_control.c:136)
==1404== by 0x13A970: destroy_uncommitted_channel (opening_common.c:29)
==1404== by 0x1F3BB1: notify (tal.c:240)
==1404== by 0x1F40A0: del_tree (tal.c:402)
==1404== by 0x1F442C: tal_free (tal.c:486)
==1404== by 0x13D3E9: peer_start_openingd (opening_control.c:911)
==1404== by 0x14B3C2: peer_connected_hook_cb (peer_control.c:1086)
==1404== Block was alloc'd at
==1404== at 0x4C31B0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1404== by 0x1F3C1B: allocate (tal.c:250)
==1404== by 0x1F41B4: tal_alloc_ (tal.c:428)
==1404== by 0x14B454: peer_connected (peer_control.c:1105)
==1404== by 0x122FCF: connectd_msg (connect_control.c:310)
==1404== by 0x160291: sd_msg_read (subd.c:480)
==1404== by 0x15FBE7: read_fds (subd.c:308)
==1404== by 0x1E37D1: next_plan (io.c:59)
==1404== by 0x1E434E: do_plan (io.c:407)
==1404== by 0x1E438C: io_ready (io.c:417)
==1404== by 0x1E6552: io_loop (poll.c:445)
==1404== by 0x12E2AD: io_loop_with_timers (io_loop_with_timers.c:24)
Fixes: #4329
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The fetchinvoice and offers plugins disable themselves if the option
isn't enabled (it's enabled by default on EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: `experimental-offers` enables fetch, payment and creation of (early draft) offers.
Don't include exp directly, use an ifdef in common/bolt12
(like we do for peer and onion wiregen files).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
By returning 'disable: <reason>' inside getmanifest or init result.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: plugins: plugins can now disable themselves by returning `disable`, even if marked important.
Note that this also changes so the feature is not represented in channels,
reflecting the recent drafts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: `experimental-onion-messages` enables send, receive and relay of onion messages.
For some reason, an old version was checked in. We don't currently
use it (since bolt12 support depends on EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES, which
uses bolt12_exp_wire.csv, which is generated and not checked in).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And rename the current patches to all be _exp_*.patch. These
are applied after the basic patches.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'fix.patch':
we got rid of push_msats for dual funded channels. this assumes that hte
peer will match an equal amount of sats as ours (the df_accepter.py
plugin will do this)
We weren't sending a channel_open notification for dual-funded channels.
This is only sent for the 'accepter' side. We send it as soon as both
funding_tx sigs have been exchanged, even though it's possible the
funding transaction might be published without this having been the case.
Since we fail the channel if this happens, only notifying for good/valid
channels reaching the broadcast state is the right way to handle this.
