I misunderstood the API, this ended up nesting a result inside the JSON-RPC
result.
No concerns about backwards compatibility since this is so new.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This seems like overkill, at least for now. Handling the JSON
inline is clearer, for the existing examples at least.
We also remove the dummy hook, rather than fix it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Refactored the weighted-reservoir-sampling algo to make it more straightforward.
It now uses the excess as fraction of capacity as weight. This favors channels that
are more _relatively_ unbalanced to be used for incoming payment.
Now passes test_invoice_routeboost_private() when using max fundamount=16777215.
This also allows plugins to do "hold invoices" a-la LND, useful for
just-in-time inventory handling.
We're careful to handle the invoice getting paid behind our backs, and
the incoming HTLC going away.
Once @cdecker's sphinx rework is in, we can also hand the raw payload
to the invoice_payment_hook, for special effects.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to make it async, so start by moving the core code into
invoice.c and having that directly call fail/success functions for the
htlc.
We add an extra check in fulfill_htlc() that the HTLC state is correct:
that can't happen now, but may once we're async.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For online services, shorter may be fine, but for casual use I'm usually
in a different timezone than the payer, so needs to be at least 1 day.
Certainly 1 hr is short if they have to open a channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I tried to just do gossipd, but it was uncontainable, so this ended up being
a complete sweep.
We didn't get much space saving in gossipd, even though we should save
24 bytes per node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to do it in various places, but we shouldn't do it lightly:
the primitives are there to help us get overflow handling correct.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As a side-effect of using amount_msat in gossipd/routing.c, we explicitly
handle overflows and don't need to pre-prune ridiculous-fee channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The current param_sat accepts "any": rename and move that to invoice.c
where it's called. We rename it to param_msat_or_any and invoice.c
is our first (trivial) amount_msat user.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to still accept it when parsing the database, but this flag
should allow upgrade testing for devs building on top
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian points out that we can iterate by ->size rather than calling
json_next() to find the end (which traverses the entire object!).
Now ->size is reliable (since previous patch), this is OK.
Reported-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian and I both unwittingly used it in form:
*tal_arr_expand(&x) = tal(x, ...)
Since '=' isn't a sequence point, the compiler can (and does!) cache
the value of x, handing it to tal *after* tal_arr_expand() moves it
due to tal_resize().
The new version is somewhat less convenient to use, but doesn't have
this problem, since the assignment is always evaluated after the
resize.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Obviously the Facebook relationship status joke was a bit subtle, but I've
continued it anyway because I'm especially susceptible to Dad jokes.
Suggested-by: @niftynei
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This causes a compiler warning if we don't do something with the
result (hopefully return immediately!).
We use was_pending() to ignore the result in the case where we
complete a command in a callback (thus really do want to ignore
the result).
This actually fixes one bug: we didn't return after command_fail
in json_getroute with a bad seed value.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Usually, this means they return 'command_param_failed()' if param()
fails, and changing 'command_success(); return;' to 'return
command_success()'.
Occasionally, it's more complex: there's a command_its_complicated()
for the case where we can't exactly determine what the status is,
but it should be considered a last resort.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handers of a specific form are both designed to be used as callbacks
for param(), and also dispose of the command if something goes wrong.
Make them return the 'struct command_result *' from command_failed(),
or NULL.
Renaming them just makes sense: json_tok_XXX is used for non-command-freeing
parsers too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
json_escaped.[ch], param.[ch] and jsonrpc_errors.h move from lightningd/
to common/. Tests moved too.
We add a new 'common/json_tok.[ch]' for the common parameter parsing
routines which a plugin might want, taking them out of
lightningd/json.c (which now only contains the lightningd-specific
ones).
The rest is mainly fixing up includes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This (will) avoid the plugin having to walk back from the params object
as it currently does.
No code changes; I removed UNUSED and UNNEEDED labels from the other
parameters though (as *every* json_rpc callback needs to call param()
these days, they're *always* used).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Such an API is required for when we stream it directly. Almost all our
handlers fit this pattern already, or nearly do.
We remove new_json_result() in favor of explicit json_stream_success()
and json_stream_fail(), but still allowing command_fail() if you just
want a simple all-in-one fail wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's the only user of them, and it's going to get optimized.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
gossip.pydiff --git a/common/test/run-json.c b/common/test/run-json.c
index 956fdda35..db52d6b01 100644
We split json_invoice(), as it now needs to round-trip to the gossipd,
and uniqueness checks need to happen *after* gossipd replies to avoid
a race.
For every candidate channel gossipd gives us, we check that it's in
state NORMAL (not shutting down, not still waiting for lockin), that
it's connected, and that it has capacity. We then choose one with
probability weighted by excess capacity, so larger channels are more
likely.
As a side effect of this, we can tell if an invoice is unpayble (no
channels have sufficient incoming capacity) or difficuly (no *online*
channels have sufficient capacity), so we add those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We do this a lot, and had boutique helpers in various places. So add
a more generic one; for convenience it returns a pointer to the new
end element.
I prefer the name tal_arr_expand to tal_arr_append, since it's up to
the caller to populate the new array entry.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
That matches the other CSV names (HSM was the first, so it was written
before the pattern emerged).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This could have been a local static but its used by the run-param test,
so putting it in json.c made things easier.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This was a very simple change and allowed us to remove the special
`json_opt_tok` macro.
Moved the callback out of `common/json.c` to `lightningd/json.c` because the new
callbacks are dependent on `struct command` etc.
(I already started on `json_tok_number`)
My plan is to:
1. upgrade json_tok_X one a time, maybe a PR for each one.
2. When done, rename macros (i.e, remove "_tal").
3. Remove all vestiges of the old callbacks
4. Add new callbacks so that we no longer need json_tok_tok!
(e.g., json_tok_label, json_tok_str, json_tok_msat)
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
tal_count() is used where there's a type, even if it's char or u8, and
tal_bytelen() is going to replace tal_len() for clarity: it's only needed
where a pointer is void.
We shim tal_bytelen() for now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This seems like a premature optimization: it tried to cut down the number of
allocations by reusing the same `struct invoice_details` while iterating through
a number of results. But this sidesteps the checks by `valgrind` and we'd miss a
missing field that was set by the previous iteration.
Reported-by: @rustyrussell
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
