And nail "make check-source" to that specific version (which is a commit id,
not a branch name, so needs a different syntax for git).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These need to be different for testing the example in BOLT 11.
We also use the cltv_final instead of deadline_blocks in the final hop:
various tests assumed 5 was OK, so we tweak utils.py.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are others, but they really are casued by bad failure. We need a
parachute system for these.
Closes: #176
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We pull them from the database on-demand, where we're storing them
anyway. No need to keep them in memory as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
When we see an offered HTLC onchain, we need to use the preimage if we
know it. So we dump all the known HTLC preimages at startup, and send
new ones as we discover them.
This doesn't cover preimages we know because we're the final
recipient; that can happen if an HTLC hasn't been irrevocably
committed yet. We'll do that in a followup patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
So far we were always using the deadline in the announcements, that's
obviously not good, so this introduces the parameter as per spec.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
jl777 reported a crash when we try to pay past reserve. Fix that (and
a whole class of related bugs) and add tests.
In test_lightning.py I had to make non-async path for sendpay() non-threaded
to get the exception passed through for testing.
Closes: #236
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some fields were redundant, some are simply moved into 'struct lightningd'.
All routines updated to hand 'struct lightningd *ld' now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also, we split the more sophisticated json_add helpers to avoid pulling in
everything into lightning-cli, and unify the routines to print struct
short_channel_id (it's ':', not '/' too).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To avoid everything pulling in HTLCs stuff to the opening daemon, we
split the channel and commit_tx routines into initial_channel and
initial_commit_tx (no HTLC support) and move full HTLC supporting versions
into channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I was hoping to defer HTLC updates until we actually store HTLCs, but
we need to flush to DB whenever balances update as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We're very simple about it: if there's a reorganization, we restart. Otherwise
we tell it about everything.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's in the shachain, so storing it is completely redundant. We leave
it in for the moment so we can assert() that nothing has changed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And store in peer->last_tx/peer->last_sig like all other places,
that way we broadcast it if we need to.
Note: the removal of tmpctx in funder_channel() is needed because we
use txs[0], which was allocated off tmpctx.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I made the mistake of thinking it was a [NUM_SIDES] array, but
it's actually our balance, and it's in millisatoshi. Rename
for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is what it actually is, and makes it clearer when we refer to the
spec. It's the commitment we're currently updating, which is the next
commitment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This can happen even without a protocol violation, if the incoming
update_add_htlc crosses over our outgoing shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we get a fail/fulfill on an outgoing HTLC, we tell the correspoding
incoming HTLC about it. But if that peer is disconnected, we don't.
The better solution is to copy the preimage/malformed/failmessage and mark
the incoming HTLC as resolved. This is done most simply by marking it
SENT_REMOVE_HTLC, which will work in the database case as well.
channeld now re-transmits appropriately when it gets started with an HTLC
in that state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's a bit tricky since we want to hand more verbose errors to the local
case, but the locally-created and forwarded paths had diverged (the local
one missing some things).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are two ways we can do retransmission on reconnect: re-derive
what we would have sent, or remember it and simply re-send. The
rederivation is difficult: unwinding state depends on whether we sent
a revoke_and_ack before or after the commitment_signed, and unwinding
a revoke_and_ack would require us to remember HTLCs we would have
normally forgotten at this point.
So we simply tell the master to remember the old signatures for us,
and hand them back in case we need to re-send.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
