Rather than dumping all gossip messages then handling local ones again.
This should help us give timely ping replies.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This fails on the old dev-restart tests, so we need to only enable it
for the new tests:
rusty@rusty-XPS-13-9360:~/devel/cvs/lightning (guilt/ping-pong)$ daemon/test/test-basic --restart --verbose
...
{ }
RESTARTING
dev-restart failed!
valgrind: mmap(0x38000000, 2265088) failed in UME with error 22 (Invalid argument).
valgrind: this can be caused by executables with very large text, data or bss segments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Only the side *accepting* the connection gives a `minumum_depth`, but both
sides are supposed to wait that long:
BOLT #2:
### The `funding_locked` message
...
#### Requirements
The sender MUST wait until the funding transaction has reached
`minimum-depth` before sending this message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We now have two partially overlapping state-machines: the channel
state and the announcement state. We need to request signatures from
the HSM to exchange them with the peer, and we need to have both sets
of signatures before we can proceed and send the actual announcements.
Instead of reusing HSMFD_ECDH, we have an explicit channeld hsm fd,
which can do ECDH and will soon do channel announce signatures as well.
Based-on: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We *should* split the struct into key and data, rather than only comparing
the key parts in the htlc_end_eq function. But meanwhile, this fixes
the code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This lets us link HTLCs from one peer to another; but for the moment it
simply means we can adjust balance when an HTLC is fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is an approximate result (it's only our confirmed balance, not showing
outstanding HTLCs), but it gives an easy way to check HTLCs have been
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We call channel_sent_commit *before* sending (so we know if we need
to), so the name is wrong. Similarly channel_sent_revoke_and_ack.
We can usefully have them tell is if there is outstanding work to do,
too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Passing through 'struct peer *' was a layering violation.
Reported-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The three cases we care about only happen on specific transitions:
1. They can no longer spend our failed HTLC: we can fail the source now.
2. They are fully committed to their new HTLC htlc: we can forward now.
3. They can no longer timeout their fulfilled HTLC: the funds are ours.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
