Before:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache:
```
real 0m36.686000-38.956000(38.608+/-0.65)s
user 2m32.864000-42.253000(40.7545+/-2.7)s
sys 0m16.618000-18.316000(17.8531+/-0.48)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm):
```
real 0m8.212000-8.577000(8.39989+/-0.13)s
user 0m12.731000-13.212000(12.9751+/-0.17)s
sys 0m3.697000-3.902000(3.83722+/-0.064)s
```
After:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache: 8% faster
```
real 0m33.802000-35.773000(35.468+/-0.54)s
user 2m19.073000-27.754000(26.2542+/-2.3)s
sys 0m15.784000-17.173000(16.7165+/-0.37)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm): 1% faster
```
real 0m8.200000-8.485000(8.30138+/-0.097)s
user 0m12.485000-13.100000(12.7344+/-0.19)s
sys 0m3.702000-3.889000(3.78787+/-0.056)s
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This touches a lot of text, mainly to change "if `option_anchor_outputs`"
to "if `option_anchors`"
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
option_will_fund changes the to_remote/to_local commitment tx
outputs by altering the CSV lock for leased channels.
We need to grind/scan for these outputs now, provided the defaults don't
work.
We don't handle our own cheat txs: rather than crash, we should just
log broken and limp along.
This also makes our upcoming penalty test easier: we don't have to
spin up a new node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The commitment tx uses the same feerate as the HTLC txs (which we have
to grind to find), but we can't use it directly since the fee could be
increased by the presence of dust HTLCs. We can still use it to cap
the maximum though.
Time before: 1m6.984s
Time after: 0m15.794s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: onchaind is much faster when unilaterally closing old channels.
We try signatures to see which HTLC (we can have many) is the right one;
we can trivially match htlcs against commitment tx outputs, but the CTLV
can vary, and that's inside the htlc tx itself.
By sorting them, it's easy to skip comparing duplicates:
Time before: 2m32.547s
Time after: 1m6.984s
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Rename memleak_enter_allocations to memleak_find_allocations.
2. Unify scanning for pointers into memleak_remove_region / memleak_remove_pointer.
3. Document the functions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes: #3832
Changelog-Changed: onchaind: We now scorch the earth on theft attempts, RBFing up our penalty transaction as blocks arrive without a penalty transaction getting confirmed.
Note that other directories were explicitly depending on the generated
file, instead of relying on their (already existing) dependency on
$(LIGHTNINGD_HSM_CLIENT_OBJS), so we remove that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is best done by passing `struct bitcoin_signature` around instead
of raw signatures. We still save raw sigs to the db, and of course the
wire protocol uses them.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
HTLC fees increase (larger weight), and the fee paid by the opener
has to include the anchor outputs (i.e. 660 sats).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The main change here is that the previously-optional open/accept
fields and reestablish fields are now compulsory (everyone was
including them anyway). In fact, the open/accept is a TLV
because it was actually the same format.
For more details, see lightning-rfc/f068dd0d8dfa5ae75feedd99f269e23be4777381
Changelog-Removed: protocol: support for optioned form of reestablish messages now compulsory.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Update the `bitcoin_tx_add_input` interface to accept a witness script
and or scriptPubkey.
We save the amount + witness script + witness program (if known) to
the PSBT object for a transaction when creating an input.
For the moment it's a complete tx, but in future designs we might only
be given the specific input which closes the channel.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise this creates noise for the next patch which switches the initial
`struct bitcoin_tx` into a `struct tx_parts`.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's possible for our peer to publish a commitment tx that has already
updated our balance for an htlc before we've completed removing it from
our commitment tx (aka before we've updated our balance). This used to
crash, now we just update our balance (and the channel balance logs!)
and keep going.
If they've removed anything from our balance, we'll end up counting it
as chain_fees below. Not ideal but fine... probably.
Previously we were annotating every movement with the blockheight of
lightningd at notification time. Which is lossy in terms of info, and
won't be helpful for reorg reconciliation. Here we switch over to
logging chain moves iff they've been confirmed.
Next PR will fix this up for withdrawals, which are currently tagged
with a blockheight of zero, since we log on successful send.
On node start we replay onchaind's transactions from the database/from
our loaded htlc table. To keep things tidy, we shouldn't notify the
ledger about these, so we wrap pretty much everything in a flag that
tells us whether or not this is a replay.
There's a very small corner case where dust transactions will get missed
if the node crashes after the htlc has been added to the database but
before we've successfully notified onchaind about it.
Notably, most of the obtrusive updates to onchaind wrappings are due to
the fact that we record dust (ignored outputs) before we receive
confirmation of its confirmation.
We record htlcs when they're fulfilled as 'withdrawals' that are
onchain. This should make use of the payment_hash that we stashed.
Additionally, if an htlc spend comes through that's not ours, it's
probably them resolving our attempted cheat; we should allow it to
proceed without bombing, and just do our accounting as necessary. It'll
all come out in the wash.
For cheats, we do a little bit of weird accounting. First we 'update'
our on-ledger balance to be the entirety of the channel's balance. Then,
as outputs get resolved, we record the fees and outputs as withdrawals
from this amount.
It's possible that they might successfully 'cheat', in which case we
record those as 'penalty' but debits (not credits).
Ignored outputs don't end up in the same 'resolved' pathway as other
tracked outputs do, so we mark them as moved when proposed/broadcast
instead of when resolved (since they'll never flow through as resolved)
