Without this, we have hardly any enforcement. This is why the schema
mistake fixed in the previous patches weren't spotted immediately.
The hard work was done by:
```
$ for f in lightning-*.json; do grep -v '^ "additionalProperties": false,' $f | bagto $f; done
$ for f in lightning-*.json; do sed 's/"properties": {/"additionalProperties": false, "properties": {/' $f | bagto $f; done
$ make fmt-schemas
```
Then checking where 'additionalProperties: true' had been turned to
false (we deliberately use it in some places where there are if
statements in the schema, or occasionally where there can be arbitrary
fields).
[Including doc/rpc-schema-draft.json update by Shahana]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sometimes, for various reasons, a user disables an offer
and then wants to re-enable it. This should be allowed because,
from the CLN point of view, it is just an internal state.
If a user has constraints on the description of the invoice
because they are using services that link some sort of user ID
to an offer, it is important for the user to be able to re-enable the
offer, not create a new one. Creating a new offer would
require a different description.
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/7360
Co-Developed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
