The signing code asserts these are NULL, and if we unmarshal from the
wire then sign them, it gets upset.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
From doing a code walkthrough with Christian Decker; unnecessary const in
bitcoin/tx.c, an erroneous FIXME, a missing comment, and an unused struct.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
BIP141 indicates that the rule for block size has changed: witness
bytes effectively count for 1, and non-witness bytes count for 4, but
the maximum total has increased to 4,000,000.
This means that fee estimates should use the witness cost (divided by
4), not the raw txlen.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently linearize and then measure the string; this is better since
we're about to do it in a second place.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need this for signing segwitness txs. Unfortunately, we don't have it
for transactions we received as hex, only ones we created; to make this safe
we use a pointer which is NULL if we don't know, and those will crash if
we try to sign or check their sigs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This could only happen via our RPC interface (bitcoind should not give
us bad txs!) but it's better to be robust.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without Alpha, it's superfluous. We're about to add segwit support,
but linearization requires a more powerful approach, and segwit
signature checking is completely different and really deserves its
own function.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I had already disabled it, and this clears the decks for Segregated Witness
which gives us everything we want.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All the members of the transaction should be allocated off the
transaction, as they have the same lifetime.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I got confused navigating these, especially since Alpha and Bitcoin
have diverged (BIP68 was proposed after Elements Alpha).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The format for both the nSequence field and the stack arg for
OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY is either:
Time-relative: [Bit 22 = 1] 00000 <time-shifted-by-9>
Block-relative: [Bit 22 = 0] 00000 <number of blocks>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The latest version of the BIP doesn't use inversion, but does use
bitshifts.
It also uncovered a bug in the test scripts: the block timestamps
creep forward when we generate large numbers of blocks (UpdateTime
insists it be > GetMedianTimePast() so it's valid). We need to take
this into account when waiting for the median to move (reduced it from
60 to 30 seconds, since that adds about 14 seconds).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It doesn't matter until we start setting sequence numbers properly,
so hasn't been noticed until now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise valgrind tells you when you test a hash; you want to
know if you hash uninitialized memory long before that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
