Update gossip routiens and various other hecks on the channel state to consider AWAITING_SPLICE to be routable and treated similar to CHANNELD_NORMAL.
Small updates to psbt interface
Changelog-None
v2 channel opens are going to happen over in dualopend. In order
to make sure that these don't end up in the wrong place/to keep track of
the difference between "waiting for sigs" and "have merely initiatlized
a channel", we add two new states to the channel state machine.
A channel that 'originates' in dualopend will only ever arrive at
channeld in the state CHANNELD_NORMAL.
This adds a `state_change` 'cause' to a channel.
A 'cause' is some initial 'reason' a channel was created or closed by:
/* Anything other than the reasons below. Should not happen. */
REASON_UNKNOWN,
/* Unconscious internal reasons, e.g. dev fail of a channel. */
REASON_LOCAL,
/* The operator or a plugin opened or closed a channel by intention. */
REASON_USER,
/* The remote closed or funded a channel with us by intention. */
REASON_REMOTE,
/* E.g. We need to close a channel because of bad signatures and such. */
REASON_PROTOCOL,
/* A channel was closed onchain, while we were offline. */
/* Note: This is very likely a conscious remote decision. */
REASON_ONCHAIN
If a 'cause' is known and a subsequent state change is made with
`REASON_UNKNOWN` the preceding cause will be used as reason, since a lot
(all `REASON_UNKNOWN`) state changes are a subsequent consequences of a prior
cause: local, user, remote, protocol or onchain.
Changelog-Added: Plugins: Channel closure resaon/cause to channel_state_changed notification
Instead of deleting the channels we will simple mark them as `CLOSED` from now
on. This is needed for some of the other tables not to end up with dangling
references that would otherwise survive the channel lifetime, e.g., forwards
and transactions.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
When in this state, we send a canned error "Awaiting unilateral close".
We enter this both when we drop to chain, and when we're trying to get
them to drop to chain due to option_data_loss_protect.
As this state (unlike channel errors) is saved to the database, it means
we will *never* talk to a peer again in this state, so they can't
confuse us.
Since we set this state in channel_fail_permanent() (which is the only
place we call drop_to_chain for a unilateral close), we don't need to
save to the db: channel_set_state() does that for us.
This state change has a subtle effect: we return WIRE_UNKNOWN_NEXT_PEER
instead of WIRE_TEMPORARY_CHANNEL_FAILURE as soon as we get a failure
with a peer. To provoke a temporary failure in test_pay_disconnect we
take the node offline.
Reported-by: Christian Decker @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The billboard is now far more useful to tell what's going on, and this
gets us closer to a state == owner mapping.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And now we can finally do the db upgrade to remove any OPENINGD
channels once, since we never put them back.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
