test_routing_gossip (__main__.LightningDTests) ... lightningd: Outstanding taken pointers: lightningd/peer_control.c:2352:towire_errorfmt(ld, ((void *)0), "Can't resolve your address")
This caused by the other end closing due to the next bug.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There is a race we see sometimes under valgrind on Travis which shows
gossipd receiving the node_announce from master before it reads the
channel_announce from channeld, and thus fails. The simplest solution
is to send the channel_announce and channel_update to master as well,
so it can ensure it sends them to gossipd in order
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It makes it impossible to embed an ipaddr in another structure, since we
always try to skip over any zeroes, which may swallow a following field.
Do the skip specially for the case where we're parsing routing messages:
we never use padding for our own internal messages anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Makes it easier to compare before/after failures. Ideally, we should
run under Travis both with this option and with the seed based on the
entire tmp path (which is still reproducible with determination, but
not fixed every run like this is).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are now only two kinds of subdaemons: global ones (hsmd, gossipd) and
per-peer ones. We can handle many callbacks internally now.
We can have a handler to set a new peer owner, and automatically do
the cleanup of the old one if necessary, since we now know which ones
are per-peer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently rely on a zero exit status. That's the only difference between
onchain finished handling and other per-peer daemons, so instead we should
have an explicit "done" message. This is both clearer, and allows us to
unify.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now the flow is much simpler from a lightningd POV:
1. If we want to connect to a peer, just send gossipd `gossipctl_reach_peer`.
2. Every new peer, gossipd hands up to lightningd, with global/local features
and the peer fd and a gossip fd using `gossip_peer_connected`
3. If lightningd doesn't want it, it just hands the peerfd and global/local
features back to gossipd using `gossipctl_handle_peer`
4. If a peer sends a non-gossip msg (eg `open_channel`) the gossipd sends
it up using `gossip_peer_nongossip`.
5. If lightningd wants to fund a channel, it simply calls `release_channel`.
Notes:
* There's no more "unique_id": we use the peer id.
* For the moment, we don't ask gossipd when we're told to list peers, so
connected peers without a channel don't appear in the JSON getpeers API.
* We add a `gossipctl_peer_addrhint` for the moment, so you can connect to
a specific ip/port, but using other sources is a TODO.
* We now (correctly) only give up on reaching a peer after we exchange init
messages, which changes the test_disconnect case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to make the ip/port optional, so they should go at the end.
In addition, using ip:port is nicer, for gethostbyaddr().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have to do a dance when we get a reconnect in openingd, because we
don't normally expect to free both owner and peer. It's a layering
violation: freeing a peer should clean up the owner's pointer to it,
to avoid a double free, and we can eliminate this dance.
The free order is now different, and the test_reconnect_openingd was
overprecise.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This fixes the only case where the master currently has to write directly
to the peer: re-sending an error. We make gossipd do it, by adding
a new gossipctl_fail_peer message.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, the main daemon needs to pass it about (marshal/unmarshal)
but it won't need to actually use it after the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We pull them from the database on-demand, where we're storing them
anyway. No need to keep them in memory as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
No idea why we were iterating over the list of stubs and then passing
in the index instead of a pointer to the stub directly.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This wires in the loading of `struct htlc_stub`s on-demand when
starting `onchaind` so that we don't need to keep them in memory.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
So far we were tracking the status by including it either in the paid
or the unpaid list. This refactor makes the state explicit, which
matches the planned DB schema much better.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
While loading HTLCs from the database we might not yet have all the
incoming HTLCs loaded when loading a dependent htlc_out. So we defer
the wiring of the HTLCs until we are sure we have them loaded.
This is also the first step towards keeping that association only in
the database, since otherwise we cannot selectively load channels from
DB.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Especially when testing we might want to disable the automatic
reconnection logic in order not to masquerade bugs that disappear when
reconnecting.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Seems to go out to lunch on reorgs:
+136792.168286138 lightningd(9465):BROKEN: bitcoin-cli getchaintips exited 28: 'error code: -28
error message:
Rewinding blocks...
Closes: #286
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
