peer_htlcs has become a bit of a dumping ground: move listforwards
etc to its own file.
Also move `struct channel_info` from peer_htlcs.h to channel.h where
it more logically belongs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes `check` much more thorough, and useful.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `check` now does much more checking on every command (not just basic parameter types).
It was always a bit weird they weren't, and it seems a premature
optimization to make the callbacks to this themselves.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And require --developer to use them.
Also refuse redirection to deprecated APIs if deprecated APIs are disabled!
Changelog-Removed: `dev-sendcustommsg` (use `sendcustommsg`, which was added in v0.10.1)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Clean these up: they were debug logs, but we want to pass this information
back for self-payments.
Also fixes "Attept" typo which altered tests!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If you miss a wait event, you can catch up by doing listinvoices and
getting the max of these fields. It's also a good debugging clue.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we have defined ordering, we can add a start param.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listinvoices` has `index` and `start` parameters for listing control.
We can expose the dbid, rather than pretending we have some "struct
invoice" which is actually just the dbid. And don't have a pile of
"wallet_" wrappers for redirection.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Previously, our code checked for the presence of the `lightning:`
prefix while decoding a bolt11 string. Although this prefix is valid
and accepted by the core lightning pay command, it was causing issues
with how we managed invoices. Specifically, we were skipping the prefix
when creating a copy of the invoice string and storing the raw invoice
(including the prefix) in the database, which caused inconsistencies
in the user experience.
To address this issue, we need to strip the `lightning:` prefix before
calling each core lightning command. In addition, we should
modify the invstring inside the db with the canonical one.
This commit fixes the issue by stripping the `lightning:` prefix
from the `listsendpays` function, which will improve the
user experience and ensure consistency in our invoice management (see
next commit).
Reported-by: @johngribbin
Link: ElementsProject#6207
Fixes: debbdc0
Changelog-Fixes: trim the `lightning:` prefix from invoice everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
We usually have access to `ld`, so avoid the global.
The only place generic code needs it is for the json command struct,
and that already has accessors: add one for libplugin and lightningd
to tell it if deprecated apis are OK.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we need to push off requring this for another full deprecation cycle!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: JSON-RPC: `pay` and `decodepay` with description now correctly handle JSON escapes (e.g " inside description)
"BOLT 4: Remove legacy format, make var_onion_optin compulsory."
This also renamed the redundant "tlv_payload" to "payload", so we
replace "tlv_tlv_payload" with "tlv_payload" everyhere!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Though there's already a `createinvoice` command, there are usecases where a
user may want to sign an invoice that they don't yet have the preimage to. For
example, they may have an htlc_accepted plugin that pays to obtain the preimage
from someone else and returns a `{ "result": "resolve", ... }`.
This RPC command addresses this usecase without overly complicating the
semantics of the existing `createinvoice` command.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `signinvoice` new command to sign BOLT11
invoices.
Also, we don't need to pass the total length to the field parsers,
just the length for this field (confusingly, this was called
"data_length").
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I know this is an unforgivably large diff, but the spec has changed so
much that most of this amounts to a rewrite.
Some points:
* We no longer have "offer_id" fields, we generate that locally, as all
offer fields are mirrored into invoice_request and then invoice.
* Because of that mirroring, field names all have explicit offer/invreq/invoice
prefixes.
* The `refund_for` fields have been removed from spec: will re-add locally later.
* quantity_min was removed, max == 0 now mean "must specify a quantity".
* I have put recurrence fields back in locally.
This brings us to 655df03d8729c0918bdacac99eb13fdb0ee93345 ("BOLT 12:
add explicit invoice_node_id.")
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And check it in invoice.c, insead of a hack where we compare against invhash.
Restore checking, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The "path" is just a message to ourselves. This meets the minimal
requirement for bolt12 invoices: that there be a blinded path (at
least so we can use the path_id inside in place of "payment_secret").
We expose the method to make this path_id to a common routine: offers
will need this for generating more sophisticated paths.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of doing command_fail() in the else, do it immediately then
unindent the normal path.
No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Usually the calls are spontanous, so it's just "cln:<method>#NNN", but
json_invoice() calls listincoming, and json_checkmessage calls
listnodes, so those become "cli:invoice-<pid>/cln:listincoming#NNN".
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can (and probably should!) allocate this off tmpctx rather than
off the response.
Also, json_add_invoice doesn't actually match the normal pattern,
so fix that.
```
E ValueError:
E Node errors:
E Global errors:
E - Node /tmp/ltests-_vbj8az8/test_pay_fail_unconfirmed_channel_1/lightning-2/ has memory leaks: [
E {
E "backtrace": [
E "ccan/ccan/tal/tal.c:442 (tal_alloc_)",
E "wallet/invoices.c:81 (wallet_stmt2invoice_details)",
E "wallet/invoices.c:697 (invoices_get_details)",
E "wallet/wallet.c:2946 (wallet_invoice_details)",
E "lightningd/invoice.c:1296 (json_add_invoices)",
E "lightningd/invoice.c:1370 (json_listinvoices)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:625 (command_exec)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:753 (rpc_command_hook_final)",
E "lightningd/plugin_hook.c:280 (plugin_hook_call_)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:841 (plugin_hook_call_rpc_command)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:938 (parse_request)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:1035 (read_json)",
E "ccan/ccan/io/io.c:59 (next_plan)",
E "ccan/ccan/io/io.c:407 (do_plan)",
E "ccan/ccan/io/io.c:417 (io_ready)",
E "ccan/ccan/io/poll.c:453 (io_loop)",
E "lightningd/io_loop_with_timers.c:22 (io_loop_with_timers)",
E "lightningd/lightningd.c:1194 (main)",
E "../csu/libc-start.c:308 (__libc_start_main)"
E ],
E "label": "wallet/invoices.c:81:struct invoice_details",
E "parents": [
E "common/json_stream.c:41:struct json_stream",
E "ccan/ccan/io/io.c:91:struct io_conn **NOTLEAK**",
E "lightningd/lightningd.c:107:struct lightningd"
E ],
E "value": "0x55a57a77de08"
E }
E ]
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have them split over common/param.c, common/json.c,
common/json_helpers.c, common/json_tok.c and common/json_stream.c.
Change that to:
* common/json_parse (all the json_to_xxx routines)
* common/json_parse_simple (simplest the json parsing routines, for cli too)
* common/json_stream (all the json_add_xxx routines)
* common/json_param (all the param and param_xxx routines)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We had this assertion fail, and I can't see a clear reason why. Remove it
(i.e. don't crash because we're having trouble with creating invoice routehints)
and add logging.
```
Assertion failed: a->c->rr_number < b->c->rr_number (lightningd/invoice.c: cmp_rr_number: 623)
lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version v0.10.2-modded)
0x5654f1c40061 send_backtrace
common/daemon.c:33
0x5654f1c400e9 crashdump
common/daemon.c:46
0x7efd87da6c8a ???
???:0
```
There are several possible causes for this:
1. We have two channels with the same rr_number. A quick audit shows we always set that rr_number to a unique value (and 64 bits, so wrap is not possible between the release and now!).
2. It's theoretically possible that sort() could compare a value with itself, but that would be really dumb: it doesn't that I've ever seen, but then, we've never seen this assert() hit, either.
3. listincoming has given us the same channel twice. I don't see how that is possible: we had a race where channels could momentarily vanish, but never be duplicated (emailed crash.log shows no duplicates!).
4. General corruption/freed memory access. If a channel we've just looked up is gone but still in the hash table, this is possible but would cause lots of random behavior and crashes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
