We can have an update pending because it's too fast, but
refresh_local_channel is supposed to make sure we're up-to-date, so
force immediate application in that case.
Otherwise, we call update_local_channel at the bottom which frees the
pending update. This can mean that we miss a change in fees, for example.
Changelog-Fixed: errors: Errors returning a `channel_update` no longer return an outdated one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Before:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache:
```
real 0m36.686000-38.956000(38.608+/-0.65)s
user 2m32.864000-42.253000(40.7545+/-2.7)s
sys 0m16.618000-18.316000(17.8531+/-0.48)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm):
```
real 0m8.212000-8.577000(8.39989+/-0.13)s
user 0m12.731000-13.212000(12.9751+/-0.17)s
sys 0m3.697000-3.902000(3.83722+/-0.064)s
```
After:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache: 8% faster
```
real 0m33.802000-35.773000(35.468+/-0.54)s
user 2m19.073000-27.754000(26.2542+/-2.3)s
sys 0m15.784000-17.173000(16.7165+/-0.37)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm): 1% faster
```
real 0m8.200000-8.485000(8.30138+/-0.097)s
user 0m12.485000-13.100000(12.7344+/-0.19)s
sys 0m3.702000-3.889000(3.78787+/-0.056)s
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If there's a rate-card for liquidity, we don't know about it until
after startup (the plugin *should* call us at init to tell us what their
current rates are)
This involves removing some fields from the now-misnamed routing.h
datastructures, and various internal messages.
One non-obvious change is to our "keepalive" logic which refreshes
channels every 13 days: instead of using the 'enabled' flag on the
last channel broadcast to decide whether to refresh it, we use the
local connected status directly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This overcomes the internal spam filter on updates, which can be useful
if we're actually trying to send through such a node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: Protocol: always accept channel_updates from errors, even they'd otherwise be rejected as spam.
Fixes: #4300
This avoids overwriting the ones in git, and generally makes things neater.
We have convenience headers wire/peer_wire.h and wire/onion_wire.h to
avoid most #ifdefs: simply include those.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Note that other directories were explicitly depending on the generated
file, instead of relying on their (already existing) dependency on
$(LIGHTNINGD_HSM_CLIENT_OBJS), so we remove that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's almost always "their_features" and "our_features" respectively, so
make those names clear.
Suggested-by: @cdecker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Turns out that unnecessary: all callers can access the feature_set,
so make it much more like a normal primitive.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
common should not include specific per-daemon files. Turns out this
caused a lot of indirect includes to be exposed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a better fix than doing it manually, which turned out
to do it in the wrong order (node_announcement followed by
channel_announcement) anyway.
Should fix many "Bad gossip" messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I had a report of a 0.7.2 user whose node hadn't appeared on 1ml. Their
node_announcement wasn't visible to my node, either.
I suspect this is a consequence of recent version reducing the amount of
gossip they send, as well as large nodes increasingly turning off gossip
altogether from some peers (as we do). We should ignore timestamp filters
for our own channels: the easiest way to do this is to push them out
directly from gossipd (other messages are sent via the store).
We change channeld to wrap the local channel_announcements: previously
we just handed it to gossipd as for any other gossip message we received
from our peer. Now gossipd knows to push it out, as it's local.
This interferes with the logic in tests/test_misc.py::test_htlc_send_timeout
which expects the node_announcement message last, so we generalize
that too.
[ Thanks to @trueptolmy for bugfix! ]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It usually means we're missing something, but there's no way to ask what.
Simply start a broad scid probe.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we have to validate, there can be a delay (and peer might
vanish) between receiving the gossip and actually confirming it, hence
the use of softref.
We will use this information to check that the peers are making progress
as we start asking them for specific information.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
