d822ba1ee accidentally removed this case, which is important: if the
other side didn't get our final matching closing_signed, it will
reconnect and try again. We consider the channel no longer "active"
and thus ignore it, and get upset when it send the
`channel_reestablish` message.
We could just consider CLOSINGD_COMPLETE to be active, but then we'd
have to wait for the closing transaction to be mined before we'd allow
another connection.
We can't special case it when the peer reconnects, because there
could be (in theory) multiple channels for that peer in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE,
and we don't know which one to reestablish.
So, we need to catch this when they send the reestablish, and hand
that msg to closingd to do negotiation again. We already have code
to note that we're in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE and thus ignore any result
it gives us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a transitional patch so we can still close channels cleanly;
for want of a better option, I hooked it into --deprecated-apis.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We shouldn't fail negotiation just because they exceeded what we thought
fair: we're better off as long as it's actually <= final commitment fee.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_txid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When gossipd sends a message, have a gossip_index. When it gets back a
peer, the current gossip_index is included, so it can know exactly where
it's up to.
Most of this is mechanical plumbing through openingd, channeld and closingd,
even though openingd and closingd don't (currently) read gossip, so their
gossip_index will be unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were sending a channeld message to onchaind, which was v. confusing
due to overlap. We make all the numbers distinct, which means we can
also add an assert() that it's valid for that daemon, which catches
such errors immediately.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This change is really to allow us to have a --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail option
so we can handle failures from subdaemons generically.
It also neatens handling so we can have an explicit callback for "peer
did something wrong" (which matters if we want to close the channel in
that case).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
