This is what it actually is, and makes it clearer when we refer to the
spec. It's the commitment we're currently updating, which is the next
commitment.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This can happen even without a protocol violation, if the incoming
update_add_htlc crosses over our outgoing shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When we get a fail/fulfill on an outgoing HTLC, we tell the correspoding
incoming HTLC about it. But if that peer is disconnected, we don't.
The better solution is to copy the preimage/malformed/failmessage and mark
the incoming HTLC as resolved. This is done most simply by marking it
SENT_REMOVE_HTLC, which will work in the database case as well.
channeld now re-transmits appropriately when it gets started with an HTLC
in that state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's a bit tricky since we want to hand more verbose errors to the local
case, but the locally-created and forwarded paths had diverged (the local
one missing some things).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are two ways we can do retransmission on reconnect: re-derive
what we would have sent, or remember it and simply re-send. The
rederivation is difficult: unwinding state depends on whether we sent
a revoke_and_ack before or after the commitment_signed, and unwinding
a revoke_and_ack would require us to remember HTLCs we would have
normally forgotten at this point.
So we simply tell the master to remember the old signatures for us,
and hand them back in case we need to re-send.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need this for reestablishing a channel.
(Note: this patch changes quite a bit in this series, but reshuffling was
tedious).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently it's fairly ad-hoc, but we need to tell it to channeld when
it restarts, so we define it as the non-HTLC balance.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The channel daemon gets the shared secrets from the HSM to save
the master daemon some work. It used to hand these over at
revoke_and_ack receive, which is when the master daemon needs them.
However, it's a bit simpler to hand them over when we first tell
the master about the incoming HTLC (the first commitsig).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They share some fields, but they're basically different, and it's clearest
to treat them differently in most places.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
