jsonrpc handlers usually directly call command_success or
command_fail; not doing that implies they're waiting for something
async.
Put an explicit call (currently a noop) there, and add debugging
checks to make sure it's used.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Couldn't find a good place to put these messages, we probably want to
do the same capability based request routing that we did for the HSM,
but for now this just defines the message in the master messages file.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
If send_htlc_out() fails, it doesn't initialize pc->out; that can
make us think it's still in progress.
Reported-by: Jonas Nick
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When gossipd sends a message, have a gossip_index. When it gets back a
peer, the current gossip_index is included, so it can know exactly where
it's up to.
Most of this is mechanical plumbing through openingd, channeld and closingd,
even though openingd and closingd don't (currently) read gossip, so their
gossip_index will be unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All peers come from gossipd, and maintain an fd to talk to it. Sometimes
we hand the peer back, but to avoid a race, we always recreated it.
The race was that a daemon closed the gossip_fd, which made gossipd
forget the peer, then master handed the peer back to gossipd. We stop
the race by never closing the gossipfd, but hand it back to gossipd
for closing.
Now gossipd has to accept two fds, but the handling of peers is far
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As demonstrated in the test at the end of this series, openingd dying
spontaneously causes the conn to be freed which causes the subd to be
destroyed, which fails the peer, which hits the db.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather than using the destructor, hook up the cmd so we can close it.
peers are allocated off ld, so they are only destroyed explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We are still generating only char* style aliases, but the field is
defined to be unicode, which doesn't mix too well with char.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We don't use it yet, but now we'll decode correctly.
See: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/317
lightning-rfc commit: ef053c09431442697ab46e83f9d3f86e3510a18e
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Change all calls to use the correct serialization and deserialization
functions, include the correct headers and remove the control
messages.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The master now hands channeld either an error code, and channeld
generates the error message, or an error message relayed from another
node to pass through.
This doesn't fill in the channel_update yet: we need to wire up gossipd
to give us that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently lightningd does this, but channeld is perfectly capable of doing it.
channeld is also in a far better position to add channel_updates to it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
estimatesmartfee 4 ECONOMICAL was too high for lnd, so drop it, with some
increased security risk.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The filter is being populated while initializing the daemon and by
adding new keys as they are being generated. The filter is then used
in connect_block to identify transactions of interest.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is mainly used to filter for transactions that may be of interest
to us, i.e., whether one of our keys is the recipient. It currently
does onyl simple scriptpubkey checks, but will eventually be extended
to use bloomfilters and add more sophisticated checks.
For now the goal is to speed up the processing of blocks during startup.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This addresses a performance regression introduced by
6ceb375650. We were storing it in an
otherwise empty DB transaction, which means that DB transaction was no
longer a no-op. Now we defer storing until we need to store the
corresponding HTLC anyway, so we can just piggyback on top of that
transaction.
This is also more consistent since we'd be forgetting the payment
anyway if we restart between adding the HTLC and committing to it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We only send them when we're not awaiting revoke_and_ack: our
simplified handling can't deal with multiple in flights.
Closes: #244
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
