I know this is an unforgivably large diff, but the spec has changed so
much that most of this amounts to a rewrite.
Some points:
* We no longer have "offer_id" fields, we generate that locally, as all
offer fields are mirrored into invoice_request and then invoice.
* Because of that mirroring, field names all have explicit offer/invreq/invoice
prefixes.
* The `refund_for` fields have been removed from spec: will re-add locally later.
* quantity_min was removed, max == 0 now mean "must specify a quantity".
* I have put recurrence fields back in locally.
This brings us to 655df03d8729c0918bdacac99eb13fdb0ee93345 ("BOLT 12:
add explicit invoice_node_id.")
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The new spec removes the offer_id, in favor of mirroring all the
fields. So we need a way of generating a convenient identifier to
identify the offer, and this works.
We also want to extract parts of streams elsewhere, so expose that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is needed for offers to generate blinded paths.
No documentation changes since listincoming is an undocumented
internal hack interface which topology presents for production
of routehints.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And check it in invoice.c, insead of a hack where we compare against invhash.
Restore checking, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The "path" is just a message to ourselves. This meets the minimal
requirement for bolt12 invoices: that there be a blinded path (at
least so we can use the path_id inside in place of "payment_secret").
We expose the method to make this path_id to a common routine: offers
will need this for generating more sophisticated paths.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We had a scheme where lightningd itself would put a per-node secret in
the blinded path, then we'd tell the caller when it was used. Then it
simply checks the alias to determine if the correct path was used.
But this doesn't work when we start to offer multiple blinded paths.
So go for a far simpler scheme, where the secret is generated (and
stored) by the caller, and hand it back to them.
We keep the split "with secret" or "without secret" API, since I'm
sure callers who don't care about the secret won't check that it
doesn't exist! And without that, someone can use a blinded path for a
different message and get a response which may reveal the node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We actually want lightningd to create these, since it wants to put the
path_id secret in the last element. So best API is actually a generic
one, rather than separate APIs to create first and last ones.
And really, the more explicit initialization makes the users clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes us match eed2ab0c30ad7f93e3b2641ca9d7ade32f3d121d
("Use `invalid_onion_blinding` everywhere").
1. Numerous typographical changes.
2. Make sure we *always* return WIRE_INVALID_ONION_BLINDING if
we're in a blinded path.
3. Handle p->total_msat correctly (MPP payments).
4. Reorganize blinding handling just like spec order.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `listfunds` now lists coinbase outputs as 'immature' until they're spendable
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: UTXOs aren't spendable while immature
Since the "struct command" is different from plugins and lightningd, we
need an accessor for this to work (the plugin one is a dummy for now!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Remove the very concept of ONION_REPLY_SIZE, instead make it a
local variable in create_onionreply().
2. Use the proper fromwire_ primitives in unwrap_onionreply() so we
don't have to do explicit length checks.
3. Make fromwire_tal_arrn() return NULL if it fails to pull, instead of
a zero-length allocation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: Protocol: we now correctly decrypt non-256-length onion errors (we always forwarded them fine, now we actually can parse them).
Takes the dualopen collaborative transaction building and makes it available for other daemons to use
Changelog-Added: Added interactive transaction building routine
This is because JSON technically does not allow numeric keys in maps.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: The `extratlvs` argument for `keysend` now allows quoting the type numbers in string
The JSON specification technically disallows maps with numeric keys,
so we'll want to slowly migrate away from using them. This helper
extracts the numeric value from a quoted number, which is a legal
representation of the same in JSON.
Instead of open coding in connectd/onion_message, we move it to common
with a nice API.
This lets us process the BOLT test vectors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Mainly, field name changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: Protocol: Support for forwarding blinded payments (as per latest draft)
Don't shoehorn it into onion_nonfinal_hop() and onion_final_hop(), but
provide an explicit routine "blinded_onion_hops" and an onion helper
"onion_blinded_hop()" for it to call.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's 2b7ad577d7a790b302bd1aa044b22c809c76e49d, which reverts the
point32 changes.
It also restores send_invoice in `invoice`, which we had removed
from spec and put into the recurrence patch.
I originally had implemented compatibility, but other changes
which followed this are far too widespread.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: complete rework of spec from other teams (yay!) breaks previous compatibility (boo!)
It was very tied to x-only keys; we could support it in a backwards
compatibility mode for a while, but getting refunds or proving old
pre-finalization invoices is not worth spending time on.
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: old `payer_key` proofs won't work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the one place where we hand point32 over the wire internally, so
remove it.
This is also our first hsm version change!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise I know we'll miss it. Simply check for a mention: we could well
change things multiple times within a single release.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With the rise of external HSMs like VLS, this is no longer an
internal-only API. Fortunately, it doesn't change very fast so
maintenance should not be a huge burden.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's been obsoleted and needs replacing; less confusing if we remove
it first.
Also, these fields are now present even without an expermintal build
(we'll control at runtime).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
