The latest draft allows these experimental ranges, which involves more
changes than I expected.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: offers: handle experimental ranges in offers/invoice_requests/invoices.
Things are often equivalent but different types:
1. u8 arrays in libwally.
2. sha256
3. Secrets derived via sha256
4. txids
Rather than open-coding a BUILD_ASSERT & memcpy, create a macro to do it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: pay can now pay to bolt12 invoices if entry to blinded hop is specified as a short_channel_id (rather than node id).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This also lets us test offers and invoices work if we are the start of
the blinded path.
Changelog-Added: offers: automatically add a blinded path from a peer if we have no public channels, so unannounced nodes can have offers too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this for invoices published by unannounced nodes: want
something very similar for offers, so generalize and expose it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Ideally, we would be able to submit a payment exactly as an incoming
HTLC would, but our forwarding and decoding logic is currently very
much tied to the HTLC. It would be wonderful to detach that and
have an "injectonion" interface which was unwrapped like any other
(see "injectonionmessage") which would handle self-pay without any
special paths.
Since I'm not prepared to rewrite that all now, instead we use an
interface to decrypt the first hop if it's us, and use the remainder
of the blinded path.
Changelog-Fixed: plugins: pay can now pay a bolt12 invoice even if we, ourselves, are the head of the blinded path within it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For bolt12, we have blinded paths so we route to the head of the blinded
path, which may not be the same as the final payment destination.
This matters mainly for detecting self-pay.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We generate a reply path by simply reversing the outgoing path:
A->B->C gives reply path B->A
A->B gives reply path A
But if we are not a public node, we can't use ourselves as the first
entry of the reply path: this happens if we directly connect to the
head of a blinded path (as we now support).
In this case, give the entire path as a blinded path. We could do
this all the time, but there are some cases where nodes don't like
sending replies where the node itself is the head of the blinded
path (like CLN v24.05 or before!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We only need a connection with a peer, not an actual channel. So
add all peers to the local gossmap.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we can specify a blinded path in an offer, we have to check they
used it (or didn't use it, if we didn't have one!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We iterate through the blinded paths until we can use one, and because we use
the modern code, we properly join paths if we need to route more than one hop
to reach the start of the blinded path.
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: fixed: fetchinvoice tries all blinded paths until one is usable, and handles case where we have to route more than one hop to reach the entry point.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
send_onion_reply() does that for us now, so we don't need to do it up-front.
Simplifies the code quite a bit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And make it use inject_onionmessage. This means we have to be more careful
in createinvoice_done where we had a payload field allocated off tmpctx.
The new code correctly handles the case where we find a path (not just
a peer!) to the start of a blinded path, and need to join the paths.
It worked before if we had to connect directly, just not in the case
where we actually found a usable route of more than 1 hop.
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: fixed: onionmessage replies now work even if we need to route to the start of the blinded reply path.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This will obsolete the existing calls to RPC "sendonionmessage", but
we transition by introducing it separately. It's designed to work with
the common/onion_message routines and "injectonionmessage".
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We already parse some fields, so hand them directly rather than
having fetchinvoice behave as if it's a raw hook.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means only a single gossmap, and they already share the fetchinvoice-noconnect option
and autoconnect code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Plugins: the `fetchinvoice` plugin has been combined into the `offers` plugin.
Making sure that we are able to fetch the invoice
from an offer without description
E pyln.client.lightning.RpcError: RPC call failed: method:
offer, payload: {'amount': '2msat'}, error: {'code': -32602, 'message':
'bolt12: Offer does not contain a description: invalid token
\'"lno1qgsqvgnwgcg35z6ee2h3yczraddm72xrfua9uve2rlrm9deu7xyfzrcgqyppvggz953rvg9rtxj8lalh43z8epwydjfrmffn3y3p5qz5cywpu09rr4vs"\''}
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/7405
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/7404
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
This can't happen because we go the self-pay path in this case, but
once we fix that for bolt12, this can be reached.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If the peer sends you their signatures before we return from the *first*
openchannel_update then the state would still be in
MULTIFUNDCHANNEL_STARTED (not UPDATED) and we'd incorrectly switch the
state to MULTIFUNDCHANNEL_SIGNED, which would plunge us headfirst into
`check_sigs_ready`.
However the `mfc->txid` hadn't been set yet, so we'd crash when trying
to confirm that we've got sigs for the correct txid. Oops.
To fix this, we simply invert the check such that the *only* state that
will move into SIGNED is SECURED
As suggested by @cdecker, I compared `poetry show --tree` results from before/after `cd plugins/clnrest/ && poetry export --output requirements.txt && pip install -r requirements.txt` to check for any significant difference. There is no difference in the tree.
But poetry export removed coincurve & other dependencies from clnrest's requirements.txt.
Changelog-None.
We can filter down to only the list* fields we need. In the case of a
node with 1M forwards, this reduces listforwards time from 5 seconds
to 4 seconds. It will also reduce memory consumption.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are really three subsystems: invoices, forwards and sendpays,
each of which has two variants we care about (successes and failures).
If we split the code that way, we can extract the core differences in
each of these cases and share most of the logic.
It's a bit awkward to iterate over each "subsystem" in the JSON
parameter sense, so we have some iteration code to do that where we
need to.
The result is going to be much easier to paginate!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to make this a more complex struct, so introducing a
new_clean_info() function unifies the code paths.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We documented them as deprecated in v23.08 but unintentionally didn't deprecate them in the code. Thus we are starting their actual deprecation cycle from v24.08 release.
Updating removal version for commands `commando-rune`, `commando-listrunes`, and `commando-blacklist`
Changelog-None.
Somehow, this documentation got lost during the Great Rewrite, so
restore that too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: JSON-RPC: `offer` removed `@` prefix support from `recurrence_base` (use `recurrence_start_any_period` set to `false`)
Changelog-Removed: Plugins: `estimatefees` returning feerates by name (e.g. "opening"); deprecated in v23.05.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
