We currently assume the daemon gives up; gossipd won't, and we want to
test it there too.
This reveals a bug (returning io_close() is bad if the call is to
duplex()), and breaks a test which now continues after dropping a
packet..
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Useful if we want to drop & suppress, for example. We change '=' to mean
do nothing to the packet.
We use this to clean up the test_reconnect_sender_add test.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular, the main daemon needs to pass it about (marshal/unmarshal)
but it won't need to actually use it after the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To reproduce the next bug, I had to ensure that one node keeps thinking it's
disconnected, then the other node reconnects, then the first node realizes
it's disconnected.
This code does that, adding a '0' dev-disconnect modifier. That means
we fork off a process which (due to pipebuf) will accept a little
data, but when the dev_disconnect file is truncated (a hacky, but
effective, signalling mechanism) will exit, as if the socket finally
realized it's not connected any more.
The python tests hang waiting for the daemon to terminate if you leave
the blackhole around; to give a clue as to what's happening in this
case I moved the log dump to before killing the daemon.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
