Turns out this was accidentally changed for v0.10.1 in
d8e68893f5 where we made fee levels less
aggressive.
Oops. I guess we can fix the docs. And we now have "2blocks" if you
want it really fast!
Closes: #6129
Changelog-Fixed: JSON-RPC: `feerates` document correctly that urgent means 6 blocks (not 2), and give better feerate examples.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
mempool.info gives sat/vB, which is 1000 too low for us!
See-also: #6161 (complains setting feerate to 5 doesn't work)
See-also: #6129
Suggested-by: @lightingorb
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
You still need to actually make a rune when lightningd starts, as
commando (for safety) won't work unless you actually generate a rune
(that it knows of!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: hsmtool: `makerune` command to make a master rune for a node.
I tested this indeed breaks if we don't accept it, then implemented
the code to accept it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: protocol: We now correctly accept the `option_scid_alias` bit in `open_channel` `channel_type`.
Changelog-Deprecated: protocol: Not setting `option_scid_alias` in `option_channel` `channel_type` for unannounced channels.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `feerates`: added `floor` field for current minimum feerate bitcoind will accept
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Plugins: `estimatefees` can return explicit `fee_floor` and `feerates` by block number.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And consolidate descriptions into lightning-feerates().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` now allow "minimum" and NN"blocks" as `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`).
Drop try_get_feerate() in favor of explicit feerate_for_deadline() and
smoothed_feerate_for_deadline().
This shows us everywhere we deal with old-style feerates by names.
`delayed_to_us` and `htlc_resolution` will be moving to dynamic fees,
so deprecate those.
Note that "penalty" is still used for generating penalty txs for
watchtowers, and "unilateral_close" still used until we get zero-fee
anchors.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `feerates` `estimates` array shows fee estimates by blockcount from underlying plugin (usually *bcli*).
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`) value *slow* is now 100 block-estimate, not half of 100-block estimate.
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`) expressed as, "delayed_to_us", "htlc_resolution", "max_acceptable" or "min_acceptable". Use explicit block counts or *slow*/*normal*/*urgent*/*minimum*.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we're messing with feerates, it's good to test this directly upfront.
Also, fix documentation!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Turns out the two bcli replacements I checked (`sauron` and
`trustedcoin`) don't even implement this, and the multiplier makes
more sense in lightningd, especially as we move to bcli just providing
raw feerate estimates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are cases (difficult to reproduce with a test) where
a payment will fail one time and succeed later.
As far I understand in this case the groupid field of the payment
is the same, and the only thing that change is the status, so
our logic inside the delpay is ambiguous where it is not
possible to delete a payment as described in https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/6114
A sequence of commands that explain the problem is
```
$ lc -k listpays payment_hash=H
{
"pays": [
{
"bolt11": "I",
"destination": "redacted",
"payment_hash": "H",
"status": "complete",
"created_at": redacted,
"completed_at": redacted,
"preimage": "P",
"amount_msat": "redacted",
"amount_sent_msat": "redacted"
}
]
}
$ lc delpay H complete
{
"code": 211,
"message": "Payment with hash H has failed status but it should be complete"
}
```
In this case, the delpay is not able to delete a payment because the
listpays is returning only the succeeded one, so by running the
listsendpays we may see the following result where our delpay logic
will be stuck because it works to ensure that all the payments stored
in the database has the status specified by the user
```
➜ VincentSSD clightning --testnet listsendpays -k payment_hash=7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4
{
"payments": [
{
"id": 322,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 1,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 1664,
"created_at": 1679510203,
"completed_at": 1679510205,
"status": "failed",
"bolt11": "lntb1pjpkj4xsp52trda39rfpe7qtqahx8jjplhnj3tatxy8rh6sc6afgvmdz7n0llspp50lr5hmdm0re0xvcp2hv3nf2wwvx0r8q3h3e7jmqz0awdfg6w206qdp0w3jhxarfdenjqargv5sxgetvwpshjgrzw4njqun9wphhyaqxqyjw5qcqp2rzjqtp28uqy77te96ylt7ek703h4ayldljsf8rnlztgf3p8mg7pd0qzwf8a3yqqpdqqqyqqqqt2qqqqqqgqqc9qxpqysgqgeya2lguaj6sflc4hx2d89jvah8mw9uax4j77d8rzkut3rkm0554x37fc7gy92ws9l76yprdva2lalrs7fqjp9lcx40zuty8gca0g5spme3dup"
},
{
"id": 323,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 2,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 3663,
"created_at": 1679510205,
"completed_at": 1679510207,
"status": "failed"
},
{
"id": 324,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 3,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 3663,
"created_at": 1679510207,
"completed_at": 1679510209,
"status": "failed"
},
{
"id": 325,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 4,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 4663,
"created_at": 1679510209,
"completed_at": 1679510221,
"status": "complete",
"payment_preimage": "43f746f2d28d4902489cbde9b3b8f3d04db5db7e973f8a55b7229ce774bf33a7"
}
]
}
```
This commit solves the problem by forcing the delete query in the
database to specify status too, and work around this kind of
ambiguous case.
Fixes: f52ff07558 (lightningd: allow delpay to delete a specific payment.)
Reported-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/6114
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Co-Developed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: delpay be more pedantic about delete logic by allowing
delete payments by status directly on the database.
For example, if we use -fsanitize=undefined, we can't do unaligned
integer access, but since we didn't test with the sanitizer flags, we
didn't know this, and set `HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1`.
Also, add -fno-sanitize-recover= in developer mode, so we actually
fail binaries if something is detected.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We have 3 personas:
- Users
- Developers
- Maintainers
The first one basically cover the installation documentation. The
latter two are sorted into the "Developer" category, and the reference
category serves as a quick lookup for facts on anything CLN related.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listclosedchannels` to show old, dead channels we previously had with peers.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
PSBTv2 support is quite low in the ecosystem, so having a call to convert
log messages and the like should be useful since they'll often be in v2.
Changelog-Added: Added setpsbtversion RPC to aid debugging and compatibility
1. Don't refer to obsolete send_invoice flag.
2. Don't refer to obsolete quantity_min field.
3. Don't refer to unsigned vs signed offers: they're all unsigned.
4. Add references to invoicerequest(7).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As reported on Discord, these are undocumented. And thus, um, hard to find!
Reported-by: Aaron Barnard
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These were deprecated in v0.12.0, hence scheduled for removal next version anyway
(use local_fund_msat and remote_funds_msat).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since it's not spec-final yet (hell, it's not even properly specified
yet!) we need to put it behind an experimental flag.
Unfortunately, we don't have support for doing this in a plugin; a
plugin must present features before parsing options. So we need to do
it in core.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Though there's already a `createinvoice` command, there are usecases where a
user may want to sign an invoice that they don't yet have the preimage to. For
example, they may have an htlc_accepted plugin that pays to obtain the preimage
from someone else and returns a `{ "result": "resolve", ... }`.
This RPC command addresses this usecase without overly complicating the
semantics of the existing `createinvoice` command.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `signinvoice` new command to sign BOLT11
invoices.
The existing description is incorrect. `createinvoice` doesn't actually
work when supplied with a custom-encoded bolt11 invoice without the
final 520 signature bits appended. If a users tries to do so, some of
their tagged fields will be incorrectly truncated.
`createinvoice` actually expects that the signatures are there, and it
simply ignores them.
See common/bolt11.c's bolt11_decode_nosig:
/* BOLT #11:
*
* The data part of a Lightning invoice consists of multiple sections:
*
* 1. `timestamp`: seconds-since-1970 (35 bits, big-endian)
* 1. zero or more tagged parts
* 1. `signature`: Bitcoin-style signature of above (520 bits)
*/
if (!pull_uint(&hu5, &data, &data_len, &b11->timestamp, 35))
return decode_fail(b11, fail, "Can't get 35-bit timestamp");
> while (data_len > 520 / 5) {
const char *problem = NULL;
u64 type, data_length;
