We don't need to hand it to channeld: it will read it! We simply
need to tell it to expect it.
Similarly, openingd/dualopend will never see it, so remove that logic.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Either because lightningd tells us it wants to talk, or because the peer
says something about a channel.
We also introduce a behavior change: we disconnect after a failed open.
We might want to modify this later, but we it's a side-effect of openingd
not holding onto idle connections.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The message from lightningd simply acknowleges that we are allowed to
discard the peer (because no subdaemons are talking to it anymore).
This difference becomes more stark once connectd holds on to idle
peers.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently intuit this by whether there's a subdaemon owning it.
But we're about to change the rules and allow connectd to hold idle
connections, so we need an explicit flag.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of doing this weird chaining, just call them all at once and
use a reference counter.
To make it simpler, we return the subd_req so we can hang a destructor
off it which decrements after the request is complete.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise we get weird effects, as htlcs are being freed:
```
2022-01-26T05:07:37.8774610Z lightningd-1: 2022-01-26T04:47:48.770Z DEBUG 030eeb52087b9dbb27b7aec79ca5249369f6ce7b20a5684ce38d9f4595a21c2fda-chan#8: Failing HTLC 18446744073709551615 due to peer death
2022-01-26T05:07:37.8775287Z lightningd-1: 2022-01-26T04:47:48.770Z **BROKEN** 030eeb52087b9dbb27b7aec79ca5249369f6ce7b20a5684ce38d9f4595a21c2fda-chan#8: Neither origin nor in?
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We now let gossipd do it.
This also means there's nothing left in 'struct per_peer_state' to
send across the wire (the fds are sent separately), so that gets
removed from wire messages too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Freeing an unconfirmed channel already releases the subd, so don't
do that explicitly.
2. Use channel->owner to transfer ownership where possible, using
channel_set_owner() which handles all the cases.
This simplifies the code and makes it more readable, IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And turn "" includes into full-path (which makes it easier to put
config.h first, and finds some cases check-includes.sh missed
previously).
config.h sets _GNU_SOURCE which really needs to be done before any
'#includes': we mainly got away with it with glibc, but other platforms
like Alpine may have stricter requirements.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To reduce the surface area of amount of a channel balance that can be
eaten up as htlc dust, we introduce a new config
'--max-dust-htlc-exposure-msat', which sets the max amount that any
channel's balance can be added as dust
Changelog-Added: config: new option --max-dust-htlc-exposure-msat, which limits the total amount of sats to be allowed as dust on a channel
Before:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache:
```
real 0m36.686000-38.956000(38.608+/-0.65)s
user 2m32.864000-42.253000(40.7545+/-2.7)s
sys 0m16.618000-18.316000(17.8531+/-0.48)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm):
```
real 0m8.212000-8.577000(8.39989+/-0.13)s
user 0m12.731000-13.212000(12.9751+/-0.17)s
sys 0m3.697000-3.902000(3.83722+/-0.064)s
```
After:
Ten builds, laptop -j5, no ccache: 8% faster
```
real 0m33.802000-35.773000(35.468+/-0.54)s
user 2m19.073000-27.754000(26.2542+/-2.3)s
sys 0m15.784000-17.173000(16.7165+/-0.37)s
```
Ten builds, laptop -j5, ccache (warm): 1% faster
```
real 0m8.200000-8.485000(8.30138+/-0.097)s
user 0m12.485000-13.100000(12.7344+/-0.19)s
sys 0m3.702000-3.889000(3.78787+/-0.056)s
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
dualopend doesn't always listen to lightningd messages, so it would
sometimes hang at the end of tests.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is in line with the warnings draft, where all-zeroes in a
channel_id is no longer special (i.e. it will be ignored).
But gossipd would send these if it got upset with us, so it's best
practice to ignore them for now anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we treat error messages from peer which refer to "all channels" as warnings, not errors.
