Allow a user to select the utxo set that will be added to a
transaction, via the `utxos` parameter. Optional.
Format for utxos should be of the form ["txid:vout","..."]
`close` takes two optional arguments: `force` and `timeout`.
`timeout` doesn't timeout the close (there's no way to do that), just
the JSON call. `force` (default `false`) if set, means we unilaterally
close at the timeout, instead of just failing.
Timing out JSON calls is generally deprecated: that's the job of the
client. And the semantics of this are confusing, even to me! A
better API is a timeout which, if non-zero, is the time at which we
give up and unilaterally close.
The transition code is awkward, but we'll manage for the three
releases until we can remove it.
The new defaults are to unilaterally close after 48 hours.
Fixes: #2791
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Add an RPC method (not working at the moment) called
`fundchannel_continue` that takes as its parameters a
node_id and a txid for a transaction (that ostensibly has an output
for a channel)
The next commit breaks it: `if b' }\n' not in buff:` is always true since
we're about to clean up our JSON so there won't be a space. I could have
hacked the space in our JSON, but 6 months is long enough anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Tries to return the approxmost posible string of a Millisatoshi amount using
various unit representations. The function will round to an effective
number of digits. Default: 3.
```
>>> Millisatoshi("100000sat").to_approx_str()
'0.001btc'
>>> Millisatoshi("100msat").to_approx_str()
'0.1sat'
>>> Millisatoshi("10000000sat").to_approx_str()
'0.1btc'
```
The old codes if % 1000 statement logic was simply inverted
and produced the opposite output of the intention behin it.
Before Fix:
- Millisatoshi('42sat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042000btc
- Millisatoshi('42001msat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042btc
After Fix:
- Millisatoshi('42sat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042btc
- Millisatoshi('42001msat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042001btc
Currently, when a multiplication operator is invoked that
does not result in an even integer result but a floating result,
the pylightning code will raise an exception:
Millisatoshi must be string with msat/sat/btc suffix or int
This is because the internal float result will be used as
contructor argument like this: return Millisatoshi(10000.5)
This happens especially on fee calculations where small uneven amounts
are calculated.
Millisatoshi's inner representation expected to be an int, otherwise unwanted exceptions could occur
The following example raises: TypeError: __int__ returned non-int (type decimal.Decimal)
from lightning import Millisatoshi
one_sat = Millisatoshi("1sat")
two_sats = one_sat * 2
With the preceeding UTF-8 fix, I'd like to detect UTF-8 support. But
AFAICT Python doesn't have a standard way of doing version exposure.
So I added __version__, but now we need to make sure it matches. I
used the hackiest possible method.
[ Christian Decker fixed version to be sane, so previous comment no longer
applies! --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some JSON functions want a *class*, not just a hook, so provide one.
To make it clear that we want an encoding *class* and a decoding *object*,
rename the UnixDomainSocketRpc encode parameter to encode_cls.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the same deprecation, but one level up. For the moment, we
still support invoices with a `h` field (where description will be
necessary) but that will be removed once this option is removed.
Note that I just changed pylightning without backwards compatibility,
since the field was unlikely to be used, but we could do something
more complex here?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this the RPC will fail to continue buffering if the response does not
fit in the first read, and if we don't switch over to the non-compat
mode. This was introduced by our mitigation of the UTF-8 misalignment, but I
missed this path.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This isn't a problem for now since we don't support multithreading,
and only allow synchronous calls, but eventually this'll become
important.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Little point having users handle the postfixes manually, this
translates them, and also allows Millisatoshi to be used wherever an
'int' would be previously.
There are also helpers to create the formatting in a way c-lightning's
JSONRPC will accept.
All standard arithmetic operations with integers work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We read a JSON message from the buffer, after converting it from raw bytes to
UTF-8, and returning the remainder of the byte array back to the
caller. However the return value of `raw_decode` refers to symbols in the
UTF-8 decoded string, not the raw bytes underlying byte-array, which means
that if we have multi-byte encoded UTF-8 symbols in the byte-array we end up
with a misaligned offset and will return part of the message as
remainder. This would then end up being interpreted as the result of the next
call.
This could not be exploited currently since we use a socket only for a single
JSON-RPC call and will close the connection afterwards, but since we want to
eventually recycle connections for multiple calls, this could have been very
dangerous.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Corné Plooy <@bitonic-cjp>
This was causing `listchannels` to be incredibly slow. The response is
several megabyte in size, and we were only buffering 1Kb on each
iteration.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We inadvertently broke the compatibility between the python library
and the binary when switching to \n\n-delimiters. This reintroduces
the old inefficient parsing, and dynamically upgrades to the faster
version if it detects the \n\n-delimiter.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This doesn't make a performance difference, but even better, it
simplifies the code.
We hacked test_multirpc to send 200x as many commands, and timed the
pytest over 20 runs:
Before:
=================== 1 passed, 136 deselected in 8.550000-9.400000(9.0045+/-0.2) seconds ===================
After:
=================== 1 passed, 136 deselected in 8.540000-9.370000(8.97286+/-0.16) seconds ===================
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to keep the remaining buffer, and we need to try to parse it
before we read the next. I first tried keeping it in the object, but
its lifetime is that of the *socket*, which we actually reopen for
every command.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
