Using a 'feestep' is more restrictive than you'd want, instead we
enforce that the next feerate must be at least 1/64th more than the
last, but put no upper limit on it
Includes update to lnprototest changes
Contributed-By: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: Protocol: Replaces init_rbf's `fee_step` for RBF of v2 opens with `funding_feerate_perkw`, breaking change
Enable non-dev builds to send custom messages.
Preserves 'dev-' for compat-enabled builds.
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: moved dev-sendcustommsg to sendcustommsg
Peer sends funding locked, we tell lightningd who saves it to disk.
Then we restart/reconnect and they retransmit funding_locked. We were
re-notifying lightningd about their lock-in, which was crashing/breaking
things. Instead, we ignore duplicate lock-in messages from the peer.
lightningd-1: 2021-05-11T18:00:12.844Z **BROKEN** 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-chan#1: Internal error DUALOPEND_AWAITING_LOCKIN: channel_got_funding_locked twice
This is set by the peer and is non-negotiable. We're not even going to
check if you got it right. You were told about it via `openchannel2`.
It is what it is.
The other side doesn't know it until *after* it parses this msg. We
add a quick hack to still allow old nodes to work (for now!).
This also fixes a bug (spotted by @niftynei) where any errors we sent
before accepter_start2 would have the new (unknowable!) channel_id
rather than the temp one.
Authored-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case of failures/disconnects between dualopend receiving the sigs
and the main man disconnecting (as can happen using the testing
disconnects), failing to forward their sigs over to lightningd can
result in the channel never progressing from DUALOPEND_OPEN_INIT
to DUALOPEND_AWAITING_LOCKIN.
Always re-relay.
> If the peer's revocation basepoint is unknown (e.g. `open_channel2`),
> a temporary `channel_id` should be found by using a zeroed out basepoint
> for the unknown peer.
We consolidate to the latest/singular RFC patch for dual-funding, so
there's just a single patchfile for the change. Plus we move back to the
opener setting the desired feerate, the accepter merely declines to
participate if they disagree with the set rate.
Looks like #4394 treated a symptom but not the root cause. We were
actually sending the message framed with the WIRE_CUSTOMMSG_OUT and
the length prefix over the encrypted connection to the peer. It just
happened to be a valid custommsg...
This fixes the issue, and this time I made sure we actually send the
raw message over the wire. However for backward compatibility we
needed to imitate the faulty behavior which is 90% of this patch :-)
Changelog-Fixed: plugin: `dev-sendcustommsg` included the type and length prefix when sending a message.
If we're doing an RBF, it's possible that the peer will send us a
funding_locked, shutdown, or tx_signatures message. (We get tx_sigs out
of order on a reconnect)
This lets us gracefully handle a shutdown or funding_locked
sent at any time (after first funding tx) as well.
We move over to the new "warning" paradigm, instead of using
an "rbf_fail" message.
Every failure is either a warning or an error; on warnings we
hang up and reconnect later, effectively resetting the state.
We're *mostly* set up for both sides doing RBF, except that it reverses
the callback flow (using the plugin vs RPC calls) and we're not
currently smart enough to flip between them gracefully
We need to make sure that there's at least one input that's represented
in every single RBF-attempt for this channel, to prevent "parallel"
subsequent RBFs from succeeding/opening (the multi-channel backdoor?!)
No more sending "all-channel" errors; in particular, gossipd now only
sends warnings (which make us hang up), not errors, and peer_connected
rejections are warnings (and disconnect), not errors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Plugins: `peer_connected` rejections now send a warning, not an error, to the peer.
And make all the callers choose which one. In general, I prefer warn,
which lets them reconnect and try again, however some places are either
stated that they must be errors in the spec itself, or in openingd
where we abandon the channel when we close the connection anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: we now send warning messages and close the connection, except on unrecoverable errors.
This is in line with the warnings draft, where all-zeroes in a
channel_id is no longer special (i.e. it will be ignored).
But gossipd would send these if it got upset with us, so it's best
practice to ignore them for now anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we treat error messages from peer which refer to "all channels" as warnings, not errors.
This takes from the draft spec at https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/834
Note that if this draft does not get included, the peer will simply
ignore the warning message (we always close the connection afterwards
anyway).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we now report the new (draft) warning message.
Let plugins know when a channel open has failed.
We need to notify accepters now too, so we remove the check on who's
funding the channel before sending the 'failed' message from
dualopend->master.
We already know what the channel id is, we should go ahead and pass it
on to any listening plugins -- this makes clean up easier/possible
if a open fails early on and we've got reserved utxos.
