Lagrang3 points out that if we hit a maximum, we should take into account
the reserve. This is true, but it's hard for the caller to do, so change
the API to be slightly higher level.
Tell "inform" what happened, and it adjust the constraints appropriately.
This makes the least assumptions possible (a reserve does *not* mean that
the capacity was actually used at that time).
We also add a mode to say "this succeeded": for now this does nothing,
but it could reduce both min/max capacities, and add capacity in the
other direction. This is useful for future payments, but not as useful
for the current one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I got confused, as we had a struct containing two arrays. Simply expose the
reserve_hop struct and use arrays directly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't know anything about most channels, so we create an array of
fp16_t containing them. We zero out ones where we do know something,
and use the previous code as the slow path.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They tell us what paths they're using, so we can adjust capacity estimates
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'reserve-fixup.patch':
fixup! askrene: reservation implementation.
