We consolidate to the latest/singular RFC patch for dual-funding, so
there's just a single patchfile for the change. Plus we move back to the
opener setting the desired feerate, the accepter merely declines to
participate if they disagree with the set rate.
Looks like #4394 treated a symptom but not the root cause. We were
actually sending the message framed with the WIRE_CUSTOMMSG_OUT and
the length prefix over the encrypted connection to the peer. It just
happened to be a valid custommsg...
This fixes the issue, and this time I made sure we actually send the
raw message over the wire. However for backward compatibility we
needed to imitate the faulty behavior which is 90% of this patch :-)
Changelog-Fixed: plugin: `dev-sendcustommsg` included the type and length prefix when sending a message.
If we're doing an RBF, it's possible that the peer will send us a
funding_locked, shutdown, or tx_signatures message. (We get tx_sigs out
of order on a reconnect)
This lets us gracefully handle a shutdown or funding_locked
sent at any time (after first funding tx) as well.
We move over to the new "warning" paradigm, instead of using
an "rbf_fail" message.
Every failure is either a warning or an error; on warnings we
hang up and reconnect later, effectively resetting the state.
We're *mostly* set up for both sides doing RBF, except that it reverses
the callback flow (using the plugin vs RPC calls) and we're not
currently smart enough to flip between them gracefully
We need to make sure that there's at least one input that's represented
in every single RBF-attempt for this channel, to prevent "parallel"
subsequent RBFs from succeeding/opening (the multi-channel backdoor?!)
No more sending "all-channel" errors; in particular, gossipd now only
sends warnings (which make us hang up), not errors, and peer_connected
rejections are warnings (and disconnect), not errors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Plugins: `peer_connected` rejections now send a warning, not an error, to the peer.
And make all the callers choose which one. In general, I prefer warn,
which lets them reconnect and try again, however some places are either
stated that they must be errors in the spec itself, or in openingd
where we abandon the channel when we close the connection anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: we now send warning messages and close the connection, except on unrecoverable errors.
This is in line with the warnings draft, where all-zeroes in a
channel_id is no longer special (i.e. it will be ignored).
But gossipd would send these if it got upset with us, so it's best
practice to ignore them for now anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we treat error messages from peer which refer to "all channels" as warnings, not errors.
This takes from the draft spec at https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/834
Note that if this draft does not get included, the peer will simply
ignore the warning message (we always close the connection afterwards
anyway).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we now report the new (draft) warning message.
Let plugins know when a channel open has failed.
We need to notify accepters now too, so we remove the check on who's
funding the channel before sending the 'failed' message from
dualopend->master.
We already know what the channel id is, we should go ahead and pass it
on to any listening plugins -- this makes clean up easier/possible
if a open fails early on and we've got reserved utxos.
There's a case where a dropped funding_locked will result in the peer
moving onto channeld, while we stay in dualopend. As we haven't
received their funding_locked, we retransmit tx_sigs, which channeld
will need to handle.
With the patch the peer drops it on the floor; the peer will resend
funding_locked on reconnect, which will correctly advance us to
channeld and CHANNELD_NORMAL
Prior to this, all reconnect logic lived in channeld. If you
disconnected before we finished building a funding transaction, that was
no big deal. Now, however, we're waiting for the funding to lock in in
dualopend, instead of handing straight to channeld to wait.
So we need a way to restart dualopend.
We were incorrectly saving the *remote's* commitment transaction as the
'last_tx' for a peer, not our own local one.
When we applied the 'remote_commit_sig' to it, it would fail since the
remote's signature doesn't validate for their commitment transaction.
This will make it possible to do RBF, since we can re-start the opening
process in dualopend while waiting for lock-in.
Note the new channel states are being used, DUALOPEND_INIT and
DUALOPEND_AWAITING_LOCKIN, to differentiate from openingd/channeld opens
