Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Removed: Relative plugin paths are not relative to startup (deprecated v0.7.2.1)
Changelog-Removed: Dummy fields in listforwards (deprecated v0.7.2.1)
If the same memory gets reallocated, our "has the tip changed?" test
gets a false negative. This happened for me about one time in 10,
causing tests/test_misc.py::test_funding_reorg_remote_lags to fail.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This shouldn't happen if channeld is working properly, but I'm going to
change that, and this current code means we stop responding at that point
(not every failpath in peer_accepted_htlc() called channel_internal_error).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We asserted that there wouldn't be a raw failcode.
2. We didn't pass the failure information via JSON in this case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We could use sendonion to do this, but it actually takes a different path through
pay, and I wanted to test all of it, so I made a new dev flag.
We currently get upset with the response:
lightningd/pay.c:556: payment_failed: Assertion `!hout->failcode' failed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This solves a couple of issues with the need to synchronously drop the
connection in case we were required to understand what the peer was talking
about while still allowing users to experiment, just not kill connections.
We cannot let users use `sendcustommsg` to inject messages that are handled
internally since it could result in our internal state tracking being borked.
This command injects a custom message into the encrypted transport stream to
the peer, allowing users to build custom protocols on top of c-lightning
without requiring any changes to c-lightning itself.
This is currently in opening_control since that's the only part that has
access to the uncommitted_channel internals. Otherwise it's independent from
the specific daemon.
These messages may be exchanged between the master and any daemon. For now
these are just the daemons that a peer may be attached to at any time since
the first example of this is the custommsg infrastructure.
Fixes: #3192
Changelog-Added: `waitanyinvoice` now supports a `timeout` parameter, which when set will cause the command to fail when the timeout is reached; can set this to 0 to fail immediately if no new invoice has been paid yet.
json_listconfigs() returns in the middle; the name0 is not always freed.
It will be freed later with the response, but our memleak detection doesn't
know that, and Travis caught it:
Global errors:
E - Node /tmp/ltests-5mfrzh5v/test_hsmtool_secret_decryption_1/lightning-1/ has memory leaks: [
E {
E "backtrace": [
E "ccan/ccan/tal/tal.c:437 (tal_alloc_)",
E "ccan/ccan/tal/tal.c:466 (tal_alloc_arr_)",
E "ccan/ccan/tal/tal.c:794 (tal_dup_)",
E "ccan/ccan/tal/str/str.c:32 (tal_strndup_)",
E "lightningd/options.c:1122 (add_config)",
E "lightningd/options.c:1282 (json_listconfigs)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:588 (command_exec)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:679 (rpc_command_hook_callback)",
E "lightningd/plugin_hook.c:123 (plugin_hook_call_)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:729 (plugin_hook_call_rpc_command)",
E "lightningd/jsonrpc.c:736 (call_rpc_command_hook)",
E "common/timeout.c:39 (timer_expired)",
E "lightningd/io_loop_with_timers.c:32 (io_loop_with_timers)",
E "lightningd/lightningd.c:871 (main)"
E ],
E "label": "lightningd/options.c:1122:char[]",
E "parents": [
E "lightningd/json_stream.c:49:struct json_stream",
E "ccan/ccan/io/io.c:91:struct io_conn",
E "lightningd/lightningd.c:104:struct lightningd"
E ],
E "value": "0x5569ada057a8"
E }
E ]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Generally I prefer structures over u8, since the size is enforced at
runtime; and in several places we were doing conversions as the code
using Sphinx does treat struct secret as type of the secret.
Note that passing an array is the same as passing the address, so
changing from 'u8 secret[32]' to 'struct secret secret' means various
'secret' parameters change to '&secret'. Technically, '&secret' also
would have worked before, since '&' is a noop on array, but that's
always seemed a bit weird.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes it clear we're dealing with a message which is a wrapped error
reply (needing unwrap_onionreply), not an already-wrapped one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is needed to fully implement handling of blockheight disagreements
between us and payee.
If payee believes the blockheight is higher than ours, then `pay`
should wait for our node to achieve that blockheight.
Changelog-Add: Implement `waitblockheight` to wait for a specific blockheight.
Add towire_int() and fromwire_int() functions to "(de)serialize"
"int". This will only work as long as both the caller of towire_int()
and the caller of fromwire_int() use the same in-memory representation
of signed integers and have the same sizeof(int).
Changelog-None
Add "peer not connected" and "unknown peer" as error codes, so that
users can check against numeric error codes instead of textual error
messages.
Will ease https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/3366
Changelog-None
`wallet_payment_store` would free the `wallet_payment` instance which would
then cause us to reload it from the DB. Instead of doing the store->free->load
dance we now tell `wallet_payment_store` whether it should take ownership and
leave it alone if not.
Passing the payment around instead of referencing it through payment_hash and
partid is a nice side-effect.
`wallet_payment_store` frees the unstored payment after it has stored it, but
we still need that instance for our notifications. This is the smallest
possible fix, but I plan to refactor this out.
Changelog-Changed: plugin: `notify_sendpay_success` and `notify_sendpay_failure` are now always called, even if there is no command waiting on the result.
This lets us do more flexible filtering in the next patch. But it also
keeps some weird logic out of gossipd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This increments the `data_version` upon committing dirty transactions, reads
the last data_version upon startup, and tracks the number in memory in
parallel to the DB (see next commit for rationale).
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: Added a `data_version` field to the `db_write` hook which returns a numeric transaction counter.
it's that time of year (merry xmas!)
enables the ability to push_msat on fundchannel
Changelog-Added: RPC: `fundchannel` and `fundchannel_start` can now accept an optional parameter, `push_msat`, which will gift that amount of satoshis to the peer at channel open.
Thanks to @t-bast, who made this possible by interop testing with Eclair!
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive TLV-style onion messages.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now send and receive BOLT11 payment_secrets.
Changelog-Added: Protocol: can now receive basic multi-part payments.
Changelog-Added: RPC: low-level commands sendpay and waitsendpay can now be used to manually send multi-part payments.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Otherwise tests for hold_invoice fail on Travis (they use 180 / 2 as
the timeout, and we free it after 70 seconds).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the final step: we pass the complete fee_states to and from
channeld.
Changelog-Fixed: "Bad commitment signature" closing channels when we sent back-to-back update_fee messages across multiple reconnects.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> One thing I noticed but didn't investigate much: after sending the two
> payments, I tried using `waitsendpay` and it reported an error *208*
> (*"Never attempted payment for
> '98ee736d29d860948e436546a88b0cc84f267de8818531b0fdbe6ce3d080f22a'"*).
>
> I was expecting the result to be something like: "payment succeeded for
> that payment hash" (the HTLCs were correctly settled).
Indeed, if you waitsendpay without specifying a partid, you are waiting
for 0, which may not exist. Clarify the error msg.
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Bastien TEINTURIER <bastien@acinq.fr> writes:
> It looks like the split on c-lightning side is quite limited at the moment:
> the only option is to split a payment in exactly its two halves,
> otherwise I get rejected because of the rule of overpaying more than
> twice the amount?
We only tested exactly two equal-size payments; indeed, our finalhop
test was backwards. We only complain if the final hop pays more than
twice msat (technically, this test is still too loose for mpp: the
spec says we should sum to the exact amount).
Reported-by: @t-bast
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
