The receiving node: ...
- MUST fail the channel if:
- the `witness_stack` weight lowers the effective `feerate`
below the agreed upon transaction `feerate`
We consolidate to the latest/singular RFC patch for dual-funding, so
there's just a single patchfile for the change. Plus we move back to the
opener setting the desired feerate, the accepter merely declines to
participate if they disagree with the set rate.
Looks like #4394 treated a symptom but not the root cause. We were
actually sending the message framed with the WIRE_CUSTOMMSG_OUT and
the length prefix over the encrypted connection to the peer. It just
happened to be a valid custommsg...
This fixes the issue, and this time I made sure we actually send the
raw message over the wire. However for backward compatibility we
needed to imitate the faulty behavior which is 90% of this patch :-)
Changelog-Fixed: plugin: `dev-sendcustommsg` included the type and length prefix when sending a message.
We were getting a memleak error that the open_attempt isnt' being
cleaned up in test_rbf_reconnect_tx_construct. I had some trouble
reproducing it, so I removed the reliance on using `tmpctx` to clean it
up and was more surgical about cleaning it up inline.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` now includes 'last_feerate', 'next_feerate', 'initial_feerate' and 'next_fee_step' for channels in state DUALOPEND_AWAITING_LOCKIN
fixup! listpeers: include feerate info for RBF-candidate channels
We move over to the new "warning" paradigm, instead of using
an "rbf_fail" message.
Every failure is either a warning or an error; on warnings we
hang up and reconnect later, effectively resetting the state.
We're *mostly* set up for both sides doing RBF, except that it reverses
the callback flow (using the plugin vs RPC calls) and we're not
currently smart enough to flip between them gracefully
Users have no idea what they would pay for unilateral closes.
At least this gives them a clue!
Reported-by: @az0re on IRC.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` now shows latest feerate and unilaral close fee.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
only needed for moving the subd->channel from an uncommitted_channel to
a channel; we removed uncommitted_channel from dual_open so it's no
longer necessary
We're going to move over to "unsaved channels" instead of using a
separate "uncommitted_channel" struct. This means a peer might have a
channel that's not saved to the database yet in its channel list
We need to make sure that there's at least one input that's represented
in every single RBF-attempt for this channel, to prevent "parallel"
subsequent RBFs from succeeding/opening (the multi-channel backdoor?!)
