It's possible for our peer to publish a commitment tx that has already
updated our balance for an htlc before we've completed removing it from
our commitment tx (aka before we've updated our balance). This used to
crash, now we just update our balance (and the channel balance logs!)
and keep going.
If they've removed anything from our balance, we'll end up counting it
as chain_fees below. Not ideal but fine... probably.
On node start we replay onchaind's transactions from the database/from
our loaded htlc table. To keep things tidy, we shouldn't notify the
ledger about these, so we wrap pretty much everything in a flag that
tells us whether or not this is a replay.
There's a very small corner case where dust transactions will get missed
if the node crashes after the htlc has been added to the database but
before we've successfully notified onchaind about it.
Notably, most of the obtrusive updates to onchaind wrappings are due to
the fact that we record dust (ignored outputs) before we receive
confirmation of its confirmation.
Mostly we update existing tests to account for channel balances. In a
few places, new tests were needed as there wasn't an existing pathway
that tested the chain-fees for a few penalty cases
For cheats, we do a little bit of weird accounting. First we 'update'
our on-ledger balance to be the entirety of the channel's balance. Then,
as outputs get resolved, we record the fees and outputs as withdrawals
from this amount.
It's possible that they might successfully 'cheat', in which case we
record those as 'penalty' but debits (not credits).
We didn't wait until l2 processed the final state of HTLC #2, so
it might not include it when it drops onchain, leading to us only
getting 3 (not 4) sendrawtx calls.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Previously we've used the term 'funder' to refer to the peer
paying the fees for a transaction; v2 of openchannel will make
this no longer true. Instead we rename this to 'opener', or the
peer sending the 'open_channel' message, since this will be universally
true in a dual-funding world.
They were looking for specific amounts which proved to be rather flaky. Now
they look for specific outputs being available in the `listfunds` result after
everything was settled.
A CONSERVATIVE/3 target for them.
Some noisy changes to the tests as we had to update the estimatesmartfee
mock.
Changelog-Changed: We now use a higher feerate for resolving onchain HTLCs and for penalty transactions
We kept track of an URGENT, a NORMAL, and a SLOW feerate. They were used
for opening (NORMAL), mutual (NORMAL), UNILATERAL (URGENT) transactions
as well as minimum and maximum estimations, and onchain resolution.
We now keep track of more fine-grained feerates:
- `opening` used for funding and also misc transactions
- `mutual_close` used for the mutual close transaction
- `unilateral_close` used for unilateral close (commitment transactions)
- `delayed_to_us` used for resolving our output from our unilateral close
- `htlc_resolution` used for resolving onchain HTLCs
- `penalty` used for resolving revoked transactions
We don't modify our requests to our Bitcoin backend, as the next commit
will batch them !
Changelog-deprecated: The "urgent", "slow", and "normal" field of the `feerates` command are now deprecated.
Changelog-added: The fields "opening", "mutual_close", "unilateral_close", "delayed_to_us", "htlc_resolution" and "penalty" have been added to the `feerates` command.
Before this patch we would only update `channel->last_tx` with the newly
proposed closure tx from the peer if the fee of the new one was lower.
In negotiations where we are at the higher end and the peer starts
lower, all peer's subsequent proposals will be higher than his initial
proposal and in this case we would never update `channel->last_tx`
and would wrongly broadcast his initial proposal at the end of the
negotiation.
Fixes https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/3549
Changelog-Fixed: Always broadcast the latest close transaction at the end of the close fee negotiation, instead of sometimes broadcasting the peer's initial closing proposal.
We still close the channel if we *send* an error, but we seem to have hit
another case where LND sends an error which seems transient, so this will
make a best-effort attempt to preserve our channel in that case.
Some test have to be modified, since they don't terminate as they did
previously :(
Changelog-Changed: quirks: We'll now reconnect and retry if we get an error on an established channel. This works around lnd sending error messages that may be non-fatal.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Spaces just make life a little harder for everyone.
(Plus, fix documentation: it's 'jsonrpc' not 'json' subsystem).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
A log can have a default node_id, which can be overridden on a per-entry
basis. This changes the format of logging, so some tests need rework.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were checking against hardcoded hrp and prefixes. Now we parametrize via
the chainparams.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This was weird right from the start, so we just split the table into integers
and blobs, so each column has a well-defined format. It is also required for
postgres not to cry about explicit casts in the `paramTypes` array.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
It's generally clearer to have simple hardcoded numbers with an
#if DEVELOPER around it, than apparent variables which aren't, really.
Interestingly, our pruning test was always kinda broken: we have to pass
two cycles, since l2 will refresh the channel once to avoid pruning.
Do the more obvious thing, and cut the network in half and check that
l1 and l3 time out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
VALGRIND=1, SLOW_MACHINE=0:
Before: 197.74 seconds
After: 135.43 seconds
Note that we now spend about 13 seconds in teardown, could probably
be optimized.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If l2 doesn't think we're onchain yet, it treats the new connection from l1
as a reconnection, triggering 'ValueError: 1 nodes had unexpected reconnections'
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to change the API, so this makes the tests still work
across the transition (and, as a bonus, tests our backwards compat
shim).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And clean up some dev ones which actually happen (mainly by calling
channel_fail_permanent which logs UNUSUAL, rather than
channel_internal_error which logs BROKEN).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Because the call (wallet_extract_owned outputs) that prints that line can happen
_before_ or _after_ confirmation in block, adding `CONFIRMED` in the later.
make it a bit easier to track mutual channel closures by
adding broadcast txid to the listpeers billboard.
since lightningd manages the 'identity' of the closing tx we need
to send it back to closingd so it can update the billboard
appropriately.
In particular this matches the case of `their_unilateral/to_us` outputs, which
were missing their addresses so far.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We want to disallow using unconfirmed outputs by default, so making the
default 1 confirmation seems a good idea. This also matches `bitcoind`s
minimum confirmation requirement.
Arming however breaks some of our tests, so I used `minconf=0` for the
breaking tests and added a new test specifically for the `minconf` parameter
for `fundchannel`.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
