On testnet I noticed if we can't reach bitcoind for some reason, we'll
keep RBFing our penalty tx ("it didn't go in, RBF harder!!"). Makes
no sense to grossly exceed the amount needed for next block, so simply
cap penalty at 2x "estimatesmartfee 2 CONSERVATIVE".
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Ubuntu clang 15.0.2-1 complains:
```
wallet/wallet.c:280:6: error: variable 'i' set but not used
[-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int i;
^
wallet/wallet.c:339:6: error: variable 'i' set but not used
[-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int i;
^
wallet/wallet.c:4768:9: error: variable 'count' set but not used
[-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
size_t count;
^
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Ubuntu clang 15.0.2-1 complains:
```
wire/peer_exp_wiregen.c:257:14: error: variable 'i' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
for (size_t i = 0; *plen != 0; i++) {
^
wire/peer_exp_wiregen.c:1373:14: error: variable 'i' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
for (size_t i = 0; *plen != 0; i++) {
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were missing the OP_PUSH for the pubkeys, and the spec mentions we
should be using 73 bytes to estimate the witness weight. Effectively
this adds 4 bytes which really just matters in case fees hit the
floor, and computing the weight becomes important.
Changelog-Fixed: onchaind: Witness weight estimations could be slightly lower than the VLS signer
`urllib3` does not ship as built-in with any of the recent python
releases, whereas `urllib` does, and for the uses we have, they are
pretty much identical.
The requests package is preferred, but until installation of python user
dependencies is implemented, sticking with standard modules allows a
frictionless experience.
And make errors gcc-style, so emacs can jump through the automatically.
```
In devtools/reduce-includes.sh line 21:
echo -n "-$LINE"
^-- SC3037 (warning): In POSIX sh, echo flags are undefined.
In devtools/reduce-includes.sh line 25:
echo -n "."
^-- SC3037 (warning): In POSIX sh, echo flags are undefined.
In tools/rel.sh line 6:
prefix=$(printf '%s\n' "${from#$common}" | sed 's@[^/][^/]*@..@g')
^-----^ SC2295 (info): Expansions inside ${..} need to be quoted separately, otherwise they match as patterns.
Did you mean:
prefix=$(printf '%s\n' "${from#"$common"}" | sed 's@[^/][^/]*@..@g')
In tools/rel.sh line 7:
printf '%s\n' "$prefix/${to#$common}"
^-----^ SC2295 (info): Expansions inside ${..} need to be quoted separately, otherwise they match as patterns.
Did you mean:
printf '%s\n' "$prefix/${to#"$common"}"
For more information:
https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC3037 -- In POSIX sh, echo flags are undef...
https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2295 -- Expansions inside ${..} need to b...
make: *** [Makefile:553: check-shellcheck] Error 123
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is how we put new invoice_requests into the db; this will be used
by a new "invoicerequest" command which replaces "offerout".
The API is now the same as the offers api.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We no longer use offers for "I want to send you money", but we'll use
invoice_requests directly. Create a new table for them, and
associated functions.
The "localofferid" for "pay" and "sendpay" is now "localinvreqid".
This is an experimental-only option, so document the change under
experimental only.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: JSON-RPC: `pay` and `sendpay` `localofferid` is now `localinvreqid`.
We no longer have to refer back to the offer for which we're making
the invoice_request, or to the invoice_request we made for an invoice,
as they are all mirrored (and we check!).
It's clearer to simply look at the object directly.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I know this is an unforgivably large diff, but the spec has changed so
much that most of this amounts to a rewrite.
Some points:
* We no longer have "offer_id" fields, we generate that locally, as all
offer fields are mirrored into invoice_request and then invoice.
* Because of that mirroring, field names all have explicit offer/invreq/invoice
prefixes.
* The `refund_for` fields have been removed from spec: will re-add locally later.
* quantity_min was removed, max == 0 now mean "must specify a quantity".
* I have put recurrence fields back in locally.
This brings us to 655df03d8729c0918bdacac99eb13fdb0ee93345 ("BOLT 12:
add explicit invoice_node_id.")
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The new spec removes the offer_id, in favor of mirroring all the
fields. So we need a way of generating a convenient identifier to
identify the offer, and this works.
We also want to extract parts of streams elsewhere, so expose that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just to a direct peer, and we only create one, but this is
enough to test, and make payments to non-public nodes work.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is needed for offers to generate blinded paths.
No documentation changes since listincoming is an undocumented
internal hack interface which topology presents for production
of routehints.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And check it in invoice.c, insead of a hack where we compare against invhash.
Restore checking, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The "path" is just a message to ourselves. This meets the minimal
requirement for bolt12 invoices: that there be a blinded path (at
least so we can use the path_id inside in place of "payment_secret").
We expose the method to make this path_id to a common routine: offers
will need this for generating more sophisticated paths.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of doing command_fail() in the else, do it immediately then
unindent the normal path.
No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We had a scheme where lightningd itself would put a per-node secret in
the blinded path, then we'd tell the caller when it was used. Then it
simply checks the alias to determine if the correct path was used.
But this doesn't work when we start to offer multiple blinded paths.
So go for a far simpler scheme, where the secret is generated (and
stored) by the caller, and hand it back to them.
We keep the split "with secret" or "without secret" API, since I'm
sure callers who don't care about the secret won't check that it
doesn't exist! And without that, someone can use a blinded path for a
different message and get a response which may reveal the node.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We actually want lightningd to create these, since it wants to put the
path_id secret in the last element. So best API is actually a generic
one, rather than separate APIs to create first and last ones.
And really, the more explicit initialization makes the users clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We simply take the first one, and route to the start of that. Then we
append the blinded path to the onion construction.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This current spec is not strict enough: we might complain that the
next peer is not connected, for example, which leaks information.
So return WIRE_INVALID_ONION_BLINDING even if we're the first hop
on the path, to be safe.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This makes us match eed2ab0c30ad7f93e3b2641ca9d7ade32f3d121d
("Use `invalid_onion_blinding` everywhere").
1. Numerous typographical changes.
2. Make sure we *always* return WIRE_INVALID_ONION_BLINDING if
we're in a blinded path.
3. Handle p->total_msat correctly (MPP payments).
4. Reorganize blinding handling just like spec order.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `listfunds` now lists coinbase outputs as 'immature' until they're spendable
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: UTXOs aren't spendable while immature
