The use of status_failed() requires a stubs update, which fails
with unnamed parameters, so tweak the status.h header as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we side-load a channel, using local-add or the removed JSON-RPC
call, then we could end up in a situation in which a channel is
present, but has no associated channel_announcement. The presence of
the channel_announcement was used to identify new channels, so this
could lead to channels always being considered new. This then caused
the announcements being added to the queue always, resulting in
channel_updates preceeding the announcement.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We should never be evicting channel_announcements because a) they were
deeply buried and should not change the short_channel_id/tag, b) they
are static.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_blkid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If channel_announce is rebroadcast, it should replace the existing one
in-place. We currently only do this if we start from the unsigned one
and replace it with the signed one when we hit 6 confirms.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This check is expensive, so just restrict msatoshi going in, as well
as turn off channels charging more than 24x fee.
# 1M nodes:
$ /gossipd/test/run-bench-find_route 1000000 1 > /tmp/out
=> 44164 msec
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can't get them; channel_update doesn't support it.
# 1M nodes:
$ /gossipd/test/run-bench-find_route 1000000 1 > /tmp/out
=> 47677 msec
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This will later be used to determine whether or not we should announce
ourselves as a node.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
In future it will have TOR support, so the name will be awkward.
We collect the to/fromwire functions in common/wireaddr.c, and the
parsing functions in lightningd/netaddress.c.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It makes it impossible to embed an ipaddr in another structure, since we
always try to skip over any zeroes, which may swallow a following field.
Do the skip specially for the case where we're parsing routing messages:
we never use padding for our own internal messages anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. The code to skip over padding didn't take into account max.
2. It also didn't use symbolic names.
3. We are not supposed to fail on unknown addresses, just stop parsing.
4. We don't use the read_ip/write_ip code, so get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I missed these when I removed the legacy daemon. We also remove the
min_blocks field which was always 0.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Use a negative timestamp as the flag for this, making the test simple.
This allows valgrind to detect that we're accessing them prematurely,
including across the wire on gossip_getchannels_entry.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I had a routing problem, and wrote a simple unit test which passed. So
I wrote one which copied the failure case (and importantly, had a non-1
fee factor), which triggerd it.
In that real example, we underflowed which resulted in us not finding
a route. Simply don't consider routes which are infinite.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we initialize last_timestamp to 0, we ignore any initial update
with this timestamp. Don't compare it if we don't already have an
update, and don't initialize it, so valgrind can tell us if we use
it accidentally.
b'lightning_gossipd(3368): TRACE: Received channel_update for channel 6892:2:1(0)'
b'lightning_gossipd(3368): TRACE: Ignoring outdated update.'
b'lightning_gossipd(3368): TRACE: Received channel_update for channel 6893:2:1(1)'
b'lightning_gossipd(3368): TRACE: Channel 6893:2:1(1) was updated.'
The same logic applies to node_updates, so we do the same there.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
