We'll pass this down to gossip and make sure to re-announce/update
channels every so often. This is also used as a pruning timer, i.e.,
channels that have not been updated in 2 x channel-update-interval
will be pruned from the local view.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Since most callers use positional arguments, we should allow a 'null'
literal where we require no value at all.
Also adds some more value tests.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
'rhash' is the old terminology, but 'payment_preimage' and
'payment_hash' were decided on for the BOLTs, so we should fix that here.
We still use rhash internally, but that's much easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Different commands (listinvoice, delinvoice, waitinvoice,
waitanyinvoice) returned different fields, as not all were updated.
This makes them uniform.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This reuses the same code internally, and also now means that we deal
correctly with "any" msatoshi invoices: the old code would a return
'msatoshi' of 0 in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The manfile and the online help use 'msatoshi', the returned
response uses 'msatoshi', nearly every invoice-related
monetary amount is labelled 'msatoshi' and not 'amount'.
It would be nice if bitcoind had an RPC to do this in one, but that's
a bit much to ask for. We could also hand around proofs, for lite nodes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. htlc->fail has been changed to a u8 *.
2. wallet_get_newindex saves to the db.
3. peer->next_htlc_id is saved to the db in peer_save_commitsig_sent() below.
4. We do store commit in peer_save_commitsig_received(peer, commitnum),
and the fixme below talks about HTLC sigs.
5. We do commit shachain and next_per_commit_point in wallet_shachain_add_hash
and update_per_commit_point respectively.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
All other users of json_get_params(...) check the return value:
```
lightningd/chaintopology.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/chaintopology.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/dev_ping.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/gossip_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params, "label", &labeltok, NULL)) {
lightningd/invoice.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/jsonrpc.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/pay.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/pay.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
lightningd/peer_control.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
wallet/walletrpc.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params,
wallet/walletrpc.c: if (!json_get_params(buffer, params, "tx", &txtok, NULL)) {
```
I've only seen this under travis, so I can't verify that this fixes it,
but it's certainly a bug which could cause that issue.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is necessary to grad the their_unilateral/to-us outputs since
they aren't being harvested by `onchaind`
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is the scriptpubkey that onchaind spends all funds to, except for
the their_unilateral/to-us case, so we better recognize that address.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is the only case in which we don't respend to a simple keyindex'd
pubkey, so we need to handle this for future spends.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We always arm the funding_lockin_cb, even if we don't need to. If we
have an short_channel_id already from the db, this was replacing it
and leaking the old one.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we panic when we see our root reorg out, even if we're not doing
anything yet, restoring the 100 block margin is the simplest fix.
Unfortunately this means adding a 100-block spacer in the tests, so things
don't get confused.
Fixes: #511
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
