To avoid everything pulling in HTLCs stuff to the opening daemon, we
split the channel and commit_tx routines into initial_channel and
initial_commit_tx (no HTLC support) and move full HTLC supporting versions
into channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Now we're always sync, just use an fd. Put the hsm_sync_read() helper
here, too, and do HSM init sync which makes things much simpler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Wallet should really be the container for anything bip32 related, so
I'd like to slowly wean off of `ld->bip32_base` in favor of
`ld->wallet->bip32_base`
This matters in one case: channeld receiving a bad message is a
permenant failure, whereas losing a connection is transient.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather a big commit, but I couldn't figure out how to split it
nicely. It introduces a new message from the channel to the master
signaling that the channel has been announced, so that the master can
take care of announcing the node itself. A provisorial announcement is
created and passed to the HSM, which signs it and passes it back to
the master. Finally the master injects it into gossipd which will take
care of broadcasting it.
Instead of reusing HSMFD_ECDH, we have an explicit channeld hsm fd,
which can do ECDH and will soon do channel announce signatures as well.
Based-on: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For the moment this is simply handed through to lightningd for
generating the per-peer secrets; eventually the HSM should keep it and
all peer secret key operations would be done via HSM-ops.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's a bit messy, since some status messages are accompanied by an FD:
in this case, the handler returns STATUS_NEED_FD and we read that then
re-call the handler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
