pytest: failing test for overflow in query_channel_range

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
Rusty Russell 2019-01-15 20:03:25 +10:30 committed by neil saitug
parent 52750f2dcc
commit ba41d6e3df

View File

@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ def test_routing_gossip(node_factory, bitcoind):
@unittest.skipIf(not DEVELOPER, "needs DEVELOPER=1")
@pytest.mark.xfail(strict=True)
def test_gossip_query_channel_range(node_factory, bitcoind):
l1, l2, l3, l4 = node_factory.line_graph(4, opts={'log-level': 'io'},
fundchannel=False)
@ -682,6 +683,16 @@ def test_gossip_query_channel_range(node_factory, bitcoind):
assert ret['short_channel_ids'][1] == scid23
l2.daemon.wait_for_log('queue_channel_ranges full: splitting')
# Test overflow case doesn't split forever; should only get 32 for this.
ret = l1.rpc.dev_query_channel_range(id=l2.info['id'],
first=1,
num=429496000)
l1.daemon.wait_for_logs([r'\[IN\] 0108'] * 32)
# And no more!
time.sleep(1)
assert not l1.daemon.is_in_log(r'\[IN\] 0108', start=l1.daemon.logsearch_start)
# This should actually be large enough for zlib to kick in!
l3.fund_channel(l4, 10**5)
bitcoind.generate_block(5)