mirrors/core-lightning
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning.git synced 2025-01-18 21:35:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

opening: clearer messages for negotiation failures.

Browse Source 
'negotiation_failed' is currently just a useless wrapper around
peer_failed (a vestige from when peer_failed would close the
connection).  Change it to send different local and remote messages,
and use it wherever we dislike their parameters: stick with
peer_failed if we dislike our own parameters.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
Rusty Russell 2018-03-19 09:55:46 +10:30 committed by Christian Decker
parent 21fbae6df8
commit 429c853fac
1 changed files with 36 additions and 26 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

62
openingd/opening.c
View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <common/crypto_sync.h>
#include <common/derive_basepoints.h>
#include <common/funding_tx.h>
#include <common/gen_peer_status_wire.h>
#include <common/initial_channel.h>
#include <common/key_derive.h>
#include <common/peer_billboard.h>
@ -67,18 +68,29 @@ struct state {
const struct chainparams *chainparams;
};
/* For negotiation failures: we can still gossip with client. */
/* For negotiation failures: we tell them it's their fault. Same
* as peer_failed, with slightly different local and remote wording. */
static void negotiation_failed(struct state *state, const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list ap;
const char *errmsg;
u8 *msg;
va_start(ap, fmt);
errmsg = tal_vfmt(state, fmt, ap);
va_end(ap);
peer_billboard(true, errmsg);
msg = towire_status_peer_error(NULL, &state->channel_id,
errmsg, &state->cs, state->gossip_index,
towire_errorfmt(errmsg,
&state->channel_id,
"You gave bad parameters:%s",
errmsg));
tal_free(errmsg);
status_send_fatal(take(msg), PEER_FD, GOSSIP_FD);
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index, &state->channel_id,
"%s", errmsg);
"You gave bad parameters: %s", errmsg);
}
static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
@ -112,8 +124,8 @@ static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
/* Overflow check before capacity calc. */
if (remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis > state->funding_satoshis)
negotiation_failed(state,
"Invalid channel_reserve_satoshis %"PRIu64
" for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64,
"channel_reserve_satoshis %"PRIu64
" too large for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64,
remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis,
state->funding_satoshis);
@ -129,8 +141,8 @@ static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
if (remoteconf->htlc_minimum_msat * (u64)1000 > capacity_msat)
negotiation_failed(state,
"Invalid htlc_minimum_msat %"PRIu64
" for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64
"htlc_minimum_msat %"PRIu64
" too large for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64
" capacity_msat %"PRIu64,
remoteconf->htlc_minimum_msat,
state->funding_satoshis,
@ -138,7 +150,7 @@ static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
if (capacity_msat < state->min_effective_htlc_capacity_msat)
negotiation_failed(state,
"Channel capacity with funding %"PRIu64" msat,"
"channel capacity with funding %"PRIu64" msat,"
" reserves %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" msat,"
" max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat %"PRIu64
" is %"PRIu64" msat, which is below %"PRIu64" msat",
@ -161,10 +173,9 @@ static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
* than 483.
*/
if (remoteconf->max_accepted_htlcs > 483)
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index,
&state->channel_id,
"max_accepted_htlcs %u too large",
remoteconf->max_accepted_htlcs);
negotiation_failed(state,
"max_accepted_htlcs %u too large",
remoteconf->max_accepted_htlcs);
/* BOLT #2:
*
@ -174,12 +185,12 @@ static void check_config_bounds(struct state *state,
*/
if (remoteconf->dust_limit_satoshis
> remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis)
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index,
&state->channel_id,
"dust_limit_satoshis %"PRIu64
" too large for channel_reserve_satoshis %"PRIu64,
remoteconf->dust_limit_satoshis,
remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis);
negotiation_failed(state,
"dust_limit_satoshis %"PRIu64
" too large for channel_reserve_satoshis %"
PRIu64,
remoteconf->dust_limit_satoshis,
remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis);
}
/* We always set channel_reserve_satoshis to 1%, rounded up. */
@ -362,14 +373,14 @@ static u8 *funder_channel(struct state *state,
if (state->remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis
< state->localconf.dust_limit_satoshis)
negotiation_failed(state,
"Their channel reserve %"PRIu64
"channel reserve %"PRIu64
" would be below our dust %"PRIu64,
state->remoteconf->channel_reserve_satoshis,
state->localconf.dust_limit_satoshis);
if (state->localconf.channel_reserve_satoshis
< state->remoteconf->dust_limit_satoshis)
negotiation_failed(state,
"Their dust limit %"PRIu64
"dust limit %"PRIu64
" would be above our reserve %"PRIu64,
state->remoteconf->dust_limit_satoshis,
state->localconf.channel_reserve_satoshis);
@ -586,10 +597,9 @@ static u8 *fundee_channel(struct state *state,
* The receiving node ... MUST fail the channel if `funding-satoshis`
* is greater than or equal to 2^24 */
if (state->funding_satoshis > MAX_FUNDING_SATOSHI)
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index,
&state->channel_id,
"funding_satoshis %"PRIu64" too large",
state->funding_satoshis);
negotiation_failed(state,
"funding_satoshis %"PRIu64" too large",
state->funding_satoshis);
/* BOLT #2:
*
@ -599,8 +609,8 @@ static u8 *fundee_channel(struct state *state,
if (state->push_msat > state->funding_satoshis * 1000)
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index,
&state->channel_id,
"push_msat %"PRIu64
" too large for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64,
"Our push_msat %"PRIu64
" would be too large for funding_satoshis %"PRIu64,
state->push_msat, state->funding_satoshis);
/* BOLT #2:
@ -704,7 +714,7 @@ static u8 *fundee_channel(struct state *state,
if (!state->channel)
peer_failed(&state->cs, state->gossip_index,
&state->channel_id,
"could not create channel with given config");
"We could not create channel with given config");
/* BOLT #2:
*