mirrors/core-lightning
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning.git synced 2025-01-18 05:12:45 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test-cli/scripts/test.sh: basic HTLC spending test.

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
Rusty Russell 2015-08-07 12:46:59 +09:30
parent fcbba0280d
commit 3b214479ae
1 changed files with 56 additions and 24 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

80
test-cli/scripts/test.sh
View File

@ -22,22 +22,26 @@ send_after_delay()
# triggered if we have < 11 blocks. Generate them now.
for i in `seq 11`; do scripts/generate-block.sh; done
# OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY will stop us spending for 60 seconds.
if $CLI sendrawtransaction $1 2>/dev/null; then
echo OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY broken! >&2
exit 1
fi
# Mine it.
for tx; do
if $CLI sendrawtransaction $tx 2>/dev/null; then
echo OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY broken! >&2
exit 1
fi
done
# Confirm them.
scripts/generate-block.sh
echo Waiting for CSV timeout. >&2
sleep 61
# Move median time, for sure!
for i in `seq 11`; do scripts/generate-block.sh; done
fi
$CLI sendrawtransaction $1
for tx; do
$CLI sendrawtransaction $tx
done
}
if [ $# = 0 ]; then
echo Usage: "INPUT" "[--steal|--unilateral]" >&2
echo Usage: "INPUT" "[--steal|--unilateral|--htlc-onchain]" >&2
exit 1
fi
@ -116,8 +120,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="-- +B-commit-sig.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-0.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-0.tx
# Now, update the channel, so I pay you 60000 satoshi (covers 50000 fee)
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=60000 $A_SEED 1 > A-update-1.pb
# Now, update the channel, so I pay you 80000 satoshi (covers 50000 fee)
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=80000 $A_SEED 1 > A-update-1.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS +A-update-1.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-1.pb"
@ -137,8 +141,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-complete-1.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-1.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-1.tx
# Now you pay me 250.
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=250 $B_SEED 2 > B-update-2.pb
# Now you pay me 5000.
$PREFIX ./update-channel --to-them=5000 $B_SEED 2 > B-update-2.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-2.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-2.pb"
@ -158,8 +162,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-complete-2.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-2.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-2.tx
# Now, A offers an HTLC for 50 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $A_SEED 3 50 $A_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > A-update-htlc-3.pb
# Now, A offers an HTLC for 10001 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $A_SEED 3 10001 $A_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > A-update-htlc-3.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS +A-update-htlc-3.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-htlc-3.pb"
@ -179,8 +183,8 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-complete-3.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-3.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-3.tx
# Now, B offers an HTLC for 100 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $B_SEED 4 100 $B_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > B-update-htlc-4.pb
# Now, B offers an HTLC for 10002 satoshi.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc $B_SEED 4 10002 $B_HTLC1 $((`date +%s` + 60)) > B-update-htlc-4.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-htlc-4.pb"
B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS +B-update-htlc-4.pb"
@ -200,6 +204,33 @@ B_UPDATE_PKTS="$B_UPDATE_PKTS -A-update-complete-4.pb"
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_TMPKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-commit-4.tx
$PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_PKTS > B-commit-4.tx
# Solve the HTLCs with the R value on the chain.
if [ x"$1" = x--htlc-onchain ]; then
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
# Now, B can claim A's HTLC using R value.
# It's A's commit tx, so most of cmdline is written from A's POV.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --rvalue=$A_HTLC1 -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-3-spend.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-3-spend.tx` > B-htlc-3-spend.txid
# A can claim using B's HTLC using R value, after delay.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --rvalue=$B_HTLC1 -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY > A-htlc-4-spend.tx
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-htlc-4-spend.tx` > A-htlc-4-spend.txid
exit 0
fi
if [ x"$1" = x--unilateral ]; then
# Use commit-4, which has htlcs.
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
$PREFIX ./create-commit-spend-tx A-commit-4.tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-spend.tx
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY > A-htlc-3-spend.tx
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-4-spend.tx
# HTLCs conveniently set to 60 seconds, though absolute. Script
# shouldn't be that slow, so they should be unspendable to start.
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-spend.tx` `cut -d: -f1 A-htlc-3-spend.tx` `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-4-spend.tx` > A-spend.txids
exit 0
fi
# B completes A's HTLC using R value.
$PREFIX ./update-channel-htlc-complete $B_SEED 5 $A_HTLC1 > B-update-htlc-complete-5.pb
A_UPDATE_PKTS="$A_UPDATE_PKTS -B-update-htlc-complete-5.pb"
@ -244,19 +275,20 @@ $PREFIX ./create-commit-tx B-open.pb A-open.pb A-anchor.pb $B_TMPKEY $B_UPDATE_P
if [ x"$1" = x--steal ]; then
# A stupidly broadcasts a revoked transaction.
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-1.tx` > A-commit-1.txid
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-4.tx` > A-commit-4.txid
# B uses the preimage from A-update-complete-2 to cash in.
$PREFIX ./create-steal-tx A-commit-1.tx A-update-complete-2.pb $B_FINALKEY B-open.pb A-open.pb $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-commit-steal.tx
# B uses the preimage from A-update-complete-5 to cash in.
$PREFIX ./create-steal-tx A-commit-4.tx A-update-complete-5.pb $B_FINALKEY B-open.pb A-open.pb $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-commit-steal.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-commit-steal.tx` > B-commit-steal.txid
exit 0
fi
if [ x"$1" = x--unilateral ]; then
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 A-commit-2.tx` > A-commit-2.txid
$PREFIX ./create-commit-spend-tx A-commit-2.tx A-open.pb B-open.pb A-anchor.pb $A_FINALKEY $A_CHANGEPUBKEY $A_UPDATE_PKTS > A-spend.tx
send_after_delay `cut -d: -f1 A-spend.tx` > A-spend.txid
# Now B uses the same preimage to get the HTLC amounts too.
# It's A's commit tx, so most of cmdline is written from A's POV.
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --commit-preimage=A-update-complete-5.pb -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx +A-update-htlc-3.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-steal-1.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-steal-1.tx` > B-htlc-steal-1.txid
$PREFIX ./create-htlc-spend-tx --commit-preimage=A-update-complete-5.pb -- A-open.pb B-open.pb A-commit-4.tx -B-update-htlc-4.pb A-update-accept-4.pb $B_FINALKEY $B_CHANGEPUBKEY > B-htlc-steal-2.tx
$CLI sendrawtransaction `cut -d: -f1 B-htlc-steal-2.tx` > B-htlc-steal-2.txid
exit 0
fi