From defe023f6ec49dd64c6e03880cee0e9299b45762 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:34:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fuzz: add PrioritiseTransaction coverage in diagram checks

---
 src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp b/src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp
index 42008c6ad96..a3138629e24 100644
--- a/src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp
+++ b/src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp
@@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ FUZZ_TARGET(package_rbf, .init = initialize_package_rbf)
         }
         mempool_txs.emplace_back(*child);
         pool.addUnchecked(ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry(fuzzed_data_provider, mempool_txs.back()));
+
+        if (fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeBool()) {
+            pool.PrioritiseTransaction(mempool_txs.back().GetHash().ToUint256(), fuzzed_data_provider.ConsumeIntegralInRange<int32_t>(-100000, 100000));
+        }
     }
 
     // Pick some transactions at random to be the direct conflicts