mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
synced 2024-11-19 01:40:05 +01:00
959fecc15b
- Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status) - The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP - The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section
256 lines
9.3 KiB
Plaintext
256 lines
9.3 KiB
Plaintext
<pre>
|
|
BIP: 45
|
|
Layer: Applications
|
|
Title: Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets
|
|
Author: Manuel Araoz <manu@bitpay.com>
|
|
Ryan X. Charles <ryan@bitpay.com>
|
|
Matias Alejo Garcia <matias@bitpay.com>
|
|
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
|
|
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0045
|
|
Status: Proposed
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
|
Created: 2014-04-25
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
==Abstract==
|
|
|
|
This BIP defines a structure for hierarchical deterministic P2SH multi-party
|
|
multi-signature wallets (HDPM wallets from now on) based on the algorithm
|
|
described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on) and purpose scheme described in
|
|
BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on).
|
|
This BIP is a particular application of BIP43.
|
|
|
|
==Motivation==
|
|
|
|
The structure proposed in this document allows for standard ways to create,
|
|
use, import, and store HDPM wallets. It allows to handle multiple parties sharing
|
|
an m-of-n wallet, on the following assumptions:
|
|
* n parties share an m-of-n wallet.
|
|
* Each party generates their master private keys independently.
|
|
* Multisig P2SH is used for all addresses.
|
|
* BIP32 is used to derive public keys, then create a multisig script, and the corresponding P2SH address for that script.
|
|
* Address generation should not require communication between parties. (Thus, all parties must be able to generate all public keys)
|
|
* Transaction creation and signing requires communication between parties.
|
|
|
|
This BIP will allow interoperability between various HDPM wallet implementations.
|
|
|
|
==Specification==
|
|
|
|
We define the following levels in BIP32 path:
|
|
|
|
<code>
|
|
m / purpose' / cosigner_index / change / address_index
|
|
</code>
|
|
|
|
Apostrophe in the path indicates that BIP32 hardened derivation is used.
|
|
|
|
Each level has special meaning described in the chapters below.
|
|
|
|
===Purpose===
|
|
|
|
Purpose is a constant set to 45, following the BIP43 recommendation.
|
|
It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this specification.
|
|
|
|
<code>
|
|
m / 45' / *
|
|
</code>
|
|
|
|
Hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
===Cosigner Index===
|
|
|
|
The index of the party creating a P2SH multisig address. The indices can
|
|
be determined independently by lexicographically sorting the purpose public
|
|
keys of each cosigner. Each cosigner creates addresses on it's own branch,
|
|
even though they have independent extended master public key, as explained
|
|
in the "Address generation" section.
|
|
|
|
Note that the master public key is not shared amongst the cosigners. Only the
|
|
hardened purpose extended public key is shared, and this is what is used to
|
|
derive child extended public keys.
|
|
|
|
Software should only use indices corresponding to each of the N cosigners
|
|
sequentially. For example, for a 2-of-3 HDPM wallet, having the following
|
|
purpose public keys:
|
|
<pre>
|
|
03a473275a750a20b7b71ebeadfec83130c014da4b53f1c4743fcf342af6589a38
|
|
039863fb5f07b667d9b1ca68773c6e6cdbcac0088ffba9af46f6f6acd153d44463
|
|
03f76588e06c0d688617ef365d1e58a7f1aa84daa3801380b1e7f12acc9a69cd13
|
|
</pre>
|
|
|
|
it should use `m / 45 ' / 0 / *` for
|
|
`039863fb5f07b667d9b1ca68773c6e6cdbcac0088ffba9af46f6f6acd153d44463`,
|
|
`m / 45 ' / 1 / *` for
|
|
`03a473275a750a20b7b71ebeadfec83130c014da4b53f1c4743fcf342af6589a38`,
|
|
and `m / 45 ' / 2 / *` for
|
|
`03f76588e06c0d688617ef365d1e58a7f1aa84daa3801380b1e7f12acc9a69cd13`,
|
|
as dictated by their lexicographical order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software needs to discover all used indexes when importing the seed from
|
|
an external source. Such algorithm is described in "Address discovery" chapter.
|
|
|
|
Non-hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
|
|
|
===Change===
|
|
|
|
Constant 0 is used for external chain and constant 1 for internal chain (also
|
|
known as change addresses). External chain is used for addresses that are meant
|
|
to be visible outside of the wallet (e.g. for receiving payments). Internal
|
|
chain is used for addresses which are not meant to be visible outside of the
|
|
wallet and is used for return transaction change.
|
|
|
|
For example, if cosigner 2 wants to generate a change address, he would use
|
|
`m / 45 ' / 2 / 1 / *`, and `m / 45 ' / 2 / 0 / *` for a receive
|
|
address.
|
|
|
|
Non-hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
|
|
|
===Address Index===
|
|
|
|
Addresses are numbered from index 0 in sequentially increasing manner.
|
|
This number is used as child index in BIP32 derivation.
|
|
|
|
Non-hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
|
|
|
===HDPM Wallet High-level Description===
|
|
Each party generates their own extended master keypair and shares the
|
|
extended purpose' public key with the others, which is stored encrypted.
|
|
Each party can generate any of the other's derived public keys, but only
|
|
his own private keys.
|
|
|
|
===Address Generation Procedure===
|
|
When generating an address, each party can independently generate the N needed
|
|
public keys. They do this by deriving the public key in each of the different
|
|
trees, but using the same path. They can then generate the multisig script (by
|
|
lexicographically sorting the public keys) and the corresponding p2sh address.
|
|
In this way, each path corresponds to an address, but the public keys for that
|
|
address come from different trees.
|
|
|
|
====Receive address case====
|
|
Each cosigner generates addresses only on his own branch. One of the n
|
|
cosigners wants to receive a payment, and the others are offline. He
|
|
knows the last used index in his own branch, because only he generates
|
|
addresses there. Thus, he can generate the public keys for all of the
|
|
others using the next index, and calculate the needed script for the address.
|
|
|
|
Example: Cosigner #2 wants to receive a payment to the shared wallet. His last
|
|
used index on his own branch is 4. Then, the path for the next receive
|
|
address is `m/45'/2/0/5`. He uses this same path in all of the cosigners
|
|
trees to generate a public key for each one, and from that he gets the new
|
|
p2sh address.
|
|
====Change address case====
|
|
Again, each cosigner generates addresses only on his own branch. One of the
|
|
n cosigners wants to create an outgoing payment, for which he'll need a change
|
|
address. He generates a new address using the same procedure as above, but
|
|
using a separate index to track the used change addresses.
|
|
|
|
Example: Cosigner #5 wants to send a payment from the shared wallet, for which
|
|
he'll need a change address. His last used change index on his own branch is
|
|
11. Then, the path for the next change address is `m/45'/5/1/12`. He uses
|
|
this same path in all of the cosigners trees to generate a public key for each
|
|
one, and from that he gets the new p2sh address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
===Transaction creation and signing===
|
|
When creating a transaction, first one of the parties creates a Transaction
|
|
Proposal. This is a transaction that spends some output stored in any of the
|
|
p2sh multisig addresses (corresponding to any of the copayers' branches).
|
|
This proposal is sent to the other parties, who decide if they want to sign.
|
|
If they approve the proposal, they can generate their needed private key for
|
|
that specific address (using the same path that generated the public key in
|
|
that address, but deriving the private key instead), and sign it. Once the
|
|
proposal reaches m signatures, any cosigner can broadcast it to the network,
|
|
becoming final. The specifics of how this proposal is structured, and the
|
|
protocol to accept or reject it, belong to another BIP, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
===Address discovery===
|
|
|
|
When the master seed is imported from an external source the software should
|
|
start to discover the addresses in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
# for each cosigner:
|
|
# derive the cosigner's node (`m / 45' / cosigner_index`)
|
|
# for both the external and internal chains on this node (`m / 45' / cosigner_index / 0` and `m / 45' / cosigner_index / 1`):
|
|
# scan addresses of the chain; respect the gap limit described below
|
|
|
|
Please note that the algorithm uses the transaction history, not address
|
|
balances, so even if the address has 0 coins, the program should continue with discovery.
|
|
Opposite to BIP44, each cosigner branch needs to be checked,
|
|
even if the earlier ones don't have transactions
|
|
|
|
===Address gap limit===
|
|
|
|
Address gap limit is currently set to 20. If the software hits 20 unused
|
|
addresses (no transactions associated with that address) in a row, it expects
|
|
there are no used addresses beyond this point and stops searching the address chain.
|
|
|
|
Wallet software should warn when user is trying to exceed the gap limit on
|
|
an external chain by generating a new address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
===Rationale===
|
|
|
|
This stucture provides a general way of doing HDPM wallets between m-of-n
|
|
parties. Here are some explanations about the design decisions made.
|
|
|
|
The reason for using separate branches for each cosigner is we don't want
|
|
two of them generating the same address and receiving simultaneous payments
|
|
to it. The ideal case is that each address receives at most one payment,
|
|
requested by the corresponding cosigner.
|
|
|
|
==Examples==
|
|
|
|
{|
|
|
!cosigner_index
|
|
!change
|
|
!address_index
|
|
!path
|
|
|-
|
|
|first
|
|
|receive
|
|
|first
|
|
| m / 45' / 0 / 0 / 0
|
|
|-
|
|
|first
|
|
|receive
|
|
|second
|
|
| m / 45' / 0 / 0 / 1
|
|
|-
|
|
|first
|
|
|receive
|
|
|fifth
|
|
| m / 45' / 0 / 0 / 4
|
|
|-
|
|
|first
|
|
|change
|
|
|first
|
|
| m / 45' / 0 / 1 / 0
|
|
|-
|
|
|first
|
|
|change
|
|
|second
|
|
| m / 45' / 0 / 1 / 1
|
|
|-
|
|
|second
|
|
|receive
|
|
|first
|
|
| m / 45' / 1 / 0 / 0
|
|
|-
|
|
|third
|
|
|change
|
|
|tenth
|
|
| m / 45' / 2 / 1 / 9
|
|
|}
|
|
|
|
==Compatible walets==
|
|
|
|
* [[https://copay.io|Copay wallet]] ([[https://github.com/bitpay/copay|source]])
|
|
|
|
==Reference==
|
|
|
|
* [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP32 - Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets]]
|
|
* [[bip-0043.mediawiki|BIP43 - Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets]]
|
|
* [[https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05156.html|Original mailing list discussion]]
|