Johnson Lau
26a7293e67
Update bip-segwit.mediawiki
2015-12-22 20:56:18 -05:00
Eric Lombrozo
f026c28da5
MULICHECKSIG -> CHECKMULTISIG
...
n-of-m -> m-of-n
LN motivation
smaller SPV proof motivation
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
jl2012
1cdf145b9b
Update bip-segwit.mediawiki
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
Eric Lombrozo
1817685aa9
Added fraud proof motivation.
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
jl2012
7bce321a18
Create bip-segwit.mediawiki
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
MarcoPon
29b8eaef02
Some clarifications, typos
2015-12-21 15:39:29 +01:00
Dionysis Zindros
e84e2d5c38
Fix broken GitHub https URL
2015-12-21 15:39:26 +01:00
MarcoPon
01201d6ce5
Created bip-MarcoPon-01.mediawiki
...
URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration
2015-12-21 15:38:57 +01:00
Justus Ranvier
2f566884f4
update recent changes
2015-12-18 13:48:13 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
27848f7d6b
Clarify the definition of identity and the relationship to BIP-44
2015-12-18 13:40:54 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
650fa601ad
enumerate the list of script forms which can convey a notification pubkey
2015-12-18 10:47:49 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
a6f4ae5b5d
clarify wallet recovery procedure
2015-12-18 10:47:49 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
07ab320513
clarify the various types of child keys derived from an identity
2015-12-18 10:47:44 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
876af7fa87
add missing change notification and minor corrections
2015-12-18 10:45:02 -06:00
David A. Harding
b57eea446c
Add opt-in full-RBF signaling BIP
2015-12-11 11:45:59 -05:00
Luke-Jr
6bfc0151a7
Merge pull request #260 from btcdrak/bip68mtp
...
BIP68: update specification to assume MTP
2015-12-11 07:08:23 +00:00
Luke-Jr
99effc1c70
Merge pull request #254 from jl2012/patch-6
...
Full description of the behavior of OP_CLTV
2015-12-11 07:04:11 +00:00
BtcDrak
df9d34d537
Update deployment specification
...
BIP68 must be deployed with BIP113 because MTP calculations are
used by this BIP.
2015-12-10 21:38:43 +00:00
BtcDrak
7239c330c7
BIP68 now assume MTP in all instances
2015-12-10 20:01:35 +00:00
Kristov Atlas
385e3d7343
fix typo in block height of P2SH validation
2015-12-09 15:32:00 -05:00
jl2012
abc7ae83a0
Update bip-0065.mediawiki
...
the nLockTime feature may still be active as other inputs may not be final
2015-12-09 00:37:25 +08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
84779aa5c3
Merge pull request #258 from petertodd/bip65-fix-spec-missing-case
...
BIP65 formatting fixes
2015-12-08 10:35:00 +01:00
Luke-Jr
44f021979a
Merge pull request #252 from jl2012/patch-5
...
Corrections with the conditions for script failure
2015-12-07 20:34:40 +00:00
jl2012
004be2e822
Update bip-0065.mediawiki
2015-12-06 23:52:42 +08:00
Peter Todd
7cd2a7bdbb
Fix missing case statement at beginning of specification
...
Wasn't being displayed on github; adding an empty line prior to the spec
seems to fix this.
2015-12-05 18:06:38 +08:00
Peter Todd
0feb1209d0
Remove space in BIP66
...
Seems to be how people are writing BIP's these days.
2015-12-05 17:57:43 +08:00
Peter Todd
aa7cbf77a6
Minor: fix capitalisation
2015-12-05 17:57:31 +08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
9d3b68f8c4
Merge pull request #256 from techstoreclub/fix_bip0001_type
...
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
2015-12-04 12:06:07 +01:00
Andy Chase
6f0c335b18
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
...
Previously BIP-0001 listed in its header preamble that is was a "Standards Track"
type proposal. This conflicts with both its own definition of "Standards Track"
proposal as well as the type listed in PEP-0001 of which BIP-0001 is based on.
Defitions of each type of proposal:
A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations.
An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature.
A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process.
Specifically: "Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP."
Based on these definitions BIP-0001 should have always been labeled as a "Process" BIP and this patch corrects this.
2015-12-04 02:48:43 -08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
b1ae7bad0f
Merge pull request #255 from bitcoin/2015_12_bip1
...
Change BIP1 to status Active
2015-12-02 12:30:07 +01:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
7576a135dd
Change BIP1 to status Active
...
From the text: "Some Informational and Process BIPs may also have a
status of "Active" if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. BIP 1
(this BIP)."
2015-12-01 21:04:24 +01:00
jl2012
71dd5c44e8
Full description of the behavior of the OP_CLTV
2015-12-02 02:03:30 +08:00
jl2012
ac4cd1d46c
Corrections with the conditions for script failure
2015-12-01 01:47:16 +08:00
Luke-Jr
0cd94c9f72
Merge pull request #245 from btcdrak/bip68sync
...
BIP68: Simplify language and update for current implementation
2015-11-28 22:33:57 +00:00
BtcDrak
a8e0d0f4c7
Small fixup
2015-11-28 22:30:58 +00:00
Luke-Jr
0ce74af5e8
Merge pull request #249 from bitstein/master
...
BIP47: fix typo
2015-11-28 20:46:46 +00:00
Luke-Jr
af7c75f40a
Merge pull request #238 from jwilkins/bip_103_squashed
...
Bip 103 squashed
2015-11-28 19:16:55 +00:00
Luke-Jr
dd208025cd
Merge pull request #248 from btcdrak/bip112sync
...
BIP112: Update document to match implementation
2015-11-28 19:14:04 +00:00
Dionysis Zindros
7abd750988
Fix small typo in BIP 0016
2015-11-28 04:27:46 +02:00
Luke-Jr
824284d422
Merge pull request #243 from CodeShark/BIP0112_revisions
...
BIP-0112 minor revision to text.
2015-11-26 00:27:06 +00:00
BtcDrak
86d1358256
Update deployment to be TBD
2015-11-25 18:53:09 +00:00
BtcDrak
0026fcb929
Use optimised script examples
...
Taken from 20/11/15 version of deployable lightning
2015-11-25 18:48:39 +00:00
BtcDrak
8d85335f2a
Fixup comment
2015-11-24 17:44:54 +00:00
BtcDrak
d30f1c6d0b
More clearly define script execution failure pathway
2015-11-24 16:01:53 +00:00
XBTdev
421c88ca2e
add copay link to bip44 compatible wallets list
...
add copay link to bip44 compatible wallets list
2015-11-24 00:54:04 -08:00
Michael Goldstein
565cc313a6
fix typo
2015-11-23 15:14:59 -06:00
BtcDrak
4048f45316
BIP112: Update document to match implementation
2015-11-23 20:56:43 +00:00
BtcDrak
8ad8cad875
Rename flags in code example to match implementation
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
BtcDrak
83fc19d97a
Improve title, add encoding diagram and small fixup
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
BtcDrak
f26cc0c4d3
Clarify (1 << 22) logic
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
