Chris Priest
a07c8b62b3
formatting changes
2015-12-04 14:40:38 -08:00
Chris Priest
e97833688d
removed reference to version 2
2015-12-04 14:40:01 -08:00
Chris Priest
d982c11f87
fixed formatting
2015-12-04 14:37:51 -08:00
Chris Priest
632bf07252
typo
2015-12-04 14:34:53 -08:00
Chris Priest
3ff75f1ad2
added part about version field
2015-12-04 14:32:24 -08:00
Matt David
e71e57216b
- Fix section levels
...
- Add Message Interaction Details + new mimetypes
2015-12-04 13:26:50 -08:00
Matt David
845f24069b
Fix last links
2015-12-04 11:40:43 -08:00
Matt David
c91ec76f41
Remove anchors
2015-12-04 11:33:06 -08:00
Matt David
2d9b626d6c
Test anchor
2015-12-04 11:31:38 -08:00
Matt David
61cfbaefa7
Remove anchor template and use spans for anchors instead
2015-12-04 11:29:44 -08:00
Matt David
543409c7f7
Fix local anchors and links
2015-12-04 11:26:32 -08:00
Matt David
2c8bc2392b
Updated BIP based on colleague feedback
...
- Removed Requestor/Responder definitions
- Seperated ECDH secret point generation and AES-256 (CBC Mode) setup from individual steps (listed twice) and created it's own section
- Added InvoiceRequest Validation section
2015-12-04 11:10:01 -08:00
T Dev D
8dcddf5267
Add link to BIP47 test vectors
...
Results obtained upon implementing BIP47 for Samourai Wallet. Payment codes are calculated assuming v1 specification without use of BitMessage. Also assumes notification transaction from Alice to Bob has been sent.
2015-12-04 15:27:39 +00:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
9d3b68f8c4
Merge pull request #256 from techstoreclub/fix_bip0001_type
...
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
2015-12-04 12:06:07 +01:00
Andy Chase
6f0c335b18
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
...
Previously BIP-0001 listed in its header preamble that is was a "Standards Track"
type proposal. This conflicts with both its own definition of "Standards Track"
proposal as well as the type listed in PEP-0001 of which BIP-0001 is based on.
Defitions of each type of proposal:
A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations.
An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature.
A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process.
Specifically: "Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP."
Based on these definitions BIP-0001 should have always been labeled as a "Process" BIP and this patch corrects this.
2015-12-04 02:48:43 -08:00
Matt David
a876e47bd1
Fix mediawiki table formatting
2015-12-03 17:32:01 -08:00
Matt David
d698201463
Fix mediawiki table formatting
2015-12-03 17:31:09 -08:00
Matt David
4e3b9a5b06
Fix mediawiki table formatting
2015-12-03 17:30:04 -08:00
Matt David
94c23ddffd
Initial version of invoicerequest extension BIP
2015-12-03 17:24:29 -08:00
Chris Priest
bec0d9e8f6
added 'needed to implement' section
2015-12-02 14:44:26 -08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
b1ae7bad0f
Merge pull request #255 from bitcoin/2015_12_bip1
...
Change BIP1 to status Active
2015-12-02 12:30:07 +01:00
Chris Priest
a5093f1c4a
added more stuff
2015-12-01 13:14:55 -08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
7576a135dd
Change BIP1 to status Active
...
From the text: "Some Informational and Process BIPs may also have a
status of "Active" if they are never meant to be completed. E.g. BIP 1
(this BIP)."
2015-12-01 21:04:24 +01:00
jl2012
71dd5c44e8
Full description of the behavior of the OP_CLTV
2015-12-02 02:03:30 +08:00
Chris Priest
bd5e1ead70
added txver2
2015-11-30 16:40:31 -08:00
jl2012
ac4cd1d46c
Corrections with the conditions for script failure
2015-12-01 01:47:16 +08:00
Luke-Jr
0cd94c9f72
Merge pull request #245 from btcdrak/bip68sync
...
BIP68: Simplify language and update for current implementation
2015-11-28 22:33:57 +00:00
BtcDrak
a8e0d0f4c7
Small fixup
2015-11-28 22:30:58 +00:00
Eric Lombrozo
94820a96b5
Removed deploytime parameter.
2015-11-28 16:32:08 -05:00
Luke-Jr
0ce74af5e8
Merge pull request #249 from bitstein/master
...
BIP47: fix typo
2015-11-28 20:46:46 +00:00
Luke-Jr
af7c75f40a
Merge pull request #238 from jwilkins/bip_103_squashed
...
Bip 103 squashed
2015-11-28 19:16:55 +00:00
Luke-Jr
dd208025cd
Merge pull request #248 from btcdrak/bip112sync
...
BIP112: Update document to match implementation
2015-11-28 19:14:04 +00:00
Dionysis Zindros
7abd750988
Fix small typo in BIP 0016
2015-11-28 04:27:46 +02:00
Luke-Jr
824284d422
Merge pull request #243 from CodeShark/BIP0112_revisions
...
BIP-0112 minor revision to text.
2015-11-26 00:27:06 +00:00
BtcDrak
86d1358256
Update deployment to be TBD
2015-11-25 18:53:09 +00:00
BtcDrak
0026fcb929
Use optimised script examples
...
Taken from 20/11/15 version of deployable lightning
2015-11-25 18:48:39 +00:00
BtcDrak
8d85335f2a
Fixup comment
2015-11-24 17:44:54 +00:00
BtcDrak
d30f1c6d0b
More clearly define script execution failure pathway
2015-11-24 16:01:53 +00:00
XBTdev
421c88ca2e
add copay link to bip44 compatible wallets list
...
add copay link to bip44 compatible wallets list
2015-11-24 00:54:04 -08:00
Michael Goldstein
565cc313a6
fix typo
2015-11-23 15:14:59 -06:00
BtcDrak
4048f45316
BIP112: Update document to match implementation
2015-11-23 20:56:43 +00:00
BtcDrak
8ad8cad875
Rename flags in code example to match implementation
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
BtcDrak
83fc19d97a
Improve title, add encoding diagram and small fixup
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
BtcDrak
f26cc0c4d3
Clarify (1 << 22) logic
2015-11-23 09:53:31 +00:00
BtcDrak
060c37f6d5
Add note about free bits and correct deployment recommendations
2015-11-20 18:56:00 +00:00
BtcDrak
c141645a1f
Update compatibility section
2015-11-20 18:56:00 +00:00
BtcDrak
7d7083f722
clarify specification further
2015-11-20 18:56:00 +00:00
BtcDrak
2bc1979601
Edits from kinoshitajona
2015-11-20 15:11:01 +00:00
BtcDrak
b5bc89a67c
BIP68: Simplify language and update for current implementation
2015-11-20 10:52:05 +00:00
Luke-Jr
641b91ba28
Merge pull request #244 from sipa/bip62dead
...
Mark BIP62 as withdrawn
2015-11-17 21:39:55 +00:00
