From 633f94d0056dd3aec8ed89343fcfa37f8905e117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "nicolas.dorier" Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 08:39:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] This BIP replace 79 --- bip-xxxx.mediawiki | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bip-xxxx.mediawiki b/bip-xxxx.mediawiki index fb14013e..7334e30c 100644 --- a/bip-xxxx.mediawiki +++ b/bip-xxxx.mediawiki @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ Layer: Applications Title: A Simple Payjoin Proposal Author: Nicolas Dorier + Replaces: 79 Comments-Summary: No comments yet. Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-X Status: Draft @@ -52,7 +53,6 @@ Another implementation proposal has been written: [[https://github.com/bitcoin/b We decided to deviate from it for several reasons: * It was not using PSBT, so if the receiver wanted to bump the fee, they would need the full UTXO set. * The receiver was responsible to pay the additional fee, not the sender. -* It was requiring at least one input to be contributed by the receiver. * Inability to change the payment output to match scriptPubKey type. * Lack of basic versioning negotiation if the protocol evolves. * No standardization of error condition for proper feedback to the sender.