mirrors/bitcoin-bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-02-24 07:28:03 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #824 from kallewoof/2019-08-bip322-fix-abstract

Browse source 
BIP322: added background
This commit is contained in:
Luke Dashjr 2019-08-28 04:46:30 +00:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 33e6283a68
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 13 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
bip-0322.mediawiki
View file

@ -15,6 +15,17 @@
A standard for interoperable generic signed messages based on the Bitcoin Script format.
== Background ==
* Assume two actors, a prover <code>P</code> and a verifier <code>V</code>.
* <code>P</code> wants to prove that they own the private key <code>k</code> associated with a given address <code>A</code> (which in turn is derived from the pubkey <code>kG</code>).
* Let <code>V</code> generate a message <code>M</code> and hand this to <code>P</code>.
* <code>P</code> generates a signature <code>S</code> by signing the message <code>M</code> using <code>k</code>. Given <code>S</code>, <code>V</code> can prove that <code>P</code> has the private key associated with <code>A</code>.
The astute reader will notice that the above is missing a critical part, namely the pubkey <code>kG</code>, without which the verifier cannot actually verify the message. The current message signing standard solves this via a cryptographic trick, wherein the signature <code>S</code> above is a special "recoverable signature" type. Given the message <code>M</code> and the signature <code>S</code>, it is then possible to recover the pubkey <code>kG</code>. The system thus derives the address for the pubkey <code>kG</code>, and if it does not match <code>A</code>, the proof is deemed invalid.
While this is a neat trick, it unnecessarily restricts and complicates the message signing mechanism; for instance, it is currently not possible to sign a message for a P2SH address, because there is no pubkey to recover from the resulting signature.
== Motivation ==
The current message signing standard only works for P2PKH (1...) addresses. By extending it to use a Bitcoin Script based approach, it could be made more generic without causing a too big burden on implementers, who most likely have access to Bitcoin Script interpreters already.
@ -110,6 +121,8 @@ The resulting signature proof should be encoded using base64 encoding.
The "Verify" action takes as input a standard flags value, a script sig, an optional witness, and a purpose.
It emits one of INCONCLUSIVE, VALID, INVALID, or ERROR.
While omitted below, ERROR is returned if an unforeseen error occurs at any point in the process. A concrete example of this is if a legacy proof is given as input to a non-legacy address; the deserialization of the proof will fail in this case, and this should result in an ERROR result.
# Obtain the sighash and scriptPubKey from the purpose; pass on result code if not VALID
# Verify Script with flags=consensus flags (currently P2SH, DERSIG, NULLDUMMY, CLTV, CSV, WITNESS), scriptSig=script sig, scriptPubKey=scriptPubKey, witness=witness, and sighash=sighash
# Return INVALID if verification fails