mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
synced 2025-02-23 15:20:50 +01:00
Merge BIP 338
This commit is contained in:
commit
19c429ee28
2 changed files with 119 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -953,6 +953,13 @@ Those proposing changes should consider that ultimately consent may rest with th
|
|||
| Standard
|
||||
| Draft
|
||||
|-
|
||||
| [[bip-0338.mediawiki|338]]
|
||||
| Peer Services
|
||||
| Disable transaction relay message
|
||||
| Suhas Daftuar
|
||||
| Standard
|
||||
| Draft
|
||||
|-
|
||||
| [[bip-0339.mediawiki|339]]
|
||||
| Peer Services
|
||||
| WTXID-based transaction relay
|
||||
|
|
112
bip-0338.mediawiki
Normal file
112
bip-0338.mediawiki
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|||
<pre>
|
||||
BIP: 338
|
||||
Layer: Peer Services
|
||||
Title: Disable transaction relay message
|
||||
Author: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com>
|
||||
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
|
||||
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0338
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Standards Track
|
||||
Created: 2020-09-03
|
||||
License: BSD-2-Clause
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
==Abstract==
|
||||
|
||||
This BIP describes a change to the p2p protocol to allow a node to tell a peer
|
||||
that a connection will not be used for transaction relay, to support
|
||||
block-relay-only connections that are currently in use on the network.
|
||||
|
||||
==Motivation==
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal is part of an effort to increase the number of inbound
|
||||
connections that a peer can service, by distinguishing peers which will not
|
||||
relay transactions from those that do.
|
||||
|
||||
Since 2019, software has been deployed[1] which initiates
|
||||
connections on the Bitcoin network and sets the transaction relay field
|
||||
(introduced by BIP 37 and also defined in BIP 60) to false, to prevent
|
||||
transaction relay from occurring on the connection. Additionally, addr messages
|
||||
received from the peer are ignored by this software.
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of these connections is two-fold: by making additional
|
||||
low-bandwidth connections on which blocks can propagate, the robustness of a
|
||||
node to network partitioning attacks is strengthened. Additionally, by not
|
||||
relaying transactions and ignoring received addresses, the ability of an
|
||||
adversary to learn the complete network graph (or a subgraph) is reduced[2],
|
||||
which in turn increases the cost or difficulty to an attacker seeking to carry
|
||||
out a network partitioning attack (when compared with having such knowledge).
|
||||
|
||||
The low-bandwidth / minimal-resource nature of these connections is currently
|
||||
known only by the initiator of the connection; this is because the transaction
|
||||
relay field in the version message is not a permanent setting for the lifetime
|
||||
of the connection. Consequently, a node receiving an inbound connection with
|
||||
transaction relay disabled cannot distinguish between a peer that will never
|
||||
enable transaction relay (as described in BIP 37) and one that will. Moreover,
|
||||
the node also cannot determine that the incoming connection will ignore relayed
|
||||
addresses; with that knowledge a node would likely choose other peers to
|
||||
receive announced addresses instead.
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal adds a new, optional message that a node can send a peer when
|
||||
initiating a connection to that peer, to indicate that connection should not be
|
||||
used for transaction relay for the connection's lifetime. In addition, without
|
||||
a current mechanism to negotiate whether addresses should be relayed on a
|
||||
connection, this BIP suggests that address messages not be sent on links where
|
||||
transaction relay has been disabled.
|
||||
|
||||
After this BIP is deployed, nodes could more easily implement inbound
|
||||
connection limiting that differentiates low-resource nodes (such as those
|
||||
sending disabletx) from full-relay peers, potentially allowing for an increase
|
||||
in the number of block-relay-only connections that can be made on the network.
|
||||
|
||||
==Specification==
|
||||
|
||||
# A new disabletx message is added, which is defined as an empty message with message type set to "disabletx".
|
||||
# The protocol version of nodes implementing this BIP must be set to 70017 or higher.
|
||||
# If a node sets the transaction relay field in the version message to a peer to false, then the disabletx message MAY also be sent in response to a version message from that peer if the peer's protocol version is >= 70017. If sent, the disabletx message MUST be sent prior to sending a verack.
|
||||
# A node that has sent or received a disabletx message to/from a peer MUST NOT send any of these messages to the peer:
|
||||
## inv messages for transactions
|
||||
## getdata messages for transactions
|
||||
## getdata messages for merkleblock (BIP 37)
|
||||
## filteradd/filterload/filterclear (BIP 37)
|
||||
## mempool (BIP 35)
|
||||
## tx message
|
||||
# It is RECOMMENDED that a node that has sent or received a disabletx message to/from a peer not send any of these messages to the peer:
|
||||
## addr/getaddr
|
||||
## addrv2 (BIP 155)
|
||||
# The behavior regarding sending or processing other message types is not specified by this BIP.
|
||||
# Nodes MAY decide to not remain connected to peers that send this message (for example, if trying to find a peer that will relay transactions).
|
||||
|
||||
==Compatibility==
|
||||
|
||||
Nodes with protocol version >= 70017 that do not implement this BIP, and nodes
|
||||
with protocol version < 70017, will continue to remain compatible with
|
||||
implementing software: transactions would not be relayed to peers sending the
|
||||
disabletx message (provided that BIP 37 or BIP 60 has been implemented), and while
|
||||
periodic address relay may still take place, software implementing this BIP
|
||||
should not be disconnecting such peers solely for that reason.
|
||||
|
||||
Disabling address relay is suggested but not required by this BIP, to allow for
|
||||
future protocol extensions that might specify more carefully how address relay
|
||||
is to be negotiated. This BIP's recommendations for software to not relay
|
||||
addresses is intended to be interpreted as guidance in the absence of any such
|
||||
future protocol extension, to accommodate existing software behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that all messages specified in BIP 152, including blocktxn and
|
||||
getblocktxn, are permitted between peers that have sent/received a disabletx
|
||||
message, subject to the feature negotiation of BIP 152.
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal is compatible with, but independent of, BIP 37.
|
||||
|
||||
==Implementation==
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20726
|
||||
|
||||
==References==
|
||||
|
||||
# Bitcoin Core has [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15759 implemented this functionality] since version 0.19.0.1, released in November 2019.
|
||||
# For example, see https://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/coinscope/coinscope.pdf and https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.00942.pdf.
|
||||
|
||||
==Copyright==
|
||||
|
||||
This BIP is licensed under the 2-clause BSD license.
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue