mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
synced 2024-11-19 01:40:05 +01:00
BIP-0047: Reusable payment codes
Payment codes are SPV-friendly alternatives to DarkWallet-style stealth addresses which provide useful features such as positively identifying senders to recipients and automatically providing for transaction refunds. Payment codes can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life identity without causing a loss of financial privacy. Compared to stealth addresses, payment codes require less blockchain data storage. Payment codes require 65 bytes of OP_RETURN data per sender-recipient pair, while stealth addresses require 40 bytes per transaction.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7c05e17b3
commit
1612a0016a
236
bip-0047.mediawiki
Normal file
236
bip-0047.mediawiki
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
BIP: 47
|
||||
Title: Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets
|
||||
Authors: Justus Ranvier <justus@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Informational
|
||||
Created: 2015-04-24
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
==Abstract==
|
||||
|
||||
This BIP defines a technique for creating a payment code which can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life identity without creating the loss of security or privacy inherent to P2PKH address reuse.
|
||||
|
||||
This BIP is a particular application of BIP43 and is intended to supplement HD wallets which implement BIP44.
|
||||
|
||||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
|
||||
|
||||
==Motivation==
|
||||
|
||||
Payment codes add identity information to transactions which is useful in a merchant-customer interaction while protecting the privacy of users. Payment codes provide the privacy benefits of Darkwallet-style Stealth Addresses to SPV clients without requiring the assistance of a trusted full node and while greatly reducing reliance on blockchain storage.
|
||||
|
||||
==Path levels==
|
||||
|
||||
We define the following 3 levels in BIP32 path:
|
||||
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
m / purpose' / coin_type' / identity'
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
Apostrophe in the path indicates that BIP32 hardened derivation is used.
|
||||
|
||||
Each level has a special meaning, described in the chapters below.
|
||||
|
||||
===Purpose===
|
||||
|
||||
Purpose is a constant set following the BIP43 recommendation to: the ASCII value of "47" with the most signifigant bit set to indicate hardened derivation (0x8000002F). It indicates that the subtree of this node is used according to this specification.
|
||||
|
||||
Hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
||||
|
||||
===Coin type===
|
||||
|
||||
The coin type field is identical to the same field in BIP44
|
||||
|
||||
Hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
||||
|
||||
===Identity===
|
||||
|
||||
Identity is a particular extended public/private key pair. The extended public key is a payment code.
|
||||
|
||||
Identities SHOULD have 1:1 correspondence with a BIP44 account, as in each BIP44 account in an HD wallet should be assigned exactly one payment code which shares the same index value.
|
||||
|
||||
Hardened derivation is used at this level.
|
||||
|
||||
Except where noted, all keys derived from a payment code use the public derivation method.
|
||||
|
||||
====Binary Serialization====
|
||||
|
||||
A payment code contains the following elements:
|
||||
|
||||
* Byte 0: type. required value: 0x01
|
||||
* Byte 1: features bit field. All bits must be zero except where specified elsewhere in this specification
|
||||
** Bit 0: Bitmessage notification
|
||||
** Bits 1-7: reserved
|
||||
* Byte 2: sign. required value: 0x02 or 0x03
|
||||
* Bytes 3 - 34: x value
|
||||
* Bytes 35 - 66: chain code
|
||||
* Bytes 67 - 79: optional. reserved for future expansion
|
||||
|
||||
====Base58 Serialization====
|
||||
|
||||
When a payment code is presented to the user, it SHOULD be presented encoded in Base58Check form.
|
||||
|
||||
* The version byte is: 0x37 (produces a "P" as the first character of the serialized form)
|
||||
* The payload is the binary serialization of the payment code
|
||||
|
||||
===Protocol===
|
||||
|
||||
In the following examples, Alice and Bob are identities with a corresponding payment codes. Alice initiates a Bitcoin transaction, and Bob is the recipient of the transaction.
|
||||
|
||||
It is assumed that Alice can easily obtain Bob's payment code via a suitable method outside the scope of the payment code protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
====Definitions====
|
||||
|
||||
* Payment code: an extended public key which is associated with a particular identity
|
||||
* Notification address: the P2PKH address associated with the 0<sup>th</sup> public key derived from a payment code
|
||||
* Notification transaction: a transaction which sends an output to a notification address which includes an embedded payment code
|
||||
|
||||
====Notification Transaction====
|
||||
|
||||
Prior to the first time Alice initiates a transaction to Bob, Alice MUST inform Bob of her payment code via the following procedure:
|
||||
|
||||
# Alice constructs a transaction which sends a small quantity of bitcoins to Bob's notification address (notification transaction)
|
||||
## The inputs selected for this transaction MUST NOT be easily associated with Alice's notification address
|
||||
# Alice derives a unique shared secret using ECDH:
|
||||
## Alice selects the first exposed public key, of the first pubkey-exposing input, of the transaction: <pre>a</pre>
|
||||
## Alice selects the public key associated with Bob's notification address: <pre>B, where B = bG</pre>
|
||||
## Alice calculates a secret point: <pre>S = aB</pre>
|
||||
## Alice expresses the secret point in compressed DER format, then calculates a scalar shared secret: <pre>s = SHA256(S)</pre>
|
||||
# Alice serializes her payment code in binary form.
|
||||
# Alice renders her payment code (P) unreadable to anyone except Bob by:
|
||||
## Replace the x value with: <pre>s XOR (x value)</pre>
|
||||
## Replace the chain code with: <pre>sha256(s) XOR (chain code)</pre>
|
||||
# Alice adds an OP_RETURN output to her transaction which consists of P.
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-01.png" />
|
||||
|
||||
Now that Bob's client has received Alice's payment code, it is possible for Alice to send payments (up to 2<sup>32</sup> payments) to Bob.
|
||||
|
||||
Alice will never again need to send a notification transaction to Bob.
|
||||
|
||||
Bitcoins received via notification transactions require special handling in order to avoid privacy leaks:
|
||||
|
||||
# The value of outputs received to notification addresses MUST NOT be displayed to the user as part of their spendable balance.
|
||||
# Outputs received to notification addresses MUST NOT be used as inputs for any transaction that involve ECDH calculations using any of the user's payment codes.
|
||||
# Outputs received to notification addresses MAY be passed through a mixing service before being added to the user's spendable balance.
|
||||
# Outputs received to notification addresses MAY be donated to miners using dust-b-gone or an equivalent procedure.
|
||||
|
||||
====Sending====
|
||||
|
||||
# Each time Alice wants to initiate a transaction to Bob, Alice derives a unique P2PKH address for the transaction using ECDH follows:
|
||||
## Alice selects the 0th private key derived from her payment code: <pre>a</pre>
|
||||
## Alice selects the next unused public key derived from Bob's payment code, starting from zero: <pre>B, where B = bG</pre>
|
||||
### The "next unused" public key is based on an index specific to the Alice-Bob context, not global to either Alice or Bob
|
||||
## Alice calculates a secret point: <pre>S = aB</pre>
|
||||
## Alice expresses the secret point in compressed DER format, then calculates a scalar shared secret: <pre>s = SHA256(S)</pre>
|
||||
### If the value of s is not in the secp256k1 group, Alice MUST increment the index used to derive Bob's public key and try again.
|
||||
## Alice uses the scalar shared secret to calculate the ephemeral public key used to generate the P2PKH address for this transaction: <pre>B' = B + sG</pre>
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-04.png" />
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-05.png" />
|
||||
# Bob is watching for incoming payments on B' ever since he received the notification transaction from Alice.
|
||||
## Bob calculates n shared secrets with Alice, using the 0<sup>th</sup> public key derived Alice's payment code, and private keys 0 - n derived from Bob's payment code, where n is his desired lookahead window.
|
||||
## Bob calculates the ephemeral deposit addresses using the same procedure as Alice: <pre>B' = B + sG</pre>
|
||||
## Bob calculate the private key for each ephemeral address as: <pre>b' = b + s</pre>
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-02.png" />
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-03.png" />
|
||||
|
||||
====Refunds====
|
||||
|
||||
Because Bob learns Alice's payment code as part of the process of receiving a payment, Bob has all the information he needs in order to send a refund to Alice.
|
||||
|
||||
A refund transaction is identical to a payment transactions, with only the roles of the participants switches.
|
||||
|
||||
Bob MUST send a notification transaction to Alice prior to the first time he sends funds to Alice, even if he has received transactions from her in the past.
|
||||
|
||||
<img src="bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-06.png" />
|
||||
|
||||
====Anonymous Payments====
|
||||
|
||||
If Alice does not want her payment to Bob to be associated with her identity, she generates an ephemeral payment code to use for the transaction.
|
||||
|
||||
* Ephemeral payment codes are the hardened children of a payment code, starting from an index of zero.
|
||||
* An ephemeral payment code SHOULD only be used for a single outgoing payment.
|
||||
* The notification address of an ephemeral payment code MUST be monitored for notification transactions in order to detect incoming refund payments
|
||||
* The correspondence between BIP44 accounts and ephemeral payment codes is 1:many
|
||||
|
||||
====Cold Storage====
|
||||
|
||||
* Unlike traditional watching-only wallets, those associated with payment codes help in cold storage can not detect incoming payments immediately.
|
||||
* When the watching-only wallet detects an incoming notification transaction, it packages the transaction in an implementation-specific format suitable for transfer to the offline device.
|
||||
* The offline device recovers the payment code, then pre-generates a large number of relevant keypairs (example: 10000) in order to minimize the need for air gap round trips.
|
||||
* The offline device then packages the relevant public keys in an implementation-specific format suitable for transfer to the online device.
|
||||
* The online device can then watch for incoming payments using a suitable lookahead window.
|
||||
* If the lookahead window reaches the end of the pre-generated public keys, the user must generate more keys on the offline device and transfer them to the online device.
|
||||
|
||||
====Wallet Recovery====
|
||||
|
||||
Normal operation of a payment code-enabled wallet can be performed by an SPV client and does not require access to a complete copy of the blockchain.
|
||||
|
||||
Recovering a wallet from a seed, however, does require access to a fully-indexed blockchain.
|
||||
|
||||
The required data may be obtained from copy of the blockchain under the control of the user, or via a publicly-queriable blockchain explorer.
|
||||
|
||||
When querying a public blockchain explorer, wallets SHOULD connect to the explorer through Tor (or equivalent) and SHOULD avoid grouping queries in a manner that associates ephemeral addresses with each other.
|
||||
|
||||
Previously-spendable funds will generally not be lost or become inaccessible after a recovery from a seed, but all information regarding previous outgoing payments will be lost.
|
||||
|
||||
The metadata which a wallet must store regarding the state an identity consists of:
|
||||
|
||||
# A list of every payment code to which the identity has sent a notification transaction.
|
||||
## This list is lost if a wallet must be recovered from a seed.
|
||||
## The recovered wallet MUST send notification transactions as if it was a newly-created wallet
|
||||
# The index value corresponding to the next unused pubkey for each payment code on the previous list
|
||||
## This value can be recovered by checking each ephemeral deposit address in sequence for transactions.
|
||||
## Wallets MAY use a lookahead window capable of detecting gaps in the address sequence during this recovery operation.
|
||||
# The index value of the next unused ephemeral payment code.
|
||||
## Recovering all incoming funds associated with ephemeral payment codes with 100% certainty requires exhausting the entire 2<sup>32</sup> address space of potential ephemeral payment codes.
|
||||
### In most cases, less than 100% certainty is acceptable as long as a fallback "deep scan" is available as an option to the user.
|
||||
## The wallet checks the notification address for each ephemeral payment code for notification transactions in order to recover associated funds.
|
||||
## Since most ephemeral payment codes will not receive a refund transaction wallets SHOULD use a large lookahead window for this recovery operation.
|
||||
## The recovered value MUST be chosen as a number higher than any ephemeral payment code which has received a notification transaction.
|
||||
|
||||
===Wallet Sharing===
|
||||
|
||||
Wallets using payment codes generally should not be shared across multiple devices, given the need to synchronize metadata between each instance.
|
||||
|
||||
If wallets are shared between devices without a synchronization mechanism, undesirable address reuse can occur.
|
||||
|
||||
Wallets may perform an OPTIONAL check for existing transactions to an ephemeral deposit addresses prior to sending a transaction by checking a local copy of the blockchain or querying a public blockchain explorer via Tor or equivalent.
|
||||
|
||||
===Alternate Notification Methods===
|
||||
|
||||
In order to ensure that no funds will be lost in the event the recipient must recover their wallet from a seed, the sender MUST send a notification transaction the first time the sender interacts with a particular recipient.
|
||||
|
||||
A recipient MAY choose to designate alternate notification methods which the sender may use in addition to a notification transaction.
|
||||
|
||||
If the recipient specifies an alternate notification method, a compliant implementation MAY refrain from continually monitoring the notification address and SHOULD check the notification address periodically to detect payments sent by users who can not employ the alternate method.
|
||||
|
||||
A recipient specifies their preference for alternate notification by setting the appropriate bits in the feature byte of their payment code.
|
||||
|
||||
===Bitmessage Notification===
|
||||
|
||||
A recipient prefers to receive notifications via Bitmessage indiates this preference by:
|
||||
|
||||
* Setting bit 0 of the features byte to 1
|
||||
* Appending a byte containing the desired Bitmessage address version to the payment code at byte 67
|
||||
* Appending a byte containing the desired Bitmessage stream number to the payment code at byte 68
|
||||
|
||||
The sender uses this information to construct a valid notification Bitmessage address:
|
||||
|
||||
# Use the recipient's 0<sup>th</sup> public key as the Bitmessage signing key: <pre>B</pre>
|
||||
# Initialize a counter at 1: <pre>n</pre>
|
||||
# Derive a candidate encryption key: <pre>B' = B + nG</pre>
|
||||
# If the combination of B and B` do not form a valid Bitmessage address, increment n by one and try again
|
||||
# Use the address version, signing key, encryption key, and stream number to construct a Bitmessage address per the Bitmessage protocol
|
||||
|
||||
The sender transmits their payment code in base58 form to the calculated Bitmessage address.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to use Bitmessage notification, the recipient must have a Bitmessage client which listens at the address which the senders will derive and is capable of relaying received payment codes to the Bitcoin wallet.
|
||||
|
||||
==Reference==
|
||||
|
||||
* [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP32 - Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets]]
|
||||
* [[bip-0043.mediawiki|BIP43 - Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets]]
|
||||
* [[bip-0044.mediawiki|BIP44 - Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets]]
|
||||
* [[https://github.com/petertodd/dust-b-gone|dust-b-gone]]
|
||||
* [[https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encoding|Base58Check encoding]]
|
||||
* [[https://bitmessage.org/bitmessage.pdf|Bitmessage]]
|
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-01.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-01.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 36 KiB |
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-02.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-02.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 34 KiB |
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-03.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-03.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 50 KiB |
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-04.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-04.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 37 KiB |
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-05.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-05.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 46 KiB |
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-06.png
Normal file
BIN
bip-0047/reusable_payment_codes-06.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 39 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user