mirrors/bitcoin-bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2024-11-19 01:40:05 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update BIP68 implementation to match spec

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
BtcDrak 2016-02-12 04:10:24 +00:00
parent fe1b3b5b7b
commit 0e48a2466c
1 changed files with 12 additions and 11 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
bip-0068.mediawiki
View File

@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ enum {
* disables nLockTime. */
static const uint32_t SEQUENCE_FINAL = 0xffffffff;
/* Below flags apply in the context of BIP 68*/
/* If this flag set, CTxIn::nSequence is NOT interpreted as a
* relative lock-time. Setting the most significant bit of a
* sequence number disabled relative lock-time. */
* relative lock-time. */
static const uint32_t SEQUENCE_LOCKTIME_DISABLE_FLAG = (1 << 31);
/* If CTxIn::nSequence encodes a relative lock-time and this flag
@ -174,16 +174,17 @@ bool SequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags, std::vector<int>* prevHeig
bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags)
{
AssertLockHeld(cs_main);
AssertLockHeld(mempool.cs);
CBlockIndex* tip = chainActive.Tip();
CBlockIndex index;
index.pprev = tip;
// CheckSequenceLocks() uses chainActive.Height()+1 to evaluate
// height based locks because when SequenceLocks() is called within
// CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being*
// evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a
// transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call
// SequenceLocks() with one more than chainActive.Height().
// ConnectBlock(), the height of the block *being*
// evaluated is what is used.
// Thus if we want to know if a transaction can be part of the
// *next* block, we need to use one more than chainActive.Height()
index.nHeight = tip->nHeight + 1;
// pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()