This addresses task 2 in issue 4257
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4257
This new gRPC Wallet service method displays the balance and number
of confimirmations of the most recent transaction for the given BTC
wallet address.
The new method required the usual boilerplate changes to grpc.proto,
CliMain, and GrpcWalletService.
Two unit tests to check error msgs was added to cli/test.sh.
This addresses task #1 in issue https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4257.
This new gRPC WalletService method displays the BTC wallet's list of
receiving addresses. The balance and number of confirmations
for the most recent transaction is displayed to the right of each
address. Instead of returning a gRPC data structure to the client,
the service method returns a formatted String.
If the BTC wallet has no unused addresses, one will be created and
included in the returned list, and it can be used to fund the wallet.
The new method required injection of the BtcWalletService into CoreWalletsService,
and the usual boilerplate changes to grpc.proto, CliMain, and GrpcWalletService.
Some of the next PRs (for #4257) will require some common functionality within
CoreWalletsService, so these additional changes were included:
* a private, class level formatSatoshis function
* a public getNumConfirmationsForMostRecentTransaction method
* a public getAddressBalance method
* a private getAddressEntry method
A unit test that verifies a successful return status was added to cli/test.sh.
- "Memo" field is modeled as property of the new object Transaction which is stored in persitant storage.
- Transaction object is modeled in a way that allows extension in the furure for more persisted attributes.
The routine `cleanUpAddressEntries` in TradeManager was prematurely
releasing funds associated with trades when they reach the last
step of the process (Step 4, Withdraw to External Wallet).
Usually, with a single trade active this would not be an issue
because `cleanUpAddressEntries` is called after the withdrawal,
but if you have more than one trade at Step 4 then the first
withdrawal would go though, but all the others would fail with
an error box "Missing x.xxx BTC" (the trade proceeds or deposit
amount). Alternatively, if you restart the bisq app with a
trade in Step 4, the same cleanup will occur and the attempt
to withdraw to external wallet will fail.
The change here considers any trade held by the TradeManager to
be in use and therefore will not have their associated address
entries freed up. After Step 4 has passed, the trade is no
longer held by the TradeManager, and so cleanUpAddressEntries
will at that point free up the address.
The CoreWalletService should never be running more than one wallet lock
TimerTask at any given time, and the wallet should lock at the correct time
after a user overrides a prior timeout value.
The CoreWalletService now cancels any existing lock TimerTask thread
before creating a new one, to prevent the wallet from re-locking at
unexpected times.
This change prevents error conditions created in scenarios similar to
the following:
(1) User unlocks wallet for 60s
(2) User overrides unlock timeout by calling unlockwallet "pwd" 600s
(3) After 60s, the 1st, uncanceled lock timeout expires, and wallet is
locked 4 minutes too soon.
When exporting trade history to CSV, users would expect to see
their own transaction and trade fees listed. Maker fees are
stored on the Offer, Taker fees are stored on the Trade object.
The code was not properly checking whether the user was the
Offer Maker or Taker, and as such the report was always displaying
the Taker information for Tx and Trade fee. Therefore any trades
where the user was Maker showed the wrong fees.
The column title `Maker Fee` is incorrect and misleading since
the user doing the export is not necessarily the Maker. We
rename this column to `Trade Fee` to indicate that it is the fee
the user paid for trading regardless of Maker/Taker status.
Fixes#4207
Manfred [0] pointed out that COMPENSATION_REQUEST_MIN_AMOUNT and
REIMBURSEMENT_MIN_AMOUNT should be checked for not exceeding 200k BSQ
too.
[0] 4ec6bac658..fb76fd6548 (r420249962)
Without the break statement, the execution would continue through the subsequent case clauses until it encountered a break, executing `checkArgument` calls meant for `REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT`. More specifically, the bug would cause a failed check in the case where `inputValueAsCoin.value <= 200000000` is false.
There is no need to decrypt and re-encrypt wallet files in the unlock
and lock wallet methods. The temporary aesKey saved in the unlock
method will used for operations on an encrypted wallet.
There is also no need to cache a tempKeyCrypterScrypt; this class
level variable was removed.
Cache the aesKey instead of the password in unlock wallet method,
avoiding extra overhead of deriving it from the temp password in the
lock method.
The KeyCrypterScrypt used in the unlock method must also be cached for
use in the manual lock method. Creating a new KeyCrypterScrypt instance
in the manual lock method would have a different random salt value,
invalidating the password used in the unlock method.
Without bugfix, method would try to encrypt the wallet using using the
old password argument immediately after encrypting the wallet with
a new password.
Like the change in commits 163061a and 9164579, removeWalletPassword
now throws an IllegalStateException with an appropriate message if
the wallet password cannot be removed.
Also deletes unused StatusApi enums.
Like the change in commit 163061a, setWalletPassword now throws an
IllegalStateException with an appropriate message if the wallet password
cannot be set.
Also deletes unused StatusApi enums.
And throw an IllegalStateException with an appropriate message if the
wallet is not available or still locked.
This change also eliminates the NullPointerException that would
sometimes be thrown when calling #getAvailableBalance after the wallet
has become available but before the balance has become available.
Previously, each wallet-related method was implemented with its own grpc
service. There is no need to do this, as a grpc service may declare
multiple rpc methods. This commit refactors everything wallet-related
into a single GrpcWalletService and also extracts a CoreWalletService
from CoreApi in order to avoid the latter becoming overly large.
Ideally, there would be no need for an abstraction in bisq.grpc called
CoreWalletService; we would ideally use such a service implemented in
bisq.core. The closest we have is WalletsManager, but it is not designed
to be used the way we are using it here in the grpc context. Rather than
making changes directly to core (which can be very risky), we will
rather make them here in this layer, designing exactly the "core wallet
service" we need, and can then later see about folding it into the
actual core.
This change removes non-idiomatic gRPC *Reply proto message fields.
The client should not receive success/fail values from server methods
with a void return type, nor an optional error_message from any server
method. This change improves error handling by wrapping an appropriate
gRPC Status with a meaningful error description in a StatusRuntimeException,
and placing it in the server's response StreamObserver. User error
messages are mapped to general purpose gRPC Status codes in a new ApiStatus
enum class. (Maybe ApiStatus should be renamed to CoreApiStatus.)
Add a missing bsqWalletService.isEncrypted() check and optional AES key
argument to the signMessage(..) call in ProofOfBurnService, analogous to
the BitcoinJ call to sign with an EC key in MyBlindVoteListService.
This fixes#3836.
Implemented lockwallet, unlockwallet, removewalletpassword, and
setwalletpassword methods with basic error handling.
Also added basic error handling to existing getbalance method,
and removed unused BalancePresentation from CoreAPI.
TODO: update help text
Without the break statement, the execution would continue through the subsequent case clauses until it encountered a break, executing `checkArgument` calls meant for `REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT`. More specifically, the bug would cause a failed check in the case where `inputValueAsCoin.value <= 200000000` is false.
This omission is currently not disruptive, since the next case clause only contains a break. Also converted a few `return false` to breaks, to align with the rest of the switch statement.
