Problem: When resolving Bisq libraries, e.g. `core` or `network` from
JitPack for use in other components like bisq-seednode or
bisq-pricenode, we have historically, resolved them by tag or by
branchname, e.g. with GAV coordinates like `io.bisq:core:v0.6.7` or
`io.bisq:core:master`. This works well enough, but now that we are
beginning to modularize more aggressively, we want to make sure that
it's possible at any time to publish the latest snapshots of these
libraries to one's own local ~/.m2 repository such that they can be
easily resolved from downstream components without the need to push
commits to the bisq-network/exchange remote, and to wait for JitPack to
do a just-in-time build.
Solution: By updating the version value of all modules here in the
exchange repository from 0.6.7 => 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT, one can run
`mvn install` to publish the latest "snapshot" of exchange libraries to
the local ~/.m2 repository and be sure to resolve them from whatever
downstream component that they are working on. The -SNAPSHOT qualifier
ensures that no caching occurs, and that the very latest such binary
will always be used.
This new arrangement creates a situation where one can transparently
resolve these dependencies remotely from JitPack and then subsequently
resolve them locally from one's ~/.m2 repository without having to
change a line of code.
It also opens up the ability to manage all Bisq components together in a
single IDE window as if they were all in one repository, avoiding the
need even to issue a `mvn install` command to publish locally--but
that's not the main focus of this change.
Note that the change to 0.7.0 here is based on the fact that we already
planned to have the next version shipped from `master` be 0.7.0, as
there are quite a few new UI changes that probably merit the bump in
minor version. The version change also aligns well with the fact that
we're modularizing a number of components right now, and all
newly-extracted components have been jumping to v0.7.0 to indicate their
new independent status. This has been the case with bisq-seednode and
pricenode so far.
Finally, it is important to note here that the ONLY versions updated by
this change are those specific to Maven metadata and therefore artifact
management / dependency resolution. The version that the Bisq desktop
client reports in its UI and to the network in its user agent has NOT
been changed, on account of the fact that users may run Bisq from
source, and we need to think through more fully the implications of
reporting a verison like 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT in those situations. Here is a
list of files containing the old version (0.6.7) that have NOT been
updated:
- common/src/main/java/io/bisq/common/app/Version.java
- package/linux/32bitBuild.sh
- package/linux/Dockerfile
- package/osx/create_app.sh
- package/osx/finalize.sh
- package/windows/32bitBuild.bat
- package/windows/64bitBuild.bat
- package/windows/Bisq.iss
- package/linux/64bitBuild.sh
One thing we know for sure that wouldn't work here is that Bisq's
Version class currently does not support -SNAPSHOT qualifiers. It just
breaks the version string validation entirely. So we'd need to patch
that in any case if we do decide it's a good idea to let pre-release
builds report their version accurately.
Problem: The current `io.bisq` groupid does not align with the way
JitPack supports custom groupids. In order to be able to both resolve
artifacts from JitPack *and* be able to resolve the same artifacts from
one's local ~/.m2 repository, Bisq artifacts need to have the same GAV
coordinates everywhere (groupid, artifactid, version).
Solution: This commit changes all groupids from io.bisq =>
io.bisq.exchange to match the GAV coordinates produced / expected by
JitPack.
So where Bisq's core module would previously have been resolvable with
GAV coordinates `io.bisq:core:v0.6.7` it will now be resolvable as
`io.bisq.exchange:core:v0.6.7`.
Note that this change is not just to satisfy JitPack idiosyncracies, but
is actually good naming practice anyway where a multi-module build is
involved, and is arguably the way it should have been all along.
[1]: https://jitpack.io/docs/#publishing-on-jitpack
This commit removes seednode specific docs and updates doc/build.md as
necessary to reflect the fact that the seednode module is being
extracted into its own repository.
