The old PeerManagerTest was located under network/p2p/routing, which is
no longer the correct location. Additionally, it was outdated so I
just removed it and added a new file under network/p2p/peers containing
tests for checkMaxConnections.
All test callers now just ask the TestState for a SavedTestState instead
of SavedTestState ctor. This makes more sense with the object
relationship since SavedTestState is only used internally to TestState.
One monolithic test was useful when it was under development to reduce
code churn, but now that the tests are complete it is easier to find
and run a specific test when separated into separate test files.
This also fixes a downside of Enclosed.class that didn't allow individual
tests to be run in intellij.
Now that the unit tests cover all of the per-Entry validation,
the tests that create specific configuration of ProtectedStorageEntry
and ProtectedMailboxStorageEntry objects can be removed in favor
of mockable Entrys.
Using mocks prior to this patch was impossible due to the relationship
between the Entry objects and the P2PDataStorage helper functions. Now
that the objects are properly abstracted and tested, real unit tests
can be written for the P2PDataStore module.
This patch leaves the tests and adds an @Ignore so the reviewer can see
which unit test now supersedes the integration test.
Use a more compact version of string formatting
in log messages
Rename isMetadataEquals to matchesRelevantPubKey
which is more descriptive of the actual check
Now that all the code is abstracted and tested, the remove()
and removeMailboxData() functions are identical. Combine them and update
callers appropriately.
Now, any caller don't need to know the difference and it removes the
sharp edge originally found in #3556
Make the remove validation more robust by asserting that the
correct remove message is broadcast. This will provide a better
safety net when combining the remove functions.
Let the objects compare their metadata instead of doing it for them. This
allows for actual unit testing and paves the way for deduplicating the
remove code paths.
This patch also removes an unnecessary check around comparing the hash
of the stored data to the new data's hash. That check can't fail since
the hash was a requirement for the map lookup in the first place.
The current check verifies that the stored Payload.ownerPubKey == stored Entry.ownerPubKey.
This is the same check that was done when the item was originally added
and there is no reason to do it again.
This mailbox-only check can now exist inside the object for which it
belongs. This makes it easier to test and moves closer to allowing
the deduplication of the remove() methods.
Move the signature checks into the objects to clean up the calling code
and make it more testable.
The testing now has to take real hashes so some work was done in the fixtures
to create valid hashable objects.
Now that the objects can answer questions about valid conditions
for add/remove, ask them directly.
This also pushes the logging down into the ProtectedStorageEntry and
ProtectedMailboxStorageEntry and cleans up the message.
Method bodies are copied from P2PDataStore to separate refactoring
efforts and behavior changes.
Identified a bug where a ProtectedMailboxStorageEntry mailbox entry
could be added, but never removed.
The code around validating MailboxStoragePayloads is subtle when
a MailboxStoragePayload is wrapped in a ProtectedStorageEntry. Add tests
to document the current behavior.
The custom code to verify the refreshTTLMessage's signature and update
an entry isn't necessary. Just have the code construct an updated
ProtectedStorageEntry from the existing and new data, verify it,
and add it to the map.
This also allows the removal of the ProtectedStorageEntry APIs
that modify internal state.
The original test would take over 5 seconds. Allow tests to set the number
of required entries before purge to a lower value so the tests
can run faster with the same confidence.
Add tests for removing expired entries and optionally purging
the sequence number map. Now possible since these tests have
control over time with the ClockFake.
The remove validation needed to be improved since deletes through
the expire path don't signal HashMap listeners or write sequence numbers.
Reduces non-deterministic failures of the refreshTTL tests that resulted
from the uncontrollable System.currentTimeMillis().
Now, all tests have extremely fine control over the elapsed time between
calls which makes the current and future tests much better.
Switch from System.currentTimeMills() to
Clock.millis() so dependency injection can
be used for tests that need finer control of time.
This involves attaching a Clock to the resolver
so all fromProto methods have one available when they
reconstruct a message. This uses the Injector for the APP
and a default Clock.systemDefaultZone is used in the manual
instantiations.
Work was already done in #3037 to make this possible.
All tests still use the default system clock for now.
Use the DI Clock object already available in P2PDataStore, instead
of calling System.currentTimeMillis() directly. These two functions
have the same behavior and switching over allows finer control
of time in the tests.
* Update MobileModel parseDescriptor to support iPhone 11
It was parsing only the first digit of the version and using that in a
comparison check to determine if the version is greater than 5.
This meant for the iPhone 11 it was comparing 1 > 5, returning an
incorrect result.
It now supports multi-digit version numbers (i.e. 11), including
support for a suffix in the version (i.e. 11S), just in case...
* Update to reflect isContentAvailable supports iPhone 6s and newer
Fix connection limit checks so as to prevent the following warning:
> WARN b.n.p2p.peers.PeerManager: No candidates found to remove (That
case should not be possible as we use in the last case all
connections).
Prove payments:
- clarifying that the official wallets (Monero GUI or CLI) are NOT required to send XMR, since user can use some alternative wallets (desktop: MyMonero, Exodus / mobile: Cake Wallet, MyMonero, Monerujo) that provide the information required to prove a payment (transaction key, transaction ID and destination address). This information is not provided by the remaining desktop and mobile wallets that currently support Monero, but since they could provide it in the future, I kept the warning about using other wallets different from the previously mentioned.
- listing Monero GUI as first option (for most users), and CLI as second option (for advanced users)
- renaming "transaction hash" to "transaction ID", which is used in official wallets
- renaming "tx private key" to "transaction key", which is used in official wallets
- adding "Secret key" as synonymous for "transaction key" (used in MyMonero wallet)
- adding "destination address" and keeping "recipient's address" as synonymous
- renaming History tab to Transactions tab in Monero GUI
- adding "save recipient address" option must be enabled in Cake Wallet settings
Check payments:
- adding Monero GUI must be in Advanced mode
- adding Monero GUI verification must be done in Check Transaction section of Prove/check page
- adding parameters TXID TXKEY ADDRESS to the command check_tx_key in Monero CLI, as instructions in (https://www.getmonero.org/resources/user-guides/prove-payment.html)
- adding Explore Monero website (https://www.exploremonero.com/receipt) as alternative to verify payments
- removing payment ID instructions (it is being deprecated at the end of November in v0.15)
More info:
- directing to subreddit Monero support (https://www.reddit.com/r/monerosupport/), which is actively maintained, instead of Monero forum (https://forum.getmonero.org).
Remove operations are now only processed if the sequence number
is greater than the last operation seen for a specific payload.
The only creator of new remove entrys is the P2PService layer that always increments
the sequence number. So, this is either left around from a time where
removes needed to work with non-incrementing sequence numbers or just
a longstanding bug.
With the completion of this patch, all operations now require increasing
sequence numbers so it should be easier to reason about the behavior in
future debugging.
Now returns false if the sequence number of the refresh matches
the last operation seen for the specified hash. This is a more expected
return value when no state change occurs.
The only callers are either P2PService users that always increment the
sequence number or the onMessage() handler which doesn't verify the return
so there will be no visible change other than the increased readability
of the code and deduplication of the code paths.
Now returns false on duplicate sequence numbers. This matches more of
the expected behavior for an add() function when the element previously exists.
The only callers are either P2PService users that always increment the
sequence number or the onMessage() handler which doesn't verify the return
so there will be no visible change other than the increased readability
of the code and deduplication of the code paths.
